Simultaneous butyrate oxidation by Syntrophomonas wolfei and catalytic olefin reduction in absence of interspecies hydrogen transfer

Methanogenesis by a Syntrophomonas wolfei/ Methanospirillum hungatei coculture was inhibited in presence of ethylene and the hydrogenation catalyst Pd-BaSO₄. However, butyrate oxidation by S. wolfei continued and ethylene was reduced to ethane. Per mol of butyrate oxidized, 2.4 mol acetate was produced and 0.8 mol ethylene was reduced. Acetylene, propylene and butene were less effective as H₂ acceptors than ethylene, and addition of bromoethanesulfonic acid was necessary to inhibit methanogenesis in the presence of the two longer-chain olefins. Other hydrogenation catalysts were less effective in the order Pd-charcoal < PE-asbestos < Pd-PEI beads < Pt-Al₂O₃, Pd-CaCO₃. Optimal ethylene hydrogenation was achieved with still incubation in presence of 7.2 mg Pd-BaSO₄ and 0.7 g sand per ml medium. The higher catabolic rate of S. wolfei in presence of the methanogen indicated that the biological H₂ removal mechanism was more efficient than the catalytic olefin reduction.Abbreviations BES bromoethane sulfonic acid - VFA volatile fatty acid     

Energetics of syntrophic ethanol oxidation in defined chemostat cocultures

The ethanol-oxidizing, proton-reducing Pelobacter acetylenicus was grown in chemostat cocultures with either Acetobacterium woodii, Methanobacterium bryantii, or Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Stable steady state conditions with tightly coupled growth were reached at various dilution rates between 0.02 and 0.14 h^-1. Both ethanol and H₂ steady state concentrations increased with growth rate and were lower in cocultures with the sulfate reducer < methanogen < homoacetogen. Due to the higher affinity for H₂, D. desulfuricans outcompeted M. bryantii, and this one A. woodii when inoculated in cocultures with P. acetylenicus. Cocultures with A. woodii had lower H₂ steady state concentrations when bicarbonate reduction was replaced by the energetically more favourable caffeate reduction. Similarly, cocultures with D. desulfuricans had lower H₂ concentrations with nitrate than with sulfate as electron acceptor. The Gibbs free energy (G) available to the H₂-producing P. acetylenicus was independent of growth rate and the H₂-utilizing partner, whereas the G available to the latter increased with growth rate and the energy yielding potential of the H₂ oxidation reaction. The critical Gibbs free energy (G_c), i.e. the minimum energy required for H₂ production and H₂ oxidation, was-5.5 to-8.0 kJ mol^-1 H₂ for P. acetylenicus,-5.1 to-6.3 kJ mol^-1 H₂ for A. woodii,-7.5 to-9.1 kJ mol^-1 H₂ for M. bryantii, and-10.3 to-12.3 kJ mol^-1 H₂ for D. desulfuricans. Obviously, the potentially available energy was used more efficiently by homoacetogens > methanogens > sulfate reducers.     

5,6,7,8-Tetrahydromethanopterin-dependent enzymes involved in methanogenesis

Abstract In the process of methanogenesis, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydromethanopterin (H₄MPT) is the carrier of the C₁ unit at the formyl through methyl state of reduction. By the transfer of a formyl group from formylmethanofuran, 5-formyl- and 10-formyl-H₄MPT are formed in hydrogenotrophic and methylotrophic organisms, respectively. Cyclohydrolysis of the 5- and 10-formyl derivatives then yields 5,10-methenyl-H₄MPT, which is reduced in two subsequent coenzyme F₄₂₀-dependent reactions to 5-methyl-H₄MPT. Following the transfer of the methyl group to coenzyme M, the substrate of the terminal step in methanogenesis, methylcoenzyme M, is produced. In this paper properties of the enzymes catalyzing the individual H₄MPT-dependent reactions are discussed.     

Dimethyl sulfide metabolism in salt marsh sediments

Abstract Anoxic sediment slurries prepared from Spartina salt marsh soils contained dimethyl sulfide (DMS) at concentrations ranging from 1 to 10 μM. DMS was produced in slurries over the initial 1–24 h incubation. After the initial period of production, DMS decreased to undetectable levels and methane thiol (MSH) was produced. Inhibition of methanogenesis caused a 20% decrease in the rate of DMS consumption, while inhibition of sulfate reduction caused a 80% decrease in DMS consumption. When sulfate reduction and methanogenesis were simultaneously inhibited, DMS did not decrease. DMS contributed about 28% to the methane production rate, while DMS probably contributed only 1% or less to the sulfate reduction rate. Incubation of the sediment slurries under an atmosphere of air resulted in similar DMS consumption compared to anaerobic incubations, but MSH and CH₄ were not evolved.
Sediments from the marsh released significant quantities of DMS when treated with cold alkali, indicating that potentially significant sources of DMS existed in the sediments. Values of base-hydrolyzable DMS as high as 190 μmol per liter of sediment were observed near the sediment surface, and values always decreased with depth in the sediment. Simple flux experiments with small intact sediment cores, showed that DMS was emitted from the marsh surface when cores were injected with glutaraldehyde or molybdate and 2-bromoethanesulfonate (BES), but nit when cores were left uninhibited. These results showed that DMS was readily metabolized by microbes in marsh sediments and that this metabolism may be responsible for reducing the emission of DMS from the marsh surface.     

