The antagonism between somatic growth and testicular activity during different phases in intermoult (stage C4) in sexually mature freshwater crab,Paratelphusa hydrodromous

Summary

In adult males of the freshwater crab Paratelphusa hydrodromous, judging from testicular activity, November-May is the reproductively inactive season and June/July through October the active season. The reproductively active period also represents the mating season of this species. In males over one year old, moulting is an annual event scheduled during June/July and the individual remains in intermoult from July/August to May. This intermoult comprises two phases: (1) the reproductive phase (July/August through October) when the physiological emphasis is more on reproduction and much less on somatic growth (as evidenced by the ability to regenerate autotomized walking limb), (2) the somatic phase (February/March through May) when the emphasis is more on somatic growth and much less on reproduction. Thus there exists an antagonism between reproduction and somatic grown in male P. hydrodromous as already established in the female. Experimental studies suggest that the testicular inactive phase of P. hydrodromous is caused by a possible increase of titre of the gonad-inhibiting hormone (GIH) along with a decrease in titres of the gonad-stimulating hormone (GSH) and androgenic hormone (AH).     

Can Black‐and‐White Ruffed Lemurs (Varecia variegata) Solve Object Permanence Tasks?

We examined object permanence in black‐and‐white‐ruffed lemurs (Varecia variegata) at Zoo Atlanta. A series of visible and invisible displacement tasks with suitable controls were presented to five adult subjects. Subjects performed significantly above chance on all regular tasks, except for the double invisible displacements. Subjects failed visible and invisible controls. Failure on the control trials did not appear to be because subjects used the “last box touched” strategy (subjects did not choose the last box touched significantly more than expected by chance). However, a substantial percentage of choices was made to the last box touched by the experimenter. There was no significant difference between this percentage, and the percentage of choices made to the baited box (on both visible and invisible controls), which indicates that subjects were drawn to both boxes which the experimenter visited/touched, and thus failed the controls. Based on the results from the present study, we believe that there is no evidence that black‐and‐white ruffed lemurs understand visible and invisible tasks in the traditional object permanence battery. Am. J. Primatol. 75:376‐386, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.