The role of domain redundancy in genetic robustness against null mutations

A key question in molecular genetics is why severe gene mutations often do not result in a detectable abnormal phenotype. Alternative networks are known to be a gene compensation mechanism. Gene redundancy, i.e. the presence of a duplicate gene (or paralog) elsewhere in the genome, also underpins many cases of gene dispensability. Here, we investigated the role of partial duplicate genes on dispensability, where a partial duplicate is defined as a gene that has no paralog but which codes for a protein made of domains, each of which belongs to at least another protein. The rationale behind this investigation is that, as a partial duplicate codes for a domain redundant protein, we hypothesised that its deletion might have a less severe phenotypic effect than the deletion of other genes. This prompted us to (re)address the topic of gene dispensability by focusing on domain redundancy rather than on gene redundancy. Using fitness data of single-gene deletion mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we will show that domain redundancy is a compensation mechanism, the strength of which is lower than that of gene redundancy. Finally, we shall discuss the molecular basis of this new compensation mechanism.     

Higher duplicability of less important genes in yeast genomes

Gene duplication plays an important role in evolution because it is the primary source of new genes. Many recent studies showed that gene duplicability varies considerably among genes. Several considerations led us to hypothesize that less important genes have higher rates of successful duplications, where gene importance is measured by the fitness reduction caused by the deletion of the gene. Here, we test this hypothesis by comparing the importance of two groups of singleton genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sce). Group S genes did not duplicate in four other yeast species examined, whereas group D experienced duplication in these species. Consistent with our hypothesis, we found group D genes to be less important than group S genes. Specifically, 17% of group D genes are essential in Sce, compared to 28% for group S. Furthermore, deleting a group D gene in Sce reduces the fitness by 24% on average, compared to 38% for group S. Our subsequent analysis showed that less important genes have more cis-regulatory motifs, which could lead to a higher chance of subfunctionalization of duplicate genes and result in an enhanced rate of gene retention. Less important genes may also have weaker dosage imbalance effects and cause fewer genetic perturbations when duplicated. Regardless of the cause, our observation indicates that the previous finding of a less severe fitness consequence of deleting a duplicate gene than deleting a singleton gene is at least in part due to the fact that duplicate genes are intrinsically less important than singleton genes and suggests that the contribution of duplicate genes to genetic robustness has been overestimated.     

Rate of protein evolution versus fitness effect of gene deletion

Whether nonessential genes evolve faster than essential genes has been a controversial issue. To resolve this issue, we use the data from a nearly complete set of single-gene deletions in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to assess protein dispensability. Also, instead of the nematode, which was used previously but is only distantly related to S. cerevisiae, we use another yeast, Candida albicans, as a second species to estimate the evolutionary distances between orthologous genes in two species. Our analysis reveals only a weak correlation between protein dispensability and evolutionary rate. More important, the correlation disappears when duplicate genes are removed from the analysis. And surprisingly, the average rate of nonsynonymous substitution is considerably lower than that for single-copy genes in the yeast genome. This observation suggests that structural constraints are more important in determining the rate of evolution of a protein than dispensability because duplicate genes are on average more dispensable than single-copy genes. For duplicate genes, those with only a weak effect or no effect of deletion on fitness evolve on average faster than those with a moderate or strong effect of deletion on fitness, which in turn evolve on average faster than those with a lethal effect of deletion.     

Significant impact of protein dispensability on the instantaneous rate of protein evolution

The neutral theory of molecular evolution predicts that important proteins evolve more slowly than unimportant ones. High-throughput gene-knockout experiments in model organisms have provided information on the dispensability, and therefore importance, of thousands of proteins in a genome. However, previous studies of the correlation between protein dispensability and evolutionary rate were equivocal, and it has been proposed that the observed correlation is due to the covariation with the level of gene expression or is limited to duplicate genes. We here analyzed the gene dispensability data of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and estimated protein evolutionary rates by comparing S. cerevisiae with nine species of varying degrees of divergence from S. cerevisiae. The correlation between gene dispensability and evolutionary rate, although low, is highly significant, even when the gene expression level is controlled for or when duplicate genes are excluded. Our results thus support the hypothesis of lower evolution rates for more important proteins, a widely used principle in the daily practice of molecular biology. When the evolutionary rate is estimated from closely related species, the ratio between the mean rate of nonessential proteins to that of essential proteins is 1.4. This ratio declines to 1.1 when the evolutionary rate is estimated from distantly related species, suggesting that the importance of a protein may change in evolution, so the dispensability data obtained from a model organism only predicts a short-term rate of protein evolution. A comparison of the fitness contributions of orthologous genes in yeast and nematode supports this conclusion.     

A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution

A gene's rate of sequence evolution is among the most fundamental evolutionary quantities in common use, but what determines evolutionary rates has remained unclear. Here, we carry out the first combined analysis of seven predictors (gene expression level, dispensability, protein abundance, codon adaptation index, gene length, number of protein-protein interactions, and the gene's centrality in the interaction network) previously reported to have independent influences on protein evolutionary rates. Strikingly, our analysis reveals a single dominant variable linked to the number of translation events which explains 40-fold more variation in evolutionary rate than any other, suggesting that protein evolutionary rate has a single major determinant among the seven predictors. The dominant variable explains nearly half the variation in the rate of synonymous and protein evolution. We show that the two most commonly used methods to disentangle the determinants of evolutionary rate, partial correlation analysis and ordinary multivariate regression, produce misleading or spurious results when applied to noisy biological data. We overcome these difficulties by employing principal component regression, a multivariate regression of evolutionary rate against the principal components of the predictor variables. Our results support the hypothesis that translational selection governs the rate of synonymous and protein sequence evolution in yeast.