Hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) control in rice (Oryza sativa) with the bioherbicidal fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. aeschynomene formulated in an invert emulsion

In greenhouse and field experiments, an invert emulsion (MSG 8.25) was tested with dried, formulated spores of the bioherbicidal fungus Colletotrichum gloeosporioides f. sp. aeschynomene, a highly virulent pathogen of the leguminous weed Aeschynomene virginica (northern jointvetch), but considered ‘immune’ against another more serious leguminous weed, Sesbania exaltata (hemp sesbania). A 1:1 (v/v) fungus/invert emulsion mixture resulted in 100% infection and mortality of inoculated hemp sesbania seedlings over a 21-day period under greenhouse conditions. In replicated field tests of the fungus/invert formulation conducted in Stuttgart, AR, and Stoneville, MS, hemp sesbania was controlled 85 and 90%, respectively. These results suggest that this invert emulsion expands the host range of C. gloeosporioides f. sp. aeschynomene, with a concomitant improvement of the bioherbicidal potential of this pathogen.     

Field performance of STG06L-35-061, a new genetic resource developed from crosses between weed-suppressive indica rice and commercial southern U.S. long-grains

Aims

Weed control in rice is challenging, particularly in light of increased resistance to herbicides in weed populations including Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. Indica rice cultivars can produce high yields and suppress barnyardgrass, but have not been commercially acceptable in the U.S. due to inferior agronomic traits and grain quality. Our objectives were to combine high yield and weed-suppressive characteristics from indica cultivars with commercially acceptable grain quality and plant types from long-grain cultivars grown in the southern U.S.

Methods

Crosses between indica and commercial tropical japonica (cv. Katy, and cv. Drew) rice were evaluated for weed suppression and agronomic traits in a breeding program.

Results

In some tests, the selection STG06L-35-061 was nearly as weed suppressive as PI 312777, the suppressive parent, and more suppressive than its tropical japonica parents. Its main crop yield is commercially acceptable, and intermediate between PI 312777 and Katy. Its milling quality and cooking quality are similar to long-grain commercial cultivars, and it has resistance to rice blast disease. Marker analyses identified introgressions from the indica parents on chromosomes 1 and 3 of STG06L-35-061 that require further analysis as possible sources of weed suppressive traits.

Conclusions

STG06L-35-061 might be suitable for organic rice or reduced input conventional systems.     

Delimitation of the maritime boundary in the gulf of Maine area

The compulsory dispute settlement regime included in the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention is recognized as one of the most comprehensive in a modern international convention. Yet, in the recent application of this regime, the question has arisen as to whether the procedural prerequisites associated with the LOS Convention's compulsory dispute settlement mechanism are so arduous as to avoid binding and compulsory jurisdiction in most instances. This article addresses that question by examining, in particular, the reasoning of the Southern Bluefin Tuna arbitration tribunal, which found Article 281 of Section 1 of the LOS Convention to bar jurisdiction to the compulsory dispute settlement mechanism prescribed by the Convention, and offers suggestions as to how states might distinguish or overcome the barriers imposed by the Southern Bluefin Tuna tribunal in future cases.     

Focus on Weed Control: The Impact of Herbicide-Resistant Rice Technology on Phenotypic Diversity and Population Structure of United States Weedy Rice

