Differential predation by the generalist predator Orius insidiosus on congeneric species of thrips that vary in size and behavior |
| |
Authors: | Stuart R. Reitz ,Joe E. Funderburk,& Scot M. Waring |
| |
Affiliation: | USDA-ARS-CMAVE, 6383 Mahan Dr., Tallahassee, FL 32308-1410, USA,;University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, 155 Research Rd, Quincy, FL 32351, USA,;Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA |
| |
Abstract: | We investigated interactions between the generalist predator Orius insidiosus (Say) (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) and two species of thrips prey, Frankliniella bispinosa (Morgan) and Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), and interspecific differences in morphology and behavior between these prey species that could contribute to differences in predation by O. insidiosus. Frankliniella occidentalis is significantly larger than F. bispinosa. Frankliniella bispinosa has greater mobility compared with F. occidentalis. When O. insidiosus was offered either F. bispinosa or F. occidentalis as prey in single species trials, there were no significant differences in the number of prey captured. However, O. insidiosus had significantly more encounters with F. bispinosa than with F. occidentalis. In arenas with equal numbers of both species, O. insidiosus encountered and captured F. occidentalis more than F. bispinosa. In large arenas with two pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L.), O. insidiosus preyed on more F. occidentalis than on F. bispinosa. These results indicate that O. insidiosus can prey on both thrips species, but that it preferentially captures F. occidentalis. The greater locomotion and movement of F. bispinosa, perhaps combined with its smaller size, allow it to evade predation by O. insidiosus better than F. occidentalis. Consequently, the observed preference of O. insidiosus for F. occidentalis is not exclusively a function of active selection by the predator but also could arise from inherent differences among prey. We propose this differential predation as a mechanism contributing to observed differences in the temporal dynamics of these species in pepper fields. |
| |
Keywords: | apparent competition predator–prey interactions Thysanoptera Thripidae Heteroptera Anthocoridae biological control activity budget |
|
|