首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


Wetland Waterbird Food Resources Increased by Harvesting Invasive Cattails
Authors:Shane C Lishawa  Eric M Dunton  Douglas R Pearsall  Andrew M Monks  Kurtis B Himmler  Brendan D Carson  Brian Loges  Dennis A Albert
Institution:1. Loyola University Chicago, 1032 W. Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL, 60660 USA;2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge, 6975 Mower Rd., Saginaw, MI, 48601 USA;3. The Nature Conservancy in Michigan, 101 E. Cesar E. Chavez Avenue, Lansing, MI, 48906 USA;4. Tufts University, 419 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA, 02155 USA;5. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Natural Resources and Conservation Planning, 364 Wildlife Conservation Road, Brussels, IL, 62013 USA;6. Oregon State University, 1500 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR, 97331 USA
Abstract:The conservation of many freshwater marsh waterbirds (i.e., waterfowl, shorebirds, wading birds, and secretive marshbirds) in the Laurentian Great Lakes requires managing invasive emergent macrophytes, which degrade waterbird habitat by creating dense, litter-clogged stands, and excluding plants that produce nutritionally balanced and high-energy food (seeds, tubers, and submerged aquatic vegetation). The most commonly used management approach in the United States Great Lakes region involves the application of herbicides, which can stimulate waterbird forage plants but does not address the accumulation of plant litter, the underlying cause of plant community diversity loss and habitat degradation. We experimentally evaluated the effects of an alternative approach, harvesting invasive plants and their litter followed by flooding, on plant communities, focusing on the effects of these treatments to increase the abundance of high-energy wetland plants. At the Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge in Michigan, USA, we experimentally treated an invasive cattail (Typha × glauca)-dominated wetland in August and September of 2016, 2017, and 2018, using a randomized block design with 4 blocks and 3 treatments (sediment surface harvest, above ground harvest, and control). We monitored the effects of these treatments on the abundance and dominance of waterbird forage-producing plants, plant diversity, and plant communities prior to (Jul 2016) and during the summer following each treatment (late Jul or early Aug 2017, 2018, and 2019). Additionally, we used pre- and post-treatment waterbird use-day data collected at the unit scale and compared values with satellite imagery-derived land cover changes. Compared to control plots, 3 years of harvesting and flooding significantly increased plant species diversity, increased the abundance of waterbird seed- and tuber-producing plant species by 5 times, and increased annual plant dominance by more than 10 times, while substantially reducing all measures of cattail and its litter. Use-days increased for total waterbirds, including waterfowl and dabbling ducks, following treatment. Cattail cover decreased and open water and non-cattail emergent vegetation cover increased. Harvesting invasive plant biomass coupled with flooding promoted a plant community composition and structure beneficial to waterbirds. © 2020 The Wildlife Society.
Keywords:cattail  Great Lakes  harvest  invasive plants  management  seeds  Typha?×?glauca  waterbirds
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号