首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Dynamic modeling of nitrogen losses in river networks unravels the coupled effects of hydrological and biogeochemical processes
Authors:Richard B Alexander  John Karl Böhlke  Elizabeth W Boyer  Mark B David  Judson W Harvey  Patrick J Mulholland  Sybil P Seitzinger  Craig R Tobias  Christina Tonitto  Wilfred M Wollheim
Institution:1. U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA, 20192, USA
2. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
3. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
4. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, USA
5. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
6. University of North Carolina, Wilmington, NC, 28403, USA
7. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA
8. University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA
Abstract:The importance of lotic systems as sinks for nitrogen inputs is well recognized. A fraction of nitrogen in streamflow is removed to the atmosphere via denitrification with the remainder exported in streamflow as nitrogen loads. At the watershed scale, there is a keen interest in understanding the factors that control the fate of nitrogen throughout the stream channel network, with particular attention to the processes that deliver large nitrogen loads to sensitive coastal ecosystems. We use a dynamic stream transport model to assess biogeochemical (nitrate loadings, concentration, temperature) and hydrological (discharge, depth, velocity) effects on reach-scale denitrification and nitrate removal in the river networks of two watersheds having widely differing levels of nitrate enrichment but nearly identical discharges. Stream denitrification is estimated by regression as a nonlinear function of nitrate concentration, streamflow, and temperature, using more than 300 published measurements from a variety of US streams. These relations are used in the stream transport model to characterize nitrate dynamics related to denitrification at a monthly time scale in the stream reaches of the two watersheds. Results indicate that the nitrate removal efficiency of streams, as measured by the percentage of the stream nitrate flux removed via denitrification per unit length of channel, is appreciably reduced during months with high discharge and nitrate flux and increases during months of low-discharge and flux. Biogeochemical factors, including land use, nitrate inputs, and stream concentrations, are a major control on reach-scale denitrification, evidenced by the disproportionately lower nitrate removal efficiency in streams of the highly nitrate-enriched watershed as compared with that in similarly sized streams in the less nitrate-enriched watershed. Sensitivity analyses reveal that these important biogeochemical factors and physical hydrological factors contribute nearly equally to seasonal and stream-size related variations in the percentage of the stream nitrate flux removed in each watershed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号