Effects of storage,mucilage presence,photoperiod, thermoperiod and salinity on germination of Farsetia aegyptia Turra (Brassicaceae) seeds: implications for restoration and seed banks in Arabian Desert

Seed viability and germination are key factors in the success of restoration efforts, especially when stored seeds are used. However, the effect of seed storage on germination of most of the native Arabian species is not well documented. We investigated the effect of storage time and role of the seed mucilage in regulating germination, dormancy, salinity tolerance and consequential survival strategy of F. aegyptia in an unpredictable arid desert setting. Effect of light and temperature during germination was studied under two photoperiods and two thermoperiods using intact and de-mucilaged seeds. Presence of mucilage and thermoperiod did not affect the germination. However, seed collection year and photoperiod had a highly significant effect on the germination. Increasing salinity levels decreased the germination of F. aegyptia but ungerminated seeds were able to germinate when salinity stress was alleviated. Seed storage at room temperature enhances the germination percentage, indicating that F. aegyptia seeds have physiological dormancy and it can be alleviated by after-ripening at dry storage. In addition, F. aegyptia seeds show ability to germinate at lower salinity concentration and remain viable even at higher saline conditions, indicating their adaptability to cope with such harsh environmental conditions.     

ROLE OF GOLGI APPARATUS IN MUCILAGE PRODUCTION AND CYST FORMATION IN EUGLENA GRACILIS (EUGLENOPHYCEAE)1

Dark grown cells of Euglena gracilis Klebs (strain Z Pringsheim) encyst when placed in minus nitrogen media for 48–72 h in the dark. The number of cisternae per dictyosome decreases from 10–20 to 6–12 during encystment. Cisternae dilate and fill with mucilage within 12–18 h after induction. The material is secreted into the reservoir and deposited onto the cell surface. The encysting cells rotate as they develop resulting in the deposition of a thick mucilaginous layer over the cell surface. The secretion product has been identified as polysaccharide with the periodic acid-silver methenamine reaction. Mucilage has not been observed in the endoplasmic reticulum adjacent to the pellicle. The product present in the dictyosornes and on the cell surface react identically to the silver reagent.     

The expansion of maize root-cap mucilage during hydration. 2. Observations on soil-grown roots by cryo-scanning electron microscopy

Expansion of root-cap mucilage during hydration was followed by cryo-scanning analytical microscopy of soil-grown roots of diploperennis and Zea mays. Roots examined directly from the soil have no expanded mucilage. Their condensed, unexpanded mucilage is in three domains, periplasmic, intercellular and peripheral to the cap tissue. Carbon concentration is the same in the three domains. During hydration there is no change in carbon concentration as the condensed mucilage moves through these three domains; however there is a sharp drop at the periphery where a gel phase transition occurs. The rate of expansion of the mucilage blob around the root tip is limited by the rate of this gel phase transition.     

Root hairs are the most important root trait for rhizosheath formation of barley (Hordeum vulgare), maize (Zea mays) and Lotus japonicus (Gifu)

Background and AimsRhizosheaths are defined as the soil adhering to the root system after it is extracted from the ground. Root hairs and mucilage (root exudates) are key root traits involved in rhizosheath formation, but to better understand the mechanisms involved their relative contributions should be distinguished.MethodsThe ability of three species [barley (Hordeum vulgare), maize (Zea mays) and Lotus japonicus (Gifu)] to form a rhizosheath in a sandy loam soil was compared with that of their root-hairless mutants [bald root barley (brb), maize root hairless 3 (rth3) and root hairless 1 (Ljrhl1)]. Root hair traits (length and density) of wild-type (WT) barley and maize were compared along with exudate adhesiveness of both barley and maize genotypes. Furthermore, root hair traits and exudate adhesiveness from different root types (axile versus lateral) were compared within the cereal species.Key ResultsPer unit root length, rhizosheath size diminished in the order of barley > L. japonicus > maize in WT plants. Root hairs significantly increased rhizosheath formation of all species (3.9-, 3.2- and 1.8-fold for barley, L. japonicus and maize, respectively) but there was no consistent genotypic effect on exudate adhesiveness in the cereals. While brb exudates were more and rth3 exudates were less adhesive than their respective WTs, maize rth3 bound more soil than barley brb. Although both maize genotypes produced significantly more adhesive exudate than the barley genotypes, root hair development of WT barley was more extensive than that of WT maize. Thus, the greater density of longer root hairs in WT barley bound more soil than WT maize. Root type did not seem to affect rhizosheath formation, unless these types differed in root length.ConclusionsWhen root hairs were present, greater root hair development better facilitated rhizosheath formation than root exudate adhesiveness. However, when root hairs were absent root exudate adhesiveness was a more dominant trait.     

Mucilage secretion: an adaptive mechanism to reduce seed removal by soil erosion?

Diaspores of many plant species inhabiting open vegetation in semi‐arid environments secrete mucilage after wetting (myxospermy) that glues the diaspores to the ground and prevents movement when the mucilage dries. In the present study, we test whether mucilage secretion can be considered as a selective response to soil erosion in plant species inhabiting semi‐arid environments. We relate the amount and type of mucilage secretion by seeds of Helianthemum violaceum and Fumana ericifolia (Cistaceae) to the number of raindrop impacts needed to remove these seeds after gluing them with their own mucilage to the ground and also the time that these seeds resist water run‐off without detaching. We also compare the amount of seed mucilage production by plants growing in habitats without erosion and plants affected by severe erosion by fitting mixed effect models. Our results show an important phenotypic variation in the amount of mucilage secretion in both species, although it is suggested that the effect of mucilage secretion in the rate of seed removal by erosion is species‐ and mechanism‐dependent. For F. ericifolia, the amount of mucilage secreted by the seeds is directly proportional to their resistance to raindrop impacts and is positively related to the intensity of the erosive processes that the plants experience. Nevertheless, all the seeds resist the force of run‐off during 60 min, irrespective of the amount of mucilage they produce. In H. violaceum, mucilage secretion per se, and not the amount of mucilage produced by the seeds, has an effect on the rate of seed removal by erosive processes. Furthermore, cellulosic fibrils were found only in the mucilage of F. ericifolia but not in H. violaceum. Overall, our results only partially support the hypothesis that a selective response to soil erosion exists. © 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 111 , 241–251.