Keratin-positive reticulum cells in fine needle aspirates and touch imprints of hyperplastic lymph nodes. A possible pitfall in the immunocytochemical diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma.

Fine needle aspirates and touch imprints of 36 hyperplastic (reactive) lymph nodes were tested for the presence of keratin and desmin. Keratin-positive cells with morphologic characteristics corresponding to extrafollicular (fibroblastic) reticulum cells were found in 18% of the fine needle aspirates and 42% of the touch imprints. The number of keratin-positive reticulum cells varied from 1 to greater than 30 per slide. Desmin-positive cells with similar morphology were found in 23% of fine needle aspirates and 37% of touch imprints, and the number of such cells per slide ranged from 2 to greater than 70. The relatively frequent occurrence of keratin-positive reticulum cells in these preparations from hyperplastic lymph nodes should be taken into account if keratin antibodies are used to search for carcinoma micrometastases.     

Functional evidence for three distinct and independently inhibitable adhesion activities mediated by the human integrin VLA-4. Correlation with distinct alpha 4 epitopes.

The human integrin VLA (very late activation antigens)-4 (CD49d/CD29), the leukocyte receptor for both the CS-1 region of plasma fibronectin (Fn) and the vascular cell surface adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), also mediates homotypic aggregation upon triggering with specific anti-VLA-4 monoclonal antibody (mAb). Epitope mapping of this integrin on the human B-cell line Ramos, performed with a wide panel of anti-VLA-4 mAb by both cross-competitive cell binding and protease sensitivity assays, revealed the existence of three topographically distinct epitopes on the alpha 4 chain, referred to as epitopes A-C. By testing this panel of anti-VLA-4 mAb for inhibition of cell binding to both a 38-kDa Fn fragment containing CS-1 and to VCAM-1, as well as for induction and inhibition of VLA-4 mediated homotypic cell adhesion, we have found overlapping but different functional properties associated with each epitope. Anti-alpha 4 mAb recognizing epitope B inhibited cell attachment to both Fn and VCAM-1, whereas mAb against epitope A did not block VCAM-1 binding and only partially inhibited binding to Fn. In contrast, mAb directed to epitope C did not affect cell adhesion to either of the two VLA-4 ligands. All mAb directed to site A, as well as a subgroup of mAb recognizing epitope B (called B2), were able to induce cell aggregation, but this effect was not exerted by mAb specific to site C and by a subgroup against epitope B (called B1). Moreover, although anti-epitope C and anti-epitope B1 mAb did not trigger aggregation, those mAb blocked aggregation induced by anti-epitope A or B2 mAb. In addition, anti-epitope A mAb blocked B2-induced aggregation, and conversely, anti-epitope B2 mAb blocked A-induced aggregation. Further evidence for multiple VLA-4 functions is that anti-Fn and anti-VCAM-1 antibodies inhibited binding to Fn or to VCAM-1, respectively, but did not affect VLA-4-mediated aggregation. In summary, we have demonstrated that there are at least three different VLA-4-mediated adhesion functions, we have defined three distinct VLA-4 epitopes, and we have correlated these epitopes with the different functions of VLA-4.     

Ants,Plants and Butterflies as Diversity Indicators: Comparisons between Strata at six Forest Sites in Venezuela

At six different forest sites in Venezuela, we estimated the diversity and abundance of ants and nymphalid butterflies on the ground and in the canopy, and of plants. Statistical analysis using eight different diversity indices for each species group revealed large variations among them. Ground ants appeared to be the most reliable bioindicators, even when only the five most common species are considered. Results showed in addition that ground ant diversity is correlated to that of canopy ants and that vegetational diversity is linked to butterfly diversity but not to that of canopy ants. Ant species diversity in the canopy was always less than that on the ground. We conclude that no simple index or single taxon describes completely complex ecosystems, thus, biodiversity assessments require tools still to be developed.