The use of herbicide-resistant (HR) Clearfield rice (Oryza sativa) to control weedy rice has increased in the past 12 years to constitute about 60% of rice acreage in Arkansas, where most U.S. rice is grown. To assess the impact of HR cultivated rice on the herbicide resistance and population structure of weedy rice, weedy samples were collected from commercial fields with a history of Clearfield rice. Panicles from each weedy type were harvested and tested for resistance to imazethapyr. The majority of plants sampled had at least 20% resistant offspring. These resistant weeds were 97 to 199 cm tall and initiated flowering from 78 to 128 d, generally later than recorded for accessions collected prior to the widespread use of Clearfield rice (i.e. historical accessions). Whereas the majority (70%) of historical accessions had straw-colored hulls, only 30% of contemporary HR weedy rice had straw-colored hulls. Analysis of genotyping-by-sequencing data showed that HR weeds were not genetically structured according to hull color, whereas historical weedy rice was separated into straw-hull and black-hull populations. A significant portion of the local rice crop genome was introgressed into HR weedy rice, which was rare in historical weedy accessions. Admixture analyses showed that HR weeds tend to possess crop haplotypes in the portion of chromosome 2 containing the ACETOLACTATE SYNTHASE gene, which confers herbicide resistance to Clearfield rice. Thus, U.S. HR weedy rice is a distinct population relative to historical weedy rice and shows modifications in morphology and phenology that are relevant to weed management.Weedy rice (Oryza sativa), a conspecific weed of cultivated rice, is a global threat to rice production (Delouche et al., 2007). Classified as the same species as cultivated rice, it is highly competitive (Diarra et al., 1985; Pantone and Baker, 1991; Burgos et al., 2006), difficult to control without damaging cultivated rice, and can cause almost total crop failure (Diarra et al., 1985). The competition of cultivated rice with weedy rice can lead to yield losses from less than 5% to 100% (Kwon et al., 1991; Watanabe et al., 2000; Chen et al., 2004; Ottis et al., 2005; Shivrain et al., 2009b). Besides being difficult to control, weedy rice persists in rice fields because of key weedy traits, including variable emergence (Shivrain et al., 2009b), high degree of seed shattering (Eleftherohorinos, et al., 2002; Thurber et al., 2010), high diversity in seed dormancy (Do Lago, 1982; Noldin, 1995; Vidotto and Ferrero, 2000; Burgos et al., 2011; Tseng et al., 2013), and its seed longevity in soil (Goss and Brown, 1939). Weedy rice is a problem mainly in regions with large farm sizes where direct-seeded rice culture is practiced (Delouche et al., 2007). It is not a major problem in transplanted rice culture, where roguing weeds is possible and hand labor is available. The severity of the problem has increased in recent decades because of the significant shift to direct seeding from transplanting (Pandey and Velasco, 2002; Rao et al., 2007; Chauhan et al., 2013), which is driven by water scarcity (Kummu et al., 2010; Turral et al., 2011), increasing labor costs, and migration of labor to urban areas (Grimm et al., 2008).The herbicide-resistant (HR) Clearfield rice technology (Croughan, 2003) provides an option to control weedy rice in rice using imidazolinone herbicides, in particular, imazethapyr. Imidazolinones belong to group 2 herbicides, also known as ACETOLACTATE SYNTHASE (ALS) inhibitors. Examples of herbicides in this group are imazamox, imazapic, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Developed through mutagenesis of the ALS locus (Croughan, 1998), Clearfield rice was first commercialized in 2002 in the southern U.S. rice belt (Tan et al., 2005). Low levels of natural hybridization are known to occur between the crop and weedy rice. Gene flow generally ranges from 0.003% to 0.25% (Noldin et al., 2002; Song et al., 2003; Messeguer et al., 2004; Gealy, 2005; Shivrain et al., 2007, 2008). After the adoption of Clearfield technology, resistant weedy outcrosses were soon detected in commercial fields (Fig. 1), generally after two cropping seasons of Clearfield rice, where escaped weedy rice was able to produce seed (Zhang et al., 2006; Burgos et al., 2007, 2008). Similar observations have been reported outside the United States, in other regions adopting the technology (Gressel and Valverde, 2009; Busconi et al., 2012).