Structural Model of the Human BTG2–PABPC1 Complex by Combining Mutagenesis,NMR Chemical Shift Perturbation Data and Molecular Docking

Degradation of cytoplasmic mRNA in eukaryotes involves the shortening and removal of the mRNA poly(A) tail by poly(A)-selective ribonuclease (deadenylase) enzymes. In human cells, BTG2 can stimulate deadenylation of poly(A) bound by cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding protein PABPC1. This involves the concurrent binding by BTG2 of PABPC1 and the Caf1/CNOT7 nuclease subunit of the Ccr4-Not deadenylase complex. To understand in molecular detail how PABPC1 and BTG2 interact, we set out to identify amino acid residues of PABPC1 and BTG2 contributing to the interaction. To this end, we first used algorithms to predict PABPC1 interaction surfaces. Comparison of the predicted interaction surface with known residues involved in the binding to poly(A) resulted in the identification of a putative interaction surface for BTG2. Subsequently, we used pulldown assays to confirm the requirement of PABPC1 residues for the interaction with BTG2. Analysis of RNA-binding by PABPC1 variants indicated that PABPC1 residues required for interaction with BTG2 do not interfere with poly(A) binding. After further defining residues of BTG2 that are required for the interaction with PABPC1, we used information from published NMR chemical shift perturbation experiments to guide docking and generate a structural model of the BTG2-PABPC1 complex. A quaternary poly(A)-PABPC1-BTG2-Caf1/CNOT7 model showed that the 3′ end of poly(A) RNA is directed towards the catalytic centre of Caf1/CNOT7, thereby providing a rationale for enhanced deadenylation by Caf1/CNOT7 in the presence of BTG2 and PABPC1.     

RNA degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisae

All RNA species in yeast cells are subject to turnover. Work over the past 20 years has defined degradation mechanisms for messenger RNAs, transfer RNAs, ribosomal RNAs, and noncoding RNAs. In addition, numerous quality control mechanisms that target aberrant RNAs have been identified. Generally, each decay mechanism contains factors that funnel RNA substrates to abundant exo- and/or endonucleases. Key issues for future work include determining the mechanisms that control the specificity of RNA degradation and how RNA degradation processes interact with translation, RNA transport, and other cellular processes.     

Temporal Control of Metabolic Amplitude by Nocturnin

1. Download high-res image (212KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

Human DDX6 effects miRNA-mediated gene silencing via direct binding to CNOT1

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play critical roles in a variety of biological processes through widespread effects on protein synthesis. Upon association with the miRNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC), miRNAs repress target mRNA translation and accelerate mRNA decay. Degradation of the mRNA is initiated by shortening of the poly(A) tail by the CCR4–NOT deadenylase complex followed by the removal of the 5′ cap structure and exonucleolytic decay of the mRNA. Here, we report a direct interaction between the large scaffolding subunit of CCR4–NOT, CNOT1, with the translational repressor and decapping activator protein, DDX6. DDX6 binds to a conserved CNOT1 subdomain in a manner resembling the interaction of the translation initiation factor eIF4A with eIF4G. Importantly, mutations that disrupt the DDX6–CNOT1 interaction impair miRISC-mediated gene silencing in human cells. Thus, CNOT1 facilitates recruitment of DDX6 to miRNA-targeted mRNAs, placing DDX6 as a downstream effector in the miRNA silencing pathway.     

The RNA binding domain of Pumilio antagonizes poly-adenosine binding protein and accelerates deadenylation

PUF proteins are potent repressors that serve important roles in stem cell maintenance, neurological processes, and embryonic development. These functions are driven by PUF protein recognition of specific binding sites within the 3′ untranslated regions of target mRNAs. In this study, we investigated mechanisms of repression by the founding PUF, Drosophila Pumilio, and its human orthologs. Here, we evaluated a previously proposed model wherein the Pumilio RNA binding domain (RBD) binds Argonaute, which in turn blocks the translational activity of the eukaryotic elongation factor 1A. Surprisingly, we found that Argonautes are not necessary for repression elicited by Drosophila and human PUFs in vivo. A second model proposed that the RBD of Pumilio represses by recruiting deadenylases to shorten the mRNA''s polyadenosine tail. Indeed, the RBD binds to the Pop2 deadenylase and accelerates deadenylation; however, this activity is not crucial for regulation. Rather, we determined that the poly(A) is necessary for repression by the RBD. Our results reveal that poly(A)-dependent repression by the RBD requires the poly(A) binding protein, pAbp. Furthermore, we show that repression by the human PUM2 RBD requires the pAbp ortholog, PABPC1. Pumilio associates with pAbp but does not disrupt binding of pAbp to the mRNA. Taken together, our data support a model wherein the Pumilio RBD antagonizes the ability of pAbp to promote translation. Thus, the conserved function of the PUF RBD is to bind specific mRNAs, antagonize pAbp function, and promote deadenylation.