Parasite diversity and the evolution of diploidy, multicellularity and anisogamy

It may be reasonably assumed that a diversity of parasite genotypes in any one cell or organism is more harmful than a population of uniform genotypes. If this is accepted the following consequences follow: (i) Parasite mixing, due to cytoplasm mixing, at the time of zygote formation is a new and additional cost of sex. The rapid divisions typical of zygotic cleavage may be viewed as an adaptation to minimize the degree of mixing of parasites in each daughter cell. The faster the divisions the less chance parasite populations have to grow and mix. Mitosis is the fastest form of cell division. Prolongation of the diploid phase follows as a consequence of mitosis in a diploid zygote. This view is unusual in that it demands no advantage per se to the possession of two chromosome sets. (ii) The cells of the blastula formed from rapid zygotic divisions are different as regards their symbiotic inclusions. If the right to gametogenesis is restricted, then every replicator symbiont and nuclear genome alike and hence every cell of the developing embryo, will have an incentive to compete. Selection between the clonal blastula cells would result in the cells of low parasite diversity forming the gametes. Thus, germ line restriction is in the interests of the nuclear genome. Controlling the right to gametogenesis is only possible if the blastula remains intact. Hence, multicellularity might have evolved so as to enable the limitation of the right to gametogenesis and hence reduce the parasite diversity of gametes. Inter-cell competition during embryogenesis is central to Buss's seminal notion of the evolution of developmental complexity within the metazoa. The above theory provides the missing motive force behind such competition. (iii) For a given zygote size, the fittest zygotes are those produced by the gametes most disparate in size because these have a lower diversity of parasites. This may be the advantage of anisogamy. The novelty of this new view of anisogamy is that it puts a premium on sperm being very small, in order to exclude parasites from sperm cytoplasm. The hypothesis is briefly tested by examining if there are alternative means of parasite limitation in organisms with large gametes.     

Fleshing Out Vulnerability

In the literature on medical ethics, it is generally admitted that vulnerable persons or groups deserve special attention, care or protection. One can define vulnerable persons as those having a greater likelihood of being wronged – that is, of being denied adequate satisfaction of certain legitimate claims. The conjunction of these two points entails what we call the Special Protection Thesis. It asserts that persons with a greater likelihood of being denied adequate satisfaction of their legitimate claims deserve special attention, care or protection. Such a thesis remains vague, however, as long as we do not know what legitimate claims are. This article aims at dispelling this vagueness by exploring what claims we have in relation to health care – thus fleshing out a claim‐based conception of vulnerability. We argue that the Special Protection Thesis must be enriched as follows: If individual or group X has a greater likelihood of being denied adequate satisfaction of some of their legitimate claims to (i) physical integrity, (ii) autonomy, (iii) freedom, (iv) social provision, (v) impartial quality of government, (vi) social bases of self‐respect or (vii) communal belonging, then X deserves special attention, care or protection. With this improved understanding of vulnerability, vulnerability talk in healthcare ethics can escape vagueness and serve as an adequate basis for practice.     

Round robin investigation of methods for recovering human enteric viruses from sludge

To select a tentative standard method for detection of viruses in sludge the American Society for Testing and Materials D19:24:04:04 Subcommittee Task Group initiated round robin comparative testing of two procedures that, after initial screening of several methodologies, were found to meet the basic criteria considered essential by the task group. Eight task group member laboratories agreed to perform round robin testing of the two candidate methods, namely, The Environmental Protection Agency or low pH-AlCl3 method and the Glass or sonication-extraction method. Five different types of sludge were tested. For each particular type of sludge, a single laboratory was designated to collect the sludge in a single sampling, make samples, and ship it to the participating laboratories. In most cases, participating laboratories completed all the tests within 48 h of sample arrival. To establish the reproducibility of the methods, each laboratory tested each sludge sample in triplicate for the two candidate virus methods. Each processed sludge sample was quantitatively assayed for viruses by the procedures of each individual round robin laboratory. To attain a more uniform standard of comparison, a sample of each processed sample from all laboratories was reassayed with one cell line and passage number by a single laboratory (Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio). When the data were statistically analyzed, the Environmental Protection Agency method was found to yield slightly higher virus recoveries for all sludge types, except the dewatered sludge. The precisions of both methods were not significantly different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)