| Abstract: | Monte Carlo Investigations have been widely used in Sample Surveys in Comparing the efficiency of various methods when exact mathematical comparisons are not possible. In this paper the same has been used for comparing the efficiency of Stratified Random Sampling with respect to Simple Random Sampling for estimation of Relative Risk in Case-Control Studies. The data used relate to a Case Control study on peptic ulcer. On the basis of Monte Carlo Investigations on 50 samples of size 10–20 (Cases and Controls), it has been observed that there is considerable gain in efficiency in using Stratified Random Sampling over Simple Random Sampling. The sensitivity of the results with the change in Sample Size has also been investigated. |
