Ecology of diapausing copepodids of Cyclops kolensis Lill. in reservoirs of the Upper Volga

Cyclops kolensis Lill. forms dense populations in different water-bodies of the Upper Volga basin. In spring, when the other planktonic crustaceans have not yet appeared, C. kolensis is an important food object for fishes. Its active reproduction occurs from April to the beginning of June. A rapid accumulation of stage IV copepodids in the plankton occurs in June and at 12–14° they sink into the pelogene in a diapause stage. During the summer stagnation period the diapausing copepodids are distributed evenly over the bottom; their abundance here is 0.7–0.8 million ind. m^-2 (Rybinsk reservoir). During storms and autumn active water mixing the copepodids together with detritus are disturbed and brought to the deepest, silt rich, part of the water-bodies. After the ice formation and at the beginning of bottom heating the diapausing copepodids are transported by near bottom currents and are concentrated in depressions; their biomass here reaches 60 g m^-3. After the thermo-oxy-cline formation they revive and begin to live actively. Copepodids feed, accumulate adipose matter and in February–March they begin to moult.     

Peptide N-alkylamides by solid phase synthesis

Three new resins have been developed that allow for the solid phase synthesis of C-terminal peptide N-alkylamides using Boc amino acids, usual side chain protecting groups and hydrogen fluoride cleavage and deprotection. These resins were prepared by reacting the appropriate alkylamine (NH2CH3, NH2CH2CH3, NH2CH2CF3) to Merrifield's 1% divinylbenzene cross-linked chloromethylated polystyrene resin. The application of these resins to the synthesis of C-terminal GnRH N-alkylamides illustrates the versatility of this approach. GnRH analogs were tested for their ability to release LH from cultured rat anterior pituitary cells. [DGlu6, Pro9-NHCH2CH3]-GnRH was synthesized for the first time using the solid phase approach and found to be three times more potent than [DGlu6]-GnRH. Other analogs including [DTrp6, Pro9-NHCH2CH3]-GnRH, [DAla6, Pro9-NHCH2CF3]-GnRH and related peptides were found to be equipotent and to have the same properties (HPLC retention times, amino acid analysis and specific rotation) as the corresponding peptides synthesized using less amenable strategies; yields were equivalent or better than those reported earlier.     

Effect of stress on the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis: peripheral and central mechanisms.

This article reviews the mechanisms believed to mediate stress-induced inhibition of reproductive functions and the anatomical sites at which these effects take place. Particular emphasis is placed on the potential modulating role of hormones or neurotransmitters released during stress. At the level of the gonads, adrenal corticoids, pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC)-like peptides, and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) are reported to interfere with the stimulatory action of gonadotropins on sex steroid-producing cells. Increased circulating corticosteroid levels may also decrease pituitary responsiveness to GnRH. There is, however, increasing evidence that these mechanisms are primarily involved in mediating the effects of prolonged stress, but not those of an acute stimulus. In contrast, a variety of hormones or neurotransmitters, including CRF, POMC peptides, and biogenic amines act within the brain to mediate the inhibitory influence of both acute and prolonged stresses on reproductive function.     

Expression and Functional Characterization of Membrane-Integrated Mammalian Corticotropin Releasing Factor Receptors 1 and 2 in Escherichia coli

Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptors (CRFRs) are class B1 G-protein-coupled receptors, which bind peptides of the corticotropin releasing factor family and are key mediators in the stress response. In order to dissect the receptors'' binding specificity and enable structural studies, full-length human CRFR1α and mouse CRFR2β as well as fragments lacking the N-terminal extracellular domain, were overproduced in E. coli. The characteristics of different CRFR2β -PhoA gene fusion products expressed in bacteria were found to be in agreement with the predicted ones in the hepta-helical membrane topology model. Recombinant histidine-tagged CRFR1α and CRFR2β expression levels and bacterial subcellular localization were evaluated by cell fractionation and Western blot analysis. Protein expression parameters were assessed, including the influence of E. coli bacterial hosts, culture media and the impact of either PelB or DsbA signal peptide. In general, the large majority of receptor proteins became inserted in the bacterial membrane. Across all experimental conditions significantly more CRFR2β product was obtained in comparison to CRFR1α. Following a detergent screen analysis, bacterial membranes containing CRFR1α and CRFR2β were best solubilized with the zwitterionic detergent FC-14. Binding of different peptide ligands to CRFR1α and CRFR2β membrane fractions were similar, in part, to the complex pharmacology observed in eukaryotic cells. We suggest that our E. coli expression system producing functional CRFRs will be useful for large-scale expression of these receptors for structural studies.     

