首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
   检索      


RosettaDDGPrediction for high-throughput mutational scans: From stability to binding
Authors:Valentina Sora  Adrian Otamendi Laspiur  Kristine Degn  Matteo Arnaudi  Mattia Utichi  Ludovica Beltrame  Dayana De Menezes  Matteo Orlandi  Ulrik Kristoffer Stoltze  Olga Rigina  Peter Wad Sackett  Karin Wadt  Kjeld Schmiegelow  Matteo Tiberti  Elena Papaleo
Institution:1. Cancer Structural Biology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

Cancer Systems Biology, Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Methodology (equal), Software (equal), Visualization (supporting), Writing - original draft (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal);2. Cancer Systems Biology, Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Data curation (equal), Formal analysis (equal), ?Investigation (supporting), Methodology (equal), Software (supporting), Validation (supporting), Visualization (equal), Writing - original draft (supporting), Writing - review & editing (supporting);3. Cancer Systems Biology, Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

Contribution: Conceptualization (supporting), Data curation (supporting), Formal analysis (supporting), ?Investigation (supporting), Methodology (supporting), Supervision (supporting), Visualization (equal), Writing - original draft (supporting);4. Cancer Structural Biology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

Cancer Systems Biology, Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

Contribution: Conceptualization (supporting), Formal analysis (supporting), ?Investigation (supporting), Visualization (equal), Writing - original draft (supporting);5. Cancer Structural Biology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

Cancer Systems Biology, Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

Contribution: Conceptualization (supporting), Formal analysis (supporting), ?Investigation (supporting), Visualization (supporting), Writing - original draft (supporting);6. Cancer Structural Biology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

Cancer Systems Biology, Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

Contribution: Formal analysis (supporting), ?Investigation (supporting), Validation (supporting), Visualization (supporting), Writing - original draft (supporting);7. Cancer Systems Biology, Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

Contribution: Formal analysis (supporting), ?Investigation (supporting), Visualization (supporting), Writing - original draft (supporting);8. Cancer Systems Biology, Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

Contribution: Data curation (supporting), Formal analysis (supporting);9. Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Contribution: Data curation (supporting), Validation (supporting), Writing - review & editing (supporting);10. Cancer Systems Biology, Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

Contribution: Data curation (supporting), Software (supporting);11. Cancer Systems Biology, Section for Bioinformatics, Department of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

Contribution: Resources (supporting), Software (supporting);12. Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Contribution: Data curation (supporting), Funding acquisition (supporting), Supervision (supporting), Writing - review & editing (supporting);13. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Contribution: Funding acquisition (equal), Supervision (supporting), Writing - review & editing (supporting);14. Cancer Structural Biology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

Contribution: Conceptualization (supporting), ?Investigation (supporting), Methodology (supporting), Supervision (supporting), Validation (equal), Visualization (supporting), Writing - original draft (supporting), Writing - review & editing (supporting);15. Cancer Structural Biology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract:Reliable prediction of free energy changes upon amino acid substitutions (ΔΔGs) is crucial to investigate their impact on protein stability and protein–protein interaction. Advances in experimental mutational scans allow high-throughput studies thanks to multiplex techniques. On the other hand, genomics initiatives provide a large amount of data on disease-related variants that can benefit from analyses with structure-based methods. Therefore, the computational field should keep the same pace and provide new tools for fast and accurate high-throughput ΔΔG calculations. In this context, the Rosetta modeling suite implements effective approaches to predict folding/unfolding ΔΔGs in a protein monomer upon amino acid substitutions and calculate the changes in binding free energy in protein complexes. However, their application can be challenging to users without extensive experience with Rosetta. Furthermore, Rosetta protocols for ΔΔG prediction are designed considering one variant at a time, making the setup of high-throughput screenings cumbersome. For these reasons, we devised RosettaDDGPrediction, a customizable Python wrapper designed to run free energy calculations on a set of amino acid substitutions using Rosetta protocols with little intervention from the user. Moreover, RosettaDDGPrediction assists with checking completed runs and aggregates raw data for multiple variants, as well as generates publication-ready graphics. We showed the potential of the tool in four case studies, including variants of uncertain significance in childhood cancer, proteins with known experimental unfolding ΔΔGs values, interactions between target proteins and disordered motifs, and phosphomimetics. RosettaDDGPrediction is available, free of charge and under GNU General Public License v3.0, at https://github.com/ELELAB/RosettaDDGPrediction .
Keywords:binding free energy  folding free energy  free energy calculations  Rosetta
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号