Microbial production of d-amino acids

The production of d-aminoacylase by Alcaligenes denitrificans and Alcaligenes faecalis has been studied. The enzyme was inducibly produced and N-acetyl-d-leucine and N-acetyl-d-valine were the most effective inducers. d-methionine, d-valine, d-phenylalamine and d-leucine were produced by the enzymic hydrolysis of the appropriate N-acetyl-d-amino-acids with whole cell biomass. The hydrolysis of N-acetyl-d-methionine by A. denitrificans and N-acetyl-d-valine by A. faecalis was preferential. Maximum yields of d-methionine and d-valine were 94.3 and 84.7% at a specific product formation rate of 20.10 and 19.19 μmol min⁻¹ mg⁻¹ of wet cells at 20 mM substrate concentration and 5 mg ml⁻¹ of cell density.     

Salinity stress responses in the plant growth promoting rhizobacteria,Azospirillum spp

In order to adapt to the fluctuations in soil salinity/osmolarity the bacteria of the genusAzospirillum accumulate compatible solutes such as glutamate, proline, glycine betaine, trehalose, etc. Proline seems to play a major role in osmoadaptation. With increase in osmotic stress the dominant osmolyte inA. brasilense shifts from glutamate to proline. Accumulation of proline inA. brasilense occurs by both uptake and synthesis. At higher osmolarityA. brasilense Sp7 accumulates high intracellular concentration of glycine betaine which is taken up via a high affinity glycine betaine transport system. A salinity stress induced, periplasmically located, glycine betaine binding protein (GBBP) of ca. 32 kDa size is involved in glycine betaine uptake inA. brasilense Sp7. Although a similar protein is also present inA. brasilense Cd it does not help in osmoprotection. It is not known ifA. brasilense Cd can also accumulate glycine betaine under salinity stress and if the GBBP-like protein plays any role in glycine betaine uptake. This strain, under salt stress, seems to have inadequate levels of ATP to support growth and glycine betaine uptake simultaneously. ExceptA. halopraeferens, all other species ofAzospirillum lack the ability to convert choline into glycine betaine. Mobilization of thebet ABT genes ofE. coli intoA. brasilense enables it to use choline for osmoprotection. Recently, aproU-like locus fromA. lipoferum showing physical homology to theproU gene region ofE. coli has been cloned. Replacement of this locus, after inactivation by the insertion of kanamycin resistance gene cassette, inA. lipoferum genome results in the recovery of mutants which fail to use glycine betaine as osmoprotectant.     

Structural investigations into the binding mode of novel neolignans Cmp10 and Cmp19 microtubule stabilizers by in silico molecular docking,molecular dynamics,and binding free energy calculations

Microtubule stabilizers provide an important mode of treatment via mitotic cell arrest of cancer cells. Recently, we reported two novel neolignans derivatives Cmp10 and Cmp19 showing anticancer activity and working as microtubule stabilizers at micromolar concentrations. In this study, we have explored the binding site, mode of binding, and stabilization by two novel microtubule stabilizers Cmp10 and Cmp19 using in silico molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, and binding free energy calculations. Molecular docking studies were performed to explore the β-tubulin binding site of Cmp10 and Cmp19. Further, MD simulations were used to probe the β-tubulin stabilization mechanism by Cmp10 and Cmp19. Binding affinity was also compared for Cmp10 and Cmp19 using binding free energy calculations. Our docking results revealed that both the compounds bind at Ptxl binding site in β-tubulin. MD simulation studies showed that Cmp10 and Cmp19 binding stabilizes M-loop (Phe272-Val288) residues of β-tubulin and prevent its dynamics, leading to a better packing between α and β subunits from adjacent tubulin dimers. In addition, His229, Ser280 and Gln281, and Arg278, Thr276, and Ser232 were found to be the key amino acid residues forming H-bonds with Cmp10 and Cmp19, respectively. Consequently, binding free energy calculations indicated that Cmp10 (?113.655 kJ/mol) had better binding compared to Cmp19 (?95.216 kJ/mol). This study provides useful insight for better understanding of the binding mechanism of Cmp10 and Cmp19 and will be helpful in designing novel microtubule stabilizers.     

Interaction of cobalt(II) and copper(II) hydroxamates with polyriboadenylic acid: An insight into RNA based drug designing

The polyadenylic acid [poly(A)] tail of mRNA plays a noteworthy role in the initiation of the translation, maturation, and stability of mRNA. It also significantly contributes to the production of alternate proteins in eukaryotic cells. Hence, it has recently been recognized as a prospective drug target. Binding affinity of bis(N-p-tolylbenzohydroxamato)Cobalt(II), [N-p-TBHA-Co(II)] (1) and bis(N-p-naphthylbenzohydroxamato)Copper(II), [N-p-NBHA-Cu(II)] (2) complexes with poly(A) have been investigated by biophysical techniques namely, absorption spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy, circular dichroism spectroscopy, viscometric measurements and through molecular docking studies. The intrinsic binding constants (K_b) of complexes were determined following the order of N-p-TBHA-Co(II)] > N-p-NBHA-Cu(II), along with hyperchromism and a bathochromic shift for both complexes. The fluorescence quenching method revealed an interaction between poly(A)-N-p-TBHA-Co(II)/poly(A)-N-p-NBHA-Cu(II). The mode of binding was also determined via the fluorescence ferrocyanide quenching method. The increase in the viscosity of poly(A) that occurred from increasing the concentration of the N-p-TBHA-Co(II)/N-p-NBHA-Cu(II) complex was scrutinized. The characteristics of the interaction site of poly(A) with N-p-TBHA-Co(II)/N-p-NBHA-Cu(II) were adenine and phosphate groups, as revealed by DRS-FTIR spectroscopy. Based on these observations, a partial intercalative mode of the binding of poly(A) has been proposed for both complexes. Circular dichroism confirmed the interaction of both the complexes with poly(A). The molecular docking results illustrated that complexes strongly interact with poly(A) via the relative binding energies of the docked structure as ?259.39eV and ?226.30eV for N-p-TBHA-Co(II) and N-p-NBHA-Cu(II) respectively. Moreover, the binding affinity of N-p-TBHA-Co(II) is higher in all aspects than N-p-NBHA-Cu(II) for poly(A).