o-Phthalaldehyde–N-acetylcysteine polyamine derivatives: formation and stability in solution and in C18 supports

A comparative study of different derivatization procedures has been performed in order to improve the stability of the reaction products o-phthalaldehyde–N-acetylcysteine (OPA–NAC) polyamines. Procedures such as solution derivatization, solution derivatization followed by retention on a packing support, derivatization on different packing supports and on-column derivatization, have been optimized and compared. The degradation rate constant (k) of the derivative was dependent on the procedure used and on the analyte. For the spermine (the most unstable isoindol tested) k was 8±2×10⁻² min⁻¹ in solution versus 7.7±1.1×10⁻⁴ min⁻¹ on the (C₁₈) solid support. The results obtained showed that forming the derivative on the packing support (C₁₈) gave the best results following this procedure: conditioning the cartridges with borate buffer (1 ml, 0.5 M, pH 8), retention of the analyte, addition of 0.8 ml of OPA–NAC reagent, 0.2 ml borate buffer 0.8 M (pH 8) and elution of the isoindol with 3 ml of MeOH–borate buffer (9:1). The different derivatization procedures have been used to study the stability of the reaction products OPA–NAC polyamines formed in urine matrix using spermine as model compound. Similar results were obtained for standard solutions and urine samples.