首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      

不同制图尺度及土壤数据对土壤全磷储量估算的影响
引用本文:李衡荣,张黎明,李晓迪,于东升,史学正,邢世和,陈翰阅.不同制图尺度及土壤数据对土壤全磷储量估算的影响[J].生态学杂志,2016,27(6):1737-1749.
作者姓名:李衡荣  张黎明  李晓迪  于东升  史学正  邢世和  陈翰阅
作者单位:1.福建农林大学资源与环境学院, 福州 350002; ;2.土壤生态系统健康与调控福建省高校重点实验室, 福州 350002; ;3.中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室, 南京 210008
基金项目:本文由国家自然科学基金项目(41001126)、福建省自然科学基金项目(2015J01154)和福建省高校杰出青年科研人才计划基金项目(JA13093)资助
摘    要:准确计算农田土壤磷储量对农业可持续发展和面源污染治理具有重要意义,但以往的磷储量研究并没有考虑不同土壤数据源和制图尺度造成的估算误差.本文以江苏北部29个县(市)约393×104 hm2旱地为例,分析了我国《县级土种志》、《地级市土种志》、《省级土种志》和《中国土种志》中记录土壤剖面资料分别建立的1∶5万、1∶25万、1∶50万、1∶100万、1∶400万和1∶1000万数据库对土壤全磷储量估算的影响.结果表明: 与数据最详细、记录有983个土壤剖面的《县级土种志》1∶5万尺度全磷密度和储量相比,其他不同土壤数据源建立的各个尺度土壤数据库估算的全磷密度和储量相对偏差分别在4.8%~48.9%和1.6%~48.4%.大部分《县级土种志》和《地级市土种志》土壤数据源建立的不同尺度全磷密度与《县级土种志》1∶5万尺度之间存在极显著或显著差异,《省级土种志》和《中国土种志》土壤数据源建立的不同尺度全磷密度与《县级土种志》1∶5万尺度之间均存在极显著差异,说明在旱地磷储量估算的研究中,选择适宜的制图尺度和土壤数据源是非常必要的.

关 键 词:全磷密度  全磷储量  土壤数据源  制图比例尺  苏北地区
收稿时间:2015-10-08

Effects of soil data and map scale on assessment of total phosphorus storage in upland soils.
LI Heng-rong,ZHANG Li-ming,LI Xiao-di,YU Dong-sheng,SHI Xue-zheng,XING Shi-he,CHEN Han-yue.Effects of soil data and map scale on assessment of total phosphorus storage in upland soils.[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2016,27(6):1737-1749.
Authors:LI Heng-rong  ZHANG Li-ming  LI Xiao-di  YU Dong-sheng  SHI Xue-zheng  XING Shi-he  CHEN Han-yue
Institution:1.College of Resource and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Fores-try University, Fuzhou 350002, China; ;2.Key Laboratory of Soil Ecosystem Health and Regulation of Universities and Colleges of Fujian Province, Fuzhou 350002, China; ;3.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
Abstract:Accurate assessment of total phosphorus storage in farmland soils is of great significance to sustainable agricultural and non-point source pollution control. However, previous studies haven’t considered the estimation errors from mapping scales and various databases with different sources of soil profile data. In this study, a total of 393×104 hm2 of upland in the 29 counties (or cities) of North Jiangsu was cited as a case for study. Analysis was performed of how the four sources of soil profile data, namely, “Soils of County”, “Soils of Prefecture”, “Soils of Province” and “Soils of China”, and the six scales, i.e. 1:50000, 1:250000, 1:500000, 1:1000000, 1:4000000 and1:10000000, used in the 24 soil databases established for the four soil journals, affected assessment of soil total phosphorus. Compared with the most detailed 1:50000 soil database established with 983 upland soil profiles, relative deviation of the estimates of soil total phosphorus density (STPD) and soil total phosphorus storage (STPS) from the other soil databases varied from 4.8% to 48.9% and from 1.6% to 48.4%, respectively. The estimated STPD and STPS based on the 1:50000 database of “Soils of County” and most of the estimates based on the databases of each scale in “Soils of County” and “Soils of Prefecture” were different, with the significance levels of P<0.001 or P<0.05. Extremely significant differences (P<0.001) existed between the estimates based on the 1:50000 database of “Soils of County” and the estimates based on the databases of each scale in “Soils of Province” and “Soils of China”. This study demonstrated the significance of appropriate soil data sources and appropriate mapping scales in estimating STPS.
Keywords:total phosphorus density  total phosphorus storage  source of soil data  mapping scale  North Jiangsu  
点击此处可从《生态学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号