A simplified assay for the enzyme responsible for the attachment of myristic acid to the N-terminal glycine residue of proteins, myristoyl-CoA: glycylpeptide N-myristoyltransferase.

A greatly simplified assay for myristoyl-CoA:glycylpeptide N-myristoyltransferase (NMT) activity is described. The assay is based on the differential solubility of the acyl-peptides produced as a consequence of the NMT activity and yields results comparable with those obtained with the original assay described by Towler & Glaser [(1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83, 2812-2816], which requires h.p.l.c. to determine the production of the acyl-peptides. The use of the revised assay in the preliminary steps of the purification of rat brain NMT is described, and its use in determining the fatty acid-specificity of the enzyme is illustrated. The results are shown to be comparable with those obtained with the h.p.l.c.-based assay.     

Subjective magnitude of tactile roughness

The subjective experience of tactile roughness was judged by subjects using the method of absolute magnitude estimation (AME). The stimuli were 11 grades of sandpaper having particle diameters ranging from 16 to 905 mum. All of the estimates resulted in power functions when assigned numbers were plotted as a function of particle diameter. It was determined that on the finger pad of the index finger and the thumb there was no difference between the active and passive modes of stimulation and that there was no difference in roughness estimates made on the finger and on the thumb. When the finger and thumb were stimulated simultaneously, higher numbers were assigned for a given stimulus indicating the presence of a form of spatial summation at these sites. The pleasantness of the tactile sensation, as assessed using AME, was inversely related to the roughness estimates. Furthermore, hydration of the stratum corneum with water and three concentrations of surfactant solutions reduced the sensation of roughness below that of normally hydrated skin.     

How do we restore New Zealand's biological heritage by 2050?

If we are to make meaningful and measurable progress in restoring New Zealand's biological heritage by 2050, a range of fundamental issues need to be addressed. These relate not just to restoration science but also to building ecosystem resilience in the wider socio‐economic and cultural context within which restoration occurs.