Dynamics in a discrete two-species competition model: coexistence and over-compensation

The dynamic features of an over-compensating discrete two-species competition system with stable coexistence are recaptured, and it is shown how the probabilities of the different possible ecological scenarios, e.g. coexistence, may be calculated when the assumption of no over-compensation is loosened. A Bayesian methodology for calculating the probability that stable oscillations or chaos may occur in plant populations or communities is outlined. The methodology is exemplified using an experimental population of Arabidopsis thaliana. It is concluded that, when making ecological predictions it is preferable and possibly important to test for the possibility of chaotic population dynamics due to over-compensation rather than assuming a priori that over-compensation does not occur.     

生长的冗余—作物对于虫害超越补偿作用的一种解释

本文阐述了作物在株高、叶面积、分枝或分蘖数、繁殖器官数量、生育期长度及生物产量对经济产量的比例等方面常存在大量冗余。这种冗余随着辅助能量输入的增加而增大。生长冗余本是生物适应波动环境的一种生态对策,以便增大稳定性,减小绝种的风险。但当环境条件改善或经人类支持与保护后,作物的这种固有的冗余特性变成了一种浪费和负担,对高产不利。通过栽培或育种手段减少冗余便可高产。在一些情形下,昆虫取食能减少作物的冗余。这便是作物对虫害的超越补偿的基本原因。     

How does intraspecific density regulation influence metapopulation synchrony and persistence?

Intraspecific density regulation influences the synchronization of local population dynamics through dispersal. Spatial synchrony in turn may jeopardize metapopulation persistence. Joining results from previous studies suggests that spatial synchrony is highest at moderate over-compensation and is low at compensating and at very strong over-compensating density regulation. We scrutinize this supposition of a unimodal relationship using a process-based metapopulation model with explicit local population dynamics. We extend the usually studied range of density regulation to under-compensation and analyse resulting metapopulation persistence. We find peaks of spatial synchrony not only at over-compensatory but also under-compensatory density regulation and show that effects of local density compensation on synchrony follow a bimodal rather than unimodal relationship. Persistence of metapopulations however, shows a unimodal relationship with a broad plateau of high persistence from compensatory to over-compensatory density regulation. This range of high persistence comprises both levels of low and high spatial synchrony. Thus, not synchrony alone jeopardizes metapopulation persistence, but only in interplay with high local extinction risk. The functional forms of the relations of density compensation with spatial synchrony and persistence are robust to increases in dispersal mortality, landscape dynamics, or density dependence of dispersal. However, with each of these increases the maxima of spatial synchrony and persistence shift to higher over-compensation and levels of synchrony are reduced. Overall, for over-compensation high landscape connectivity has negative effects while for under-compensation connectivity affects persistence positively. This emphasizes the importance of species life-history traits for management decisions with regard to landscape connectivity: while dispersal corridors are essential for species with under-compensatory density regulation, they may have detrimental effects for endangered species with over-compensation.     

Hutchinson revisited: Patterns of density regulation and the coexistence of strong competitors

Ecologists have long been searching for mechanisms of species coexistence, particularly since G.E. Hutchinson raised the ‘paradox of the plankton’. A promising approach to solve this paradox and to explain the coexistence of many species with strong niche overlap is to consider over-compensatory density regulation with its ability to generate endogenous population fluctuations.Previous work has analysed the role of over-compensation in coexistence based on analytical approaches. Using a spatially explicit time-discrete simulation model, we systematically explore the dynamics and conditions for coexistence of two species. We go beyond the analytically accessible range of models by studying the whole range of density regulation from under- to very strong over-compensation and consider the impact of spatial structure and temporal disturbances. In particular, we investigate how coexistence can emerge in different types of population growth models.We show that two strong competitors are able to coexist if at least one species exhibits over-compensation. Analysing the time series of population dynamics reveals how the differential responses to density fluctuations of the two competitors lead to coexistence: The over-compensator generates density fluctuations but is the inferior competitor at strong amplitudes of those fluctuations; the competitor, therefore, becomes frequent and dampens the over-compensator's amplitudes, but it becomes inferior under dampened fluctuations.These species interactions cause a dynamic alternation of community states with long-term persistence of both species. We show that a variety of population growth models is able to reproduce this coexistence although the particular parameter ranges differ among the models. Spatial structure influences the probability of coexistence but coexistence is maintained for a broad range of dispersal parameters.The flexibility and robustness of coexistence through over-compensation emphasize the importance of nonlinear density dependence for species interactions, and they also highlight the potential of applying more flexible models than the classical Lotka-Volterra equations in community ecology.