首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Multiple mechanisms of uranium immobilization by Cellulomonas sp. strain ES6
Authors:Vaideeswaran Sivaswamy  Maxim I Boyanov  Brent M Peyton  Sridhar Viamajala  Robin Gerlach  William A Apel  Rajesh K Sani  Alice Dohnalkova  Kenneth M Kemner  Thomas Borch
Institution:1. Center for Multiphase Environmental Research and Department of Chemical Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington;2. Research and Development, NLC Nalco India Ltd, Pune, India;3. Biosciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois;4. Center for Biofilm Engineering, Chemical and Biological Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana;5. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio;6. telephone: +1‐419‐530‐8094;7. fax: +1‐419‐530‐8086;8. Biological Systems Department, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho;9. Chemical and Biological Engineering Department, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota;10. Fundamental Sciences Department, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington;11. Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
Abstract:Removal of hexavalent uranium (U(VI)) from aqueous solution was studied using a Gram‐positive facultative anaerobe, Cellulomonas sp. strain ES6, under anaerobic, non‐growth conditions in bicarbonate and PIPES buffers. Inorganic phosphate was released by cells during the experiments providing ligands for formation of insoluble U(VI) phosphates. Phosphate release was most probably the result of anaerobic hydrolysis of intracellular polyphosphates accumulated by ES6 during aerobic growth. Microbial reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) was also observed. However, the relative magnitudes of U(VI) removal by abiotic (phosphate‐based) precipitation and microbial reduction depended on the buffer chemistry. In bicarbonate buffer, X‐ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectroscopy showed that U in the solid phase was present primarily as a non‐uraninite U(IV) phase, whereas in PIPES buffer, U precipitates consisted primarily of U(VI)‐phosphate. In both bicarbonate and PIPES buffer, net release of cellular phosphate was measured to be lower than that observed in U‐free controls suggesting simultaneous precipitation of U and POurn:x-wiley:00063592:media:BIT22956:tex2gif-stack-1. In PIPES, U(VI) phosphates formed a significant portion of U precipitates and mass balance estimates of U and P along with XAFS data corroborate this hypothesis. High‐resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR‐TEM) and energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (EDS) of samples from PIPES treatments indeed showed both extracellular and intracellular accumulation of U solids with nanometer sized lath structures that contained U and P. In bicarbonate, however, more phosphate was removed than required to stoichiometrically balance the U(VI)/U(IV) fraction determined by XAFS, suggesting that U(IV) precipitated together with phosphate in this system. When anthraquinone‐2,6‐disulfonate (AQDS), a known electron shuttle, was added to the experimental reactors, the dominant removal mechanism in both buffers was reduction to a non‐uraninite U(IV) phase. Uranium immobilization by abiotic precipitation or microbial reduction has been extensively reported; however, the present work suggests that strain ES6 can remove U(VI) from solution simultaneously through precipitation with phosphate ligands and microbial reduction, depending on the environmental conditions. Cellulomonadaceae are environmentally relevant subsurface bacteria and here, for the first time, the presence of multiple U immobilization mechanisms within one organism is reported using Cellulomonas sp. strain ES6. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011;108: 264–276. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Keywords:U(VI) reduction  Cellulomonas  U(VI)‐phosphate  bioremediation  XAFS  U(IV)‐phosphate
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号