Diverse post-translational modifications of the pannexin family of channel-forming proteins

The pannexin family of channel-forming proteins is composed of 3 distinct but related members called Panx1, Panx2, and Panx3. Pannexins have been implicated in many physiological processes as well as pathological conditions, primarily through their function as ATP release channels. However, it is currently unclear if all pannexins are subject to similar or different post-translational modifications as most studies have focused primarily on Panx1. Using in vitro biochemical assays performed on ectopically expressed pannexins in HEK-293T cells, we confirmed that all 3 pannexins are N-glycosylated to different degrees, but they are not modified by sialylation or O-linked glycosylation in a manner that changes their apparent molecular weight. Using cell-free caspase assays, we also discovered that similar to Panx1, the C-terminus of Panx2 is a substrate for caspase cleavage. Panx3, on the other hand, is not subject to caspase digestion but an in vitro biotin switch assay revealed that it was S-nitrosylated by nitric oxide donors. Taken together, our findings uncover novel and diverse pannexin post-translational modifications suggesting that they may be differentially regulated for distinct or overlapping cellular and physiological functions.     

Ghrelin amplifies the nicotine-induced dopamine release in the rat striatum

The orexigenic peptide ghrelin plays a prominent role in the regulation of energy balance and in the mediation of reward mechanisms and reinforcement for addictive drugs, such as nicotine. Nicotine is the principal psychoactive component in tobacco, which is responsible for addiction and relapse of smokers. Nicotine activates the mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons via nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAchR). Ghrelin stimulates the dopaminergic neurons via growth hormone secretagogue receptors (GHS-R1A) in the ventral tegmental area and the substantia nigra pars compacta resulting in the release of dopamine in the ventral and dorsal striatum, respectively. In the present study an in vitro superfusion of rat striatal slices was performed, in order to investigate the direct action of ghrelin on the striatal dopamine release and the interaction of ghrelin with nicotine through this neurotransmitter release. Ghrelin increased significantly the dopamine release from the rat striatum following electrical stimulation. This stimulatory effect was reversed by both the selective nAchR antagonist mecamylamine and the selective GHS-R1A antagonist GHRP-6. Nicotine also increased significantly the dopamine release under the same conditions. This stimulatory effect was antagonized by mecamylamine, but not by GHRP-6. Ghrelin further stimulated the nicotine-induced dopamine release and this effect was abolished by mecamylamine and was partially inhibited by GHRP-6. The present results demonstrate that ghrelin stimulates directly the dopamine release and amplifies the nicotine-induced dopamine release in the rat striatum. We presume that striatal cholinergic interneurons also express GHS-R1A, through which ghrelin can amplify the nicotine-induced dopamine release in the striatum. This study provides further evidence of the impact of ghrelin on the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathways. It also suggests that ghrelin signaling may serve as a novel pharmacological target for treatment of addictive and neurodegenerative disorders.     

Adaptor Identity Modulates Adaptation Effects in Familiar Face Identification and Their Neural Correlates

Adaptation-related aftereffects (AEs) show how face perception can be altered by recent perceptual experiences. Along with contrastive behavioural biases, modulations of the early event-related potentials (ERPs) were typically reported on categorical levels. Nevertheless, the role of the adaptor stimulus per se for face identity-specific AEs is not completely understood and was therefore investigated in the present study. Participants were adapted to faces (S1s) varying systematically on a morphing continuum between pairs of famous identities (identities A and B), or to Fourier phase-randomized faces, and had to match the subsequently presented ambiguous faces (S2s; 50/50% identity A/B) to one of the respective original faces. We found that S1s identical with or near to the original identities led to strong contrastive biases with more identity B responses following A adaptation and vice versa. In addition, the closer S1s were to the 50/50% S2 on the morphing continuum, the smaller the magnitude of the AE was. The relation between S1s and AE was, however, not linear. Additionally, stronger AEs were accompanied by faster reaction times. Analyses of the simultaneously recorded ERPs revealed categorical adaptation effects starting at 100 ms post-stimulus onset, that were most pronounced at around 125–240 ms for occipito-temporal sites over both hemispheres. S1-specific amplitude modulations were found at around 300–400 ms. Response-specific analyses of ERPs showed reduced voltages starting at around 125 ms when the S1 biased perception in a contrastive way as compared to when it did not. Our results suggest that face identity AEs do not only depend on physical differences between S1 and S2, but also on perceptual factors, such as the ambiguity of S1. Furthermore, short-term plasticity of face identity processing might work in parallel to object-category processing, and is reflected in the first 400 ms of the ERP.     

