Burrowing dynamics and energy cost of transport in the soft-bodied marine invertebrates Polyphysia crassa and Priapulus caudatus

The dynamics and mechanical forces generated during burrowing in Polyphysia crassa (Annelida: Polychaeta) and Priapulus caudatus (Priapulida) were investigated. Both animals live in soft marine muds and burrow by utilizing a direct peristaltic wave alternating with a high internal pressure event which thrusts the anterior part of the body into the substratum. Forces generated during the various phases of a typical burrowing cycle were measured in animals moving beneath the natural substratum at 5±3 °C using electronic transducers and recorder. During 'head' advance Polyphysia generated 0.027 N, and during 'tail' advance 0.020 N, with peak internal pressures averaging 0.95 kPa (= 0.095 N/cm²). Force by Priapulus during head advance and tail advance was 0.081 N and 0.121 N, respectively, with peak internal pressures averaging 2.47 kPa (= 0.247 N/cm²). Polyphysia moves more slowly (0.24 cm/min) than does Priapulus (0.76 cm/min) and expends more energy on mass moved per unit distance. These force measurements during a burrowing cycle were used in place of respirometry as a basis for computation of net cost of transport (NCT) for each animal. NCT for Polyphysia was 635 J kg^-1 m^-1 and for Priapulus was 314Jkg^-1m^-l. Cost of transport for all burrowing animals thus far investigated is high compared to swimming, running and flying. For soft-bodied invertebrates that live an entirely buried existence this high cost must be interpreted in the broader context of the adaptive value of infaunal life, especially protection against predation, and not as simply a means of moving about.     

Isolation of Aeromonas caviae from ice-cream

Sixty-four samples of ice-cream were examined for the presence of Aeromonas species. Culture was by direct inoculation onto xylose deoxycholate citrate agar and into alkaline peptone water. Aeromonas caviae was isolated from three of the 64 samples (4–7%). The potential pathogenic significance of this organism in ice-cream is discussed.     

The rapid and long-lasting growth of grasses following small falls of rain on stony downs in the arid interior of Australia

Abstract Stony downs consist of grassy areas that alternate with areas that have a substantial stone cover. The stone-covered areas are impermeable, and most rain falling on them runs off, substantially increasing the effective rainfall in adjacent grassy areas. As a result, 20–25 mm of rain on stony downs wetted the soil around the grass to a depth of 140–170 mm and allowed sustained grass response. This is much less than the 35–40 mm of rain required for the same response on red clay or grey clay plains. Grasses respond very rapidly after rain. Some have green shoots the day after rain, and all have responded by the second day. Ephemerals dry off in 4–6 weeks, but most tussock grasses still have some green foliage 8–10 weeks after rain. Deeper rooted tussock grasses remain green for so long because most of the moisture that reaches deeper roots after rain remains there. Most moisture loss is through the soil surface and is recognizable as a drying front that descends through the soil profile. Soil above the drying front is nearly air dry (<5% moisture) while soil below the front has substantial moisture (14–16%). By about a month after rain in summer, the drying front is at a depth of about 80–120 mm. This is near the tips of the roots of ephemeral grasses and the ephemerals then dry off rapidly. Only the tips of the leaves of deep rooted grasses like Mitchell grass (Astrebla spp.) dry off. Their leaves continue to remain mostly green during most of the second month after rain and they do not dry off completely until the third month when the drying front reaches the bottom of the main root system.     

The impact of avian predator-scavengers on King Penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus chicks at Marion Island

While ashore King Penguins Aptenodytes patagonicus are fed upon by a guild of five predator-scavenger seabirds. During the winter (April-October) male Southern Giant Petrels Macronectes giganteus killed an estimated 6430 (11.2%) of Marion Island's King Penguin chicks, although most birds only scavenged in the colonies. The rate of predation varied, with peaks in April-May and in September. The proportion of successful attacks was 22.7%. There was a strong correlation between colony size and the rate of accumulation of chick corpses. Kelp Gulls Larus dominicanus and Lesser Sheathbills Chionis minor also scavenged penguin corpses but Northern Giant Petrels M. halli and female Southern Giant Petrels rarely entered the colonies. During the summer predation was mainly by Sub-Antarctic Skuas Catharacta lonnbergi which took eggs and small chicks.