Dynamic modeling of nitrogen losses in river networks unravels the coupled effects of hydrological and biogeochemical processes |
| |
Authors: | Richard B Alexander John Karl Böhlke Elizabeth W Boyer Mark B David Judson W Harvey Patrick J Mulholland Sybil P Seitzinger Craig R Tobias Christina Tonitto Wilfred M Wollheim |
| |
Institution: | 1. U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA, 20192, USA 2. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA 3. University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA 4. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831, USA 5. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA 6. University of North Carolina, Wilmington, NC, 28403, USA 7. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA 8. University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, 03824, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | The importance of lotic systems as sinks for nitrogen inputs is well recognized. A fraction of nitrogen in streamflow is removed to the atmosphere via denitrification with the remainder exported in streamflow as nitrogen loads. At the watershed scale, there is a keen interest in understanding the factors that control the fate of nitrogen throughout the stream channel network, with particular attention to the processes that deliver large nitrogen loads to sensitive coastal ecosystems. We use a dynamic stream transport model to assess biogeochemical (nitrate loadings, concentration, temperature) and hydrological (discharge, depth, velocity) effects on reach-scale denitrification and nitrate removal in the river networks of two watersheds having widely differing levels of nitrate enrichment but nearly identical discharges. Stream denitrification is estimated by regression as a nonlinear function of nitrate concentration, streamflow, and temperature, using more than 300 published measurements from a variety of US streams. These relations are used in the stream transport model to characterize nitrate dynamics related to denitrification at a monthly time scale in the stream reaches of the two watersheds. Results indicate that the nitrate removal efficiency of streams, as measured by the percentage of the stream nitrate flux removed via denitrification per unit length of channel, is appreciably reduced during months with high discharge and nitrate flux and increases during months of low-discharge and flux. Biogeochemical factors, including land use, nitrate inputs, and stream concentrations, are a major control on reach-scale denitrification, evidenced by the disproportionately lower nitrate removal efficiency in streams of the highly nitrate-enriched watershed as compared with that in similarly sized streams in the less nitrate-enriched watershed. Sensitivity analyses reveal that these important biogeochemical factors and physical hydrological factors contribute nearly equally to seasonal and stream-size related variations in the percentage of the stream nitrate flux removed in each watershed. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|