Variability in mammalian dentitions: size-related bias in the coefficient of variation

The coefficient of variation has been used in many evolutionary studies. However, a strong negative correlation between this index and size may artificially inflate the apparent variability of small traits. This is most pronounced when variables whose size differs by more than an order of magnitude are compared or when the index is applied to variables whose size is within an order of magnitude of their measurement error. When this is likely to affect conclusions, other indexes of variability should be considered. One alternative is to use the standard deviation of log-transformed data; however, this index is sometimes still correlated with variable size so care should be exercised in its use. Another alternative is to regress the standard deviation onto mean variable size; however, this method may also be misleading if variables are not randomly distributed about the regression line. As an example of the effect of bias in the coefficient of variation, previous studies of mammalian dental variability profiles were re-evaluated. It was found that variation among teeth is relatively homogenous, both within and among species. The exception is that the canines of some mammalian species have variability that is considerably higher than would be expected from tooth size. Previous explanations of variability patterns that invoked developmental fields are incompatible with the new data.