Water Deficit Enhanced Cotton Resistance to Spider Mite Herbivory

We investigated the responses of cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.)to the combined effects of soil water deficit and two-spottedspider mite (Tetranychus urticaeKoch) infestation. Two mitetreatments (-M: uninfested, +M: artificially infested 83 d aftersowing), and two water regimes (+W: well watered, -W: waterstressed) were combined factorially in four treatments. Mitecolonies developed at similar rates in well-watered and water-stressedcrops. Despite the similar intensity of infestation, visualsymptoms of mite injury were more marked in well-watered hostplants (+M+W) than in their water-stressed counterparts (+M-W).Lint yield of unstressed controls (-M+W) was 175 g m^-2. In uninfestedcrops, water deficit reduced yield by 30%, mites reduced theyield of well-watered crops by 92%, and the combination of miteinfestation and water deficit reduced yield by 72% (water effect:P<0.01;mite and interaction effect:P<0.0001). Differences in yieldresponses to mites between well-watered and water-stressed cropswere mostly related to differences in reproductive partitioning.The interaction between mites and water deficit was also significantfor other crop variables including canopy temperature, leafwater potential, concentration of nitrogen in reproductive structuresand seed oil concentration. The magnitude and consistency ofthe interaction between both stresses indicates that, underour experimental conditions, mechanisms of adjustment to waterdeficit may have enhanced cotton resistance to mites. This isfurther supported by (a) an increase in specific leaf weightand a parallel increase in leaf penetration resistance due towater deficit; (b) a negative association between macroscopicsymptoms of mite injury and leaf penetration resistance; and(c) a choice test showing that adult female mites preferredto feed and oviposit on leaves from well-watered plants.Copyright1998 Annals of Botany Company Gossypium hirsutumL.;Tetranychus urticaeKoch; leaf water potential; leaf penetration resistance; canopy temperature; multiple stresses; specific leaf weight; radiation use efficiency; nitrogen concentration; reproductive allocation.     

Effects of simulated insect damage and weed interference on cotton growth and reproduction

Early-season insect pests of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) crops, including Lepidoptera larvae and mirids, feed on vegetative buds. The loss of vegetative buds transiently delays the plant's development and growth and has the potential to reduce its competitive ability. Yield reductions due to weed interference and insect damage, therefore, could be greater than expected from the additive effects of weeds and damage acting separately. Three varieties, two levels of weed infestation, and two levels of simulated damage were combined in a factorial experiment designed to assess the responses of cotton plants to the combined effects of damage and weeds. Weed treatments were: with (+W) and without weeds (-W), and damage treatments included: undamaged control (-D) and damaged plants (+D) which had their active vegetative buds removed at 30 and 49 days after sowing. Variety and interactions between variety and other factors were normally nonsignificant for all the response variables measured in this experiment. Cotton height, width, production of flowerbuds and production of fruit were all affected by both damage and weeds. While the effects of damage on these growth variables were transient, the effects of weeds normally increased with time throughout the season. Non-additive effects of weeds and damage were minor for plant height and width, and large for flowerbud and fruit production. At maturity, weed dry matter ranged from about 20 g m^-2 (-W treatments) to 300 gm^-2 (+W), cotton dry matter from 144 gm (+W+D) to 945 gm^-2 (-W-D), and seed cotton production from 54gm^-2 (+W+D) to 417 gnT^-2 (-W+D). Damage did not affect vegetative dry matter and marginally increased seed production in -W plots. Non-additive effects of weeds and damage were negligible for vegetative dry matter but highly significant for seed production (P < 0.0001). These contrasting responses of vegetative and reproductive growth are in agreement with neighbouring models of plant competitive interactions that emphasise the effects of neighbour interference on the fecundity of target plants that are not mediated by changes in target-plant size.     

Profiles of Leaf Senescence During Reproductive Growth of Sunflower and Maize

We investigated the effect of reproductive growth on the profilesof leaf senescence in maize (Zea mays L.) and sunflower (Helianthusannuus L.). Leaf senescence after flowering was assessed usingboth structural (leaf chlorophyll, nitrogen and dry matter)and functional (photosynthesis) variables in undisturbed plants(+G) and in plants in which grain set was prevented (-G). Twoweeks after flowering, lack of grain accelerated senescencein maize and delayed senescence in sunflower as indicated byleaf chlorophyll; leaf nitrogen and dry matter were less sensitiveresponse variables. Lack of interaction between reproductivetreatment and leaf position indicates that the senescence signal,whatever its nature, was equally effective throughout the plantin both species. In both species, feedback inhibition of photosynthesiswas first detected 30–35 d after flowering; excess carbohydratein the leaves was therefore an unlikely trigger of acceleratedsenescence in maize. As reproductive development progressed,differences between +G and -G plants were more marked in sunflower,and tended to disappear or reverse in maize. In sunflower, interactionsbetween leaf position and reproductive treatment—attributableto the local effect of grain—were detected around 20–27d after flowering. Copyright 2000 Annals of Botany Company Helianthus annuus, Zea mays, chlorophyll, light, nitrogen, photosynthesis, reproductive growth, senescence, source-sink, SPAD.