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Suspected herbicide-resistant weedy rice in a rice field previously planted with Clearfield rice along the Mississippi River Delta in Arkansas. More than 10 morphotypes of weedy rice were observed in this field, with different maturity periods. In the foreground is a typical weedy rice with pale green leaves; the rice cultivar has dark green leaves. The inset shows a weedy morphotype that matured earlier than cultivated rice.Despite this complication, the adoption of Clearfield rice technology is increasing, albeit at a slower pace than that of glyphosate-resistant crops. After a decade of commercialization, 57% of the rice area in Arkansas was planted with Clearfield rice cultivars in 2013 (J. Hardke, personal communication). Clearfield technology has been very successful at controlling weedy rice, and polls among rice growers suggest that farmers have kept the problem of HR weeds in check by following the recommended stewardship practices (Burgos et al., 2008). The most notable of these are (1) implementation of herbicide programs that incorporate all possible modes of action available for rice production; (2) ensuring maximum efficacy of the herbicides used; (3) preventing seed production from escaped weedy rice, remnant weedy rice after crop harvest, or volunteer rice and weedy rice in the next crop cycle; (4) rotating Clearfield rice with other crops to break the weedy rice cycle; and (5) practicing zero tillage to avoid burying HR weedy rice seed (Burgos et al., 2008).Clearfield rice has gained a foothold in Asia, where rice cultivation originated (Londo and Schaal, 2007; Zong et al., 2007). Clearfield rice received government support for commercialization in Malaysia in 2010 (Azmi et al., 2012) because of the severity of the weedy rice problem there. Dramatic increases in rice yields (from 3.5 to 7 metric tons ha⁻¹) were reported in Malaysia where Clearfield rice was planted (Sudianto et al., 2013). However, the risk of gene flow and evolution of resistant weedy rice populations is high in the tropics, where up to three rice crops are planted each year, and freezing temperatures, which would reduce the density of volunteer plants, do not occur.In the United States, where Clearfield technology originated and has been used for the longest time, the interaction between HR cultivated rice and weedy rice is not yet fully understood. Two main populations of weedy rice are known to occur in the southern United States and can be found in the same cultivated rice fields. These populations are genetically differentiated, are largely distinct at the phenotypic level, and have separate evolutionary origins (Reagon et al., 2010). One group tends to have straw-colored hulls and is referred to as the SH population; a second group tends to have black-colored hulls and awns and is referred to as the BHA population (Reagon et al., 2010). Genomic evidence suggests that both groups descended from cultivated ancestors but not from the tropical japonica subgroup varieties that are grown commercially in the United States. Instead, the SH group evolved from indica, a subgroup of rice commonly grown in the lowland tropics, and the BHA group descended from aus, a related cultivated subgroup typically grown in Bangladesh and the West Bengal region (Reagon et al., 2010). Weed-weed and weed-crop hybrids are also known to occur, but prior to Clearfield commercialization, these hybrids had occurred at low frequency (Reagon et al., 2010; Gealy et al., 2012). With the advent and increased adoption of Clearfield cultivars, the impact on U.S. weedy rice population structure and the prevalence of the SH and BHA groups are unknown.Efforts to predict the possible consequences of HR or genetically modified rice on weedy rice have been a subject of discussion for many years. Both weedy rice and cultivated rice are primarily self-fertilizing, but, as mentioned above, low levels of gene flow are known to occur. Additional environmental and intrinsic genetic factors can act as prezygotic and postzygotic mating barriers between cultivated and weedy rice and influence the possibility and levels of gene flow between these groups (Craig et al., 2014; Thurber et al., 2014). However, once gene flow occurs between cultivated and weedy rice, and if the resulting hybrids are favored by selection, the resulting morphological, genetic, and physiological changes in weedy rice populations can alter the way that weedy rice evolves and competes. For example, herbicide-resistant weed outcrosses in an experimental field have been observed to be morphologically diverse (Shivrain et al., 2006), with some individuals carrying major weedy traits and well adapted to rice agriculture. Such weedy plants could be more problematic than their normal weedy counterparts. Thus, introgression of crop genes into weedy populations has the potential to change the population dynamic, genetic structure, and morphological profile of weedy plants. This, in turn, must alter our crop management practices. To increase our understanding of the impact of HR rice on the evolution of weedy rice, in this article we aim to (1) assess the frequency of herbicide resistance in weedy rice in southern U.S. rice fields with a history of Clearfield use; (2) characterize the weedy attributes of resistant populations; and (3) determine the genetic origins of herbicide-resistant weeds in U.S. fields.     