Anaerobic biotransformations of pollutant chemicals in aquifers

Summary Anaerobic microbial communities sampled from either a methanogenic or sulfate-reducing aquifer site have been tested for their ability to degrade a variety of groundwater pollutants, including halogenated aromatic compounds, simple alkyl phenols and tetrachloroethylene. The haloaromatic chemicals were biodegraded in methanogenic incubations but not under sulfate-reducing conditions. The primary degradative event was typically the reductive removal of the aryl halides. Complete dehalogenation of the aromatic moiety was required before substrate mineralization was observed. The lack of dehalogenation activity in sulfatereducing incubations was due, at least in part, to the high levels of sulfate rather than a lack of metabolic potential. In contrast, the degradation of cresol isomers occurred in both types of incubations but proved faster under sulfate-reducing conditions. The requisite microorganisms were enriched and the degradation pathway forp-cresol under the latter conditions involved the anaerobic oxidation of the aryl methyl group. Tetrachloroethylene was also degraded by reductive dehalogenation but under both incubation conditions. The initial conversion of this substrate to trichloroethylene was generally faster under methanogenic conditions. However, the transformation pathway slowed when dichloroethylene was produced and only trace concentrations of vinyl chloride were detected. These results illustrate that pollutant compounds can be biodegraded under anoxic conditions and a knowledge of the predominant ecological conditions is essential for accurate predictions of the transport and fate of such materials in aquifers.     

Isolation and characterization of a new thermophilic and autotrophic methane producing bacterium:Methanobacterium thermoaggregans spec. nov.

Methanobacterium thermoaggregans is a new thermophilic autotrophic rod-shaped methane producing bacterium. The organism likes to form aggregates during growth and utilizes only H₂ and CO₂ as substrates. Growth optimum is at 65°C with a doubling time of 3.5 h. Optimal growth occurs at pH-values between 7 and 7.5. The addition of yeast extract to the mineral salt medium stimulates growth. The DNA base composition is 42 mol% G+C. The organism was isolated from mud taken from a cattle pasture. Because of its optimal growth temperature and its tendency to form aggregates the nameMethanobacterium thermoaggregans is suggested.Abbreviations G+C Guanine+cytosine     

Methanogenesis from methanol in Methanosarcina barkeri studied using membrane inlet mass spectrometry

Abstract A mass spectrometer with membrane inlet was used to study methanol metabolism by Methanosarcina barkeri strain MS. The addition of methanol to methanol grown culture samples in the mass spectrometer vessel stimulated methanogenesis and hydrogen production. The apparent K _s for methanol was determined as 0.5 mM and the V _max as 8.14 mmol g (dry weight) h⁻¹. The V _max for methane production was fairly constant during growth of the culture on methanol implying that growth is tightly coupled to methanogenesis. The addition of methanol to culture samples in the mass spectrometer vessel stimulated methanogenesis with no lag which indicated that methanogenesis can be uncoupled from growth. Exposure of the culture sample in the mass spectrometer vessel to an atmosphere of 2 kPa oxygen for 80 min resulted in a decrease in the rate of methanogenesis from methanol but on returning the atmosphere to nitrogen the addition of further methanol stimulated methanogenesis. The effect of other inhibitors of methanogenesis (2-bromoethane sulphonate and monensin); K _j values 21.5 μM and 0.3 mM, respectively) were also studied.     

The effect of sulfate reduction on the thermophilic (55°C) methane fermentation process

Summary The continuously operated suspended growth anaerobic contact system was utilized to estimate the effect of sulfate reduction on the thermophilic (55°C) methane fermentation process. Results indicated that reduction in methanogenesis in the presence of sulfate was due to two separate, but related, processes;i.e. competitive and sulfide inhibition. Although prevention of competitive inhibition would be difficult under normal fermenter operation, sulfide inhibition could be minimized by environmental selection of sulfide tolerant microbial populations through biomass recycle and pH control. Stable fermenter operation was achieved at soluble sulfide concentrations as high as 330 mg/l soluble sulfide. Using batch fermenters, a maximum thermophilic sulfate reduction rate of 3.7 mg SO₄ ^2––S/g volatile solids (VS)-day was estimated. The importance of reporting sulfate reduction rates on a biomass basis is demonstrated by a simple population adjustment kinetic model.This research study was conducted at the Department of Agricultural Engineering, Cornell University, Riley Robb Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, U.S.A.     

Sulfate reduction in methanogenic bioreactors

Abstract: In the anaerobic treatment of sulfate-containing wastewater, sulfate reduction interferes with methanogenesis. Both mutualistic and competitive interactions between sulfate-reducing bacteria and methanogenic bacteria have been observed. Sulfate reducers will compete with methanogens for the common substrates hydrogen, formate and acetate. In general, sulfate reducers have better growth kinetic properties than methanogens, but additional factors which may be of importance in the competition are adherence properties, mixed substrate utilization, affinity for sulfate of sulfate reducers, relative numbers of bacteria, and reactor conditions such as pH, temperature and sulfide concentration. Sulfate reducers also compete with syntrophic methanogenic consortia involved in the degradation of substrates like propionate and butyrate. In the absence of sulfate these methanogenic consortia are very important, but in the presence of sulfate they are thought to be easily outcompeted by sulfate reducers. However, at relatively low sulfate concentrations, syntrophic degradation of propionate and butyrate coupled to HZ removal via sulfate reduction rather than via methanogenesis may become important. A remarkable feature of some sulfate reducers is their ability to grow fermentatively or to grow in syntrophic association with methanogens in the absence of sulfate.