Functional relationship between receptor binding and biological activity for analogs of mammalian and salmon gonadotropin-releasing hormones in the pituitary of goldfish (Carassius auratus)

The relationship between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor binding and biological activity in the goldfish pituitary for mammalian and salmon GnRH (sGnRH) analogs with structural modification at the C terminus involving replacement of glycine amide with an alkyl amine and replacement of the Gly6 residue with D amino acids was examined. The GnRH receptor binding data were analyzed with a computerized curve-fitting program (LIGAND) for a single as well as two classes of binding sites; analysis based on one site fit estimated binding affinity and capacity for one class of binding site, and analysis based on two-site fit estimated binding affinity and capacity for two classes of binding sites (high-affinity/low-capacity and low-affinity/high-capacity binding sites). The estimated receptor affinity values were then used to determine the correlation between binding affinity and gonadotropin (GTH)-release potency in vitro. The highest correlation between biological activity and receptor binding affinity was obtained for the high-affinity/low-capacity binding sites and GnRH analogs containing Trp7 and Leu8 residues (i.e., the salmon GnRH structural format) (R = 0.940 +/- 0.150). For the same group of GnRH analogs, there was no significant correlation between the relative GTH-release potency and binding affinity of the low-affinity/high-capacity sites (R = 0.159 +/- 0.434), or that obtained from a one-site fit (R = 0.198 +/- 0.431). Similarly, for mammalian GnRH analogs, significant correlation between binding affinity and biological activity (R = 0.406 +/- 0.049) was only obtained for the high-affinity sites, although the degree of correlation was significantly lower than that obtained for salmon GnRH analogs. The present findings provide strong support for the hypothesis that high-affinity GnRH receptors are involved in the control of GTH release in the goldfish pituitary. In addition, the results demonstrate clearly that the presence of Trp7, Leu8 residues in salmon GnRH molecule, a native peptide in goldfish, is important for recognition of the ligand by the GnRH receptors in the goldfish pituitary, and that structural modifications at positions 6 and 10 in this peptide can increase receptor binding affinity and biological activity at the pituitary level. The most active sGnRH analog identified to date is [D-Arg6, Pro9-NEt]-sGnRH.     

Conformational analysis of a potent SSTR3-selective somatostatin analogue by NMR in water solution.

The three-dimensional structure of a potent SSTR3-selective analogue of somatostatin, cyclo(3-14)H-Cys(3)-Phe(6)-Tyr(7)-D-Agl(8)(N(beta) Me, 2-naphthoyl)-Lys(9)-Thr(10)-Phe(11)-Cys(14)-OH (des-AA(1, 2, 4, 5, 12, 13)[Tyr(7), D-Agl(8)(N(beta) Me, 2-naphthoyl)]-SRIF) (peptide 1) has been determined by (1)H NMR in water and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The peptide exists in two conformational isomers differing mainly by the cis/trans isomerization of the side chain in residue 8. The structure of 1 is compared with the consensus structural motifs of other somatostatin analogues that bind predominantly to SSTR1, SSTR2/SSTR5 and SSTR4 receptors, and to the 3D structure of a non-selective SRIF analogue, cyclo(3-14)H-Cys(3)-Phe(6)-Tyr(7)-D-2Nal(8)-Lys(9)-Thr(10)-Phe(11)-Cys(14)-OH (des-AA(1, 2, 4, 5, 12, 13)[Tyr(7), D-2Nal(8)]-SRIF) (peptide 2). The structural determinant factors that could explain selectivity of peptide 1 for SSTR3 receptors are discussed.     

Two closely linked tomato HKT coding genes are positional candidates for the major tomato QTL involved in Na+/K+ homeostasis

The location of major quantitative trait loci (QTL) contributing to stem and leaf [Na⁺] and [K⁺] was previously reported in chromosome 7 using two connected populations of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of tomato. HKT1;1 and HKT1;2, two tomato Na⁺‐selective class I‐HKT transporters, were found to be closely linked, where the maximum logarithm of odds (LOD) score for these QTLs located. When a chromosome 7 linkage map based on 278 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was used, the maximum LOD score position was only 35 kb from HKT1;1 and HKT1;2. Their expression patterns and phenotypic effects were further investigated in two near‐isogenic lines (NILs): 157‐14 (double homozygote for the cheesmaniae alleles) and 157‐17 (double homozygote for the lycopersicum alleles). The expression pattern for the HKT1;1 and HKT1;2 alleles was complex, possibly because of differences in their promoter sequences. High salinity had very little effect on root dry and fresh weight and consequently on the plant dry weight of NIL 157‐14 in comparison with 157‐17. A significant difference between NILs was also found for [K⁺] and the [Na⁺]/[K⁺] ratio in leaf and stem but not for [Na⁺] arising a disagreement with the corresponding RIL population. Their association with leaf [Na⁺] and salt tolerance in tomato is also discussed.     

On single and multiple models of protein families for the detection of remote sequence relationships

Background  

The detection of relationships between a protein sequence of unknown function and a sequence whose function has been characterised enables the transfer of functional annotation. However in many cases these relationships can not be identified easily from direct comparison of the two sequences. Methods which compare sequence profiles have been shown to improve the detection of these remote sequence relationships. However, the best method for building a profile of a known set of sequences has not been established. Here we examine how the type of profile built affects its performance, both in detecting remote homologs and in the resulting alignment accuracy. In particular, we consider whether it is better to model a protein superfamily using a single structure-based alignment that is representative of all known cases of the superfamily, or to use multiple sequence-based profiles each representing an individual member of the superfamily.