DETERMINATION OF GUSTATORY SUCROSE THRESHOLD IN WATER BY USE OF A LINEAR SUCROSE GRADIENT

A novel experimental method was developed which allows the determination of the threshold concentration of sucrose by use of a linear sucrose gradient in water. With this method a continuous tasting of the test-liquid is possible. A panel of 15 persons experienced in taste-testing was used. Three gradients of different steepness were applied: 0 to 1.5% (w/w) sucrose in 2 min (I), 3 min (II) and 4 min (III). The results of the new method were compared with those of the standard method (DIN). With gradients I and II we found values which were significantly higher than those of the standard method (I: 0.49% (w/w); II: 0.46% (w/w); DIN: 0.31% (w/w)), whereas with gradient III the same threshold value was found as with the DIN-Method (III: 0.32% (w/w)).     

Evidence for divergence of response in Indica,Japonica, and wild rice to high CO2 × temperature interaction

High CO₂ and high temperature have an antagonistic interaction effect on rice yield potential and present a unique challenge to adapting rice to projected future climates. Understanding how the differences in response to these two abiotic variables are partitioned across rice germplasm accessions may be key to identifying potentially useful sources of resilient alleles for adapting rice to climate change. In this study, we evaluated eleven globally diverse rice accessions under controlled conditions at two carbon dioxide concentrations (400 and 600 ppm) and four temperature environments (29 °C day/21 °C night; 29 °C day/21 °C night with additional heat stress at anthesis; 34 °C day/26 °C night; and 34 °C day/26 °C night with additional heat stress at anthesis) for a suite of traits including five yield components, five growth characteristics, one phenological trait, and four photosynthesis‐related measurements. Multivariate analyses of mean trait data from these eight treatments divide our rice panel into two primary groups consistent with the genetic classification of INDICA/INDICA‐like and JAPONICA populations. Overall, we find that the productivity of plants grown under elevated [CO₂] was more sensitive (negative response) to high temperature stress compared with that of plants grown under ambient [CO₂] across this diversity panel. We report differential response to CO₂ × temperature interaction for INDICA/INDICA‐like and JAPONICA rice accessions and find preliminary evidence for the beneficial introduction of exotic alleles into cultivated rice genomic background. Overall, these results support the idea of using wild or currently unadapted gene pools in rice to enhance breeding efforts to secure future climate change adaptation.     

Validation of a high-throughput in vitro alkaline elution/rat hepatocyte assay for DNA damage

In vitro alkaline elution is a sensitive and specific short term assay which measures DNA strand breakage in a mammalian test system (primary rat hepatocytes). This lab has previously demonstrated the performance of the assay with known genotoxic and non-genotoxic compounds. The methodology employed has relatively low sample throughput and is labor-intensive, requiring a great deal of manual processing of samples in a format that is not amenable to automation. Here, we present an automated version of the assay. This high-throughput alkaline elution assay (HT-AE) was made possible through 3 key developments: (1) DNA quantitation using PicoGreen and OliGreen fluorescent DNA binding dyes; (2) design and implementation of a custom automation system; and (3) reducing the assay to a 96-well plate format. The assay can now be run with 5-50mg of test compound. HT-AE was validated in a similar manner as the original assay, including assessment of non-genotoxic and non-carcinogenic compounds and evaluation of cytotoxicity to avoid confounding effects of toxicity-associated DNA degradation. The validation test results from compounds of known genotoxic potential were used to set appropriate criteria to classify alkaline elution results for genotoxicity.     

Differential expression of the keratan sulphate proteoglycan,keratocan, during chick corneal embryogenesis

Keratan sulphate (KS) proteoglycans (PGs) are key molecules in the connective tissue matrix of the cornea of the eye, where they are believed to have functional roles in tissue organisation and transparency. Keratocan, is one of the three KS PGs expressed in cornea, and is the only one that is primarily cornea-specific. Work with the developing chick has shown that mRNA for keratocan is present in early corneal embryogenesis, but there is no evidence of protein synthesis and matrix deposition. Here, we investigate the tissue distribution of keratocan in the developing chick cornea as it becomes compacted and transparent in the later stages of development. Indirect immunofluorescence using a new monoclonal antibody (KER-1) which recognises a protein epitope on the keratocan core protein demonstrated that keratocan was present at all stages investigated (E10–E18), with distinct differences in localisation and organisation observed between early and later stages. Until E13, keratocan appeared both cell-associated and in the stromal extracellular matrix, and was particularly concentrated in superficial tissue regions. By E14 when the cornea begins to become transparent, keratocan was located in elongate arrays, presumably associated along collagen fibrils in the stroma. This fibrillar label was still concentrated in the anterior stroma, and persisted through E15–E18. Presumptive Bowman’s layer was evident as an unlabelled subepithelial zone at all stages. Thus, in embryonic chick cornea, keratocan, in common with sulphated KS chains in the E12–E14 developmental period, exhibits a preferential distribution in the anterior stroma. It undergoes a striking reorganisation of structure and distribution consistent with a role in relation to stromal compaction and corneal transparency. E. Claire Gealy and Briedgeen C. Kerr were joint first authors.