Littoral macrophyte–periphyton complexes in two Hungarian shallow waters

Periphyton developing on the surfaces of emergent and submerged aquatic plants has a significant influence on water quality. The periphyton types that form on various plant species can be characterized by their mass values, the proportion of the present organic and inorganic fractions, as well as their chlorophyll-a contents. Studies on periphyton complexes constituting integrated biomonitoring systems are useful to gain essential long-term information about the performance of shallow water bodies. The filtering and settling effect of Phragmites and other aquatic plants, as well as their periphyton was examined and clearly observable in the water areas and non-flooded aquatic habitats belonging to the second phase of Kis-Balaton Protection System, as it was indicated by the mass values and ash contents. The periphyton forming on the aquatic vegetation that annually develops in Kisköre Reservoir and yields a considerable biomass has a critical part in influencing water quality. The only difference (p<0.05) was found in the ash content of the periphyton, being lower in Kis-Balaton (48.64 ± 2.29 S.E., %) and higher in Kisköre Reservoir (57.42 ± 2.54 S.E., %). This paper presents the dry mass of the periphyton, as well as its ash and chlorophyll-a content, and the results obtained on the composition of the alga species of the periphyton.

     

1,5-Hydride shift in Wolff-Kishner reduction of (20R)-3beta,20, 26-trihydroxy-27-norcholest-5-en-22-one: synthetic, quantum chemical, and NMR studies.

Heating (20R)-3beta,20,26-trihydroxy-27-norcholest-5-en-22-one (1) with hydrazine and KOH at 160 degrees C completely converted the steroid to a diastereoisomeric mixture of the new (20R,22RS)-27-norcholest-5-ene-3beta,20,22-triols (2). Exclusive formation of 2 suggests that the expected Wolff-Kishner reduction to a methylene group at the C-22 ketone in 1 was diverted to the C-26 position by a 1,5-hydride shift. All attempts under acid conditions failed to produce a C-22 phenyl hydrazone from 1. However, reaction of 1 was reacted with phenylhydrazine in hot KOH, gave the C-26 phenylhydrazone 4 as the sole product. Evidently, under alkaline conditions, first a hydride ion undergoes an intramolecular transfer from the C-26 CH(2)OH group to the C-22 ketone in 1, and then the phenylhydrazine traps the newly formed aldehyde. To examine this hypothesis, we constructed computer-simulated transition state models from quantum chemical calculations and then compared data from these models with NMR measurements of the reaction mixtures containing 2. The NMR data showed that the C-22 diastereoisomers of 2 are formed in a nearly 1:1 ratio exactly as predicted from the energy-optimized transition states, which were calculated for intramolecular 1,5-hydride shifts that produced each of the two C-22 diastereoisomers. Accordingly, these results support the hypothesis that an intramolecular 1,5-hydride shift mechanism promotes complete conversion of 1 to 2 under classical Wolff-Kishner reduction conditions.     

Involvement of Neurotransmitters in the Action of the Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Peptide-Receptor System on Passive Avoidance Learning in Rats

The nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptor and its endogenous ligand plays role in several physiologic functions of the central nervous system, including pain, locomotion, anxiety and depression, reward and drug addiction, learning and memory. Previous studies demonstrated that the NOP-receptor system induces impairment in memory and learning. However, we have little evidence about the underlying neuromodulation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the involvement of distinct neurotransmitters in the action of the selective NOP receptor agonist orphan G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) SP9155 P550 on memory consolidation in a passive avoidance learning test in rats. Accordingly, rats were pretreated with a nonselective muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist, atropine, a γ-aminobutyric acid subunit A (GABA-A) receptor antagonist, bicuculline, a D2, D3, D4 dopamine receptor antagonist, haloperidol, a nonselective opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone, a non-specific nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, nitro-l-arginine, a nonselective α-adrenergic receptor antagonist, phenoxybenzamine and a β-adrenergic receptor antagonist, propranolol. Atropine, bicuculline, naloxone and phenoxybenzamine reversed the orphan GPCR SP9155 P550-induced memory impairment, whereas propranolol, haloperidol and nitro-l-arginine were ineffective. Our results suggest that the NOP system-induced impairment of memory consolidation is mediated through muscarinic cholinergic, GABA-A-ergic, opioid and α-adrenergic receptors, whereas β-adrenergic, D2, D3, D4-dopaminergic and nitrergic mechanisms are not be implicated.