Glycoside hydrolases as components of putative carbohydrate biosensor proteins in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Clostridium thermocellum</Emphasis>

The composition of the cellulase system in the cellulosome-producing bacterium, Clostridium thermocellum, has been reported to change in response to growth on different carbon sources. Recently, an extensive carbohydrate-sensing mechanism, purported to regulate the activation of genes coding for polysaccharide-degrading enzymes, was suggested. In this system, CBM modules, comprising extracellular components of RsgI-like anti-σ factors, were proposed to function as carbohydrate sensors, through which a set of cellulose utilization genes are activated by the associated σ^I-like factors. An extracellular module of one of these RsgI-like proteins (Cthe_2119) was annotated as a family 10 glycoside hydrolase, RsgI6-GH10, and a second putative anti-σ factor (Cthe_1471), related in sequence to Rsi24, was found to contain a module that resembles a family 5 glycoside hydrolase (termed herein Rsi24C-GH5). The present study examines the relevance of these two glycoside hydrolases as sensors in this signal-transmission system. The RsgI6-GH10 was found to bind xylan matrices but exhibited low enzymatic activity on this substrate. In addition, this glycoside hydrolase module was shown to interact with crystalline cellulose although no hydrolytic activity was detected on cellulosic substrates. Bioinformatic analysis of the Rsi24C-GH5 showed a glutamate-to-glutamine substitution that would presumably preclude catalytic activity. Indeed, the recombinant module was shown to bind to cellulose, but showed no hydrolytic activity. These observations suggest that these two glycoside hydrolases underwent an evolutionary adaptation to function as polysaccharide binding agents rather than enzymatic components and thus serve in the capacity of extracellular carbohydrate sensors.     

Bergmann's Rule – what's in a name?

Despite the great interest it generates, the definition of Bergmann's Rule is vague and often contested. Debate focuses on whether the rule should be described in terms of pattern or process, what taxa it should apply to and what taxonomic level it should be associated with. Here I review the historical development of studies of Bergmann's Rule. I suggest that Bergmann thought that his rule should be strongest at the intra‐specific level, rather than between closely related species as is usually thought. I argue that the rule is a pattern that can be studied regardless of mechanism in any taxon and at any taxonomic level.     

Life on the edge: carnivore body size variation is all over the place

Evolutionary biologists have long been fascinated by both the ways in which species respond to ecological conditions at the edges of their geographic ranges and the way that species'' body sizes evolve across their ranges. Surprisingly, though, the relationship between these two phenomena is rarely studied. Here, we examine whether carnivore body size changes from the interior of their geographic range towards the range edges. We find that within species, body size often varies strongly with distance from the range edge. However, there is no general tendency across species for size to be either larger or smaller towards the edge. There is some evidence that the smallest guild members increase in size towards their range edges, but results for the largest guild members are equivocal. Whether individuals vary in relation to the distance from the range edges often depends on the way edge and interior are defined. Neither geographic range size nor absolute body size influences the tendency of size to vary with distance from the range edge. Therefore, we suggest that the frequent significant association between body size and the position of individuals along the edge-core continuum reflects the prevalence of geographic size variation and that the distance to range edge per se does not influence size evolution in a consistent way.