Models of optimal foraging and resource partitioning: deep corollas for long tongues

We model the optimal foraging strategies for 2 nectarivore species,differing in the length of their proboscis, that exploit thenectar provided by 2 types of flowers, differing in the depthsof their corollas. When like flowers appear in clumps, nectarivoresmust decide whether to forage at a patch of deep or shallowflowers. If nectarivores forage optimally, at least one flowertype will be used by a single nectarivore species. Long-tonguedforagers will normally visit deep flowers and short-tonguedforagers shallow flowers, although extreme asymmetries in metaboliccosts may lead to the opposite arrangement. When deep and shallowflowers are randomly interspersed, nectarivores must decide,on encounter with a flower, whether to collect its nectar orcontinue searching. At low nectarivore densities, the optimalstrategy involves exploiting every encountered flower; however,as nectarivore densities increase and resources become scarce,long-tongued individuals should start concentrating on deepflowers and short-tongued individuals on shallow flowers. Therefore,regardless of the spatial distribution of flowers, corolla depthcan determine which nectarivore species exploit the nectar fromeach flower type in a given community. It follows that corollaelongation can evolve as a means to keep nectar thieves at bayif short-tongued visitors are less efficient pollinators thanlong-tongued visitors.     

Feeding experience and relative size modify the begging strategies of nestlings

The offspring of birds and mammals use a combination of movementsand vocalizations, known as begging, to solicit food from theirparents. A widespread interpretation of begging is that itconstitutes an honest signal of offspring need. But we knowthat in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus) the intensityof begging calls reflects the past experience of offspringin addition to their need. Here we show that this result generalizesto other species. An experiment with hand-reared magpies (Pica pica) and great spotted cuckoos (Clamator glandarius) indicates that the begging strategies depend on the past experience ofchicks and the composition of their brood. In asynchronoustwo-magpie broods, both chicks begged at the same intensitywhen the large chick obtained food more easily than its sibling,but the large chick begged at higher intensity when it was easier for the smaller chick to obtain food. Cuckoo chicks beggedat higher intensity than magpies.     

Effects of begging on growth rates of nestling chicks

We investigated whether an increase in begging levels delaysgrowth of chicks. In experiment 1, we hand-reared nine pairsof ring dove squabs, divided into a control and a begging group.All squabs received similar amounts of food, but those in thebegging group had to beg for a prolonged period in order tobe fed, while squabs in the control group received food withoutbegging. Squabs stopped responding to the treatment after 10days and, at that time, there was no effect of induced beggingon their body mass. In experiment 2, we hand-reared 27 pairsof magpie chicks for 3 days. The design of experiment 2 wassimilar to that of experiment 1. Daily food intake and beggingaffected growth rates. On average, chicks in the begging groupgrew 0.8 g/day less than control chicks, which represents adecrease of 8.15% in growth rate. Because growth is usuallypositively associated with expected fitness, this demonstratesthat begging is a costly behavior, an assumption routinelymade in models of begging behavior.     

Effect of food deprivation on dominance status in blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii) broods

A pecking hierarchy is normally established in the usual two-chickbrood of the blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii). The senior (first-hatched)chick dominates its smaller sibling and receives a greater shareof parentally provided food. Experimental broods were createdby putting together two unrelated junior chicks of die sameage in a vacated foster nest The state of the chicks was manipulatedby a period of controlled artificial feeding so that each chickunderwent a different level of food deprivation. The resultingdominance relationship depended on the relative food deprivationlevel of the chicks: the hungrier chick normally became dominant.However, die effect of hunger was occasionally overruled bysize difference: when die hungrier chick was much smaller thanits foster sibling, it was unable to gain dominance over itslarger companion. Dominance status is likely to have greatervalue for die hungrier chick, while die cost of fighting shouldbe lower for die larger chick. These results conform to dieevolutionarily stable strategy predicted for games widi asymmetricpayoff and differences in resource holding power.