Chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for resected gastric cancer: should we use selection criteria?

BackgroundThe management of gastric adenocarcinoma is essentially based on surgery followed by adjuvant treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) as well as chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) have proven their effectiveness in survival outcomes compared to surgery alone. However, there is little data comparing the two adjuvant approaches. This study aimed to compare the prognosis and survival outcomes of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma operated and treated by adjuvant radio-chemotherapy or chemotherapyMaterials and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 80 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LGC) who received adjuvant treatment. We compared survival outcomes and patterns of recurrence of 53 patients treated by CTRT and those of 27 patients treated by CT.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 38.48 months, CTRT resulted in a significant improvement of the 5-year PFS (60.9% vs. 36%, p = 0.03) and the 5-year OS (55.9% vs. 33%, p = 0.015) compared to adjuvant CT. The 5-year OS was significantly increased by adjuvant CTRT (p = 0.046) in patients with lymph node metastasis, and particularly those with advanced pN stage (p = 0.0078) and high lymph node ratio (LNR) exceeding 25% (p = 0.012). Also, there was a significant improvement of the PFS of patients classified pN2–N3 (p = 0.022) with a high LNR (p = 0.018). CTRT was also associated with improved OS and PFS in patients with lymphovascular and perineural invasion (LVI and PNI) compared to chemotherapy.ConclusionThere is a particular survival benefit of adding radiotherapy to chemotherapy in patients with selected criteria such as lymph node involvement, high LNR LVI, and PNI.     

Genetic analysis of hereditary multiple exostoses in Tunisian families: a novel frame-shift mutation in the <Emphasis Type="Italic">EXT1</Emphasis> gene

Hereditary multiple exostoses (HME) is an autosomal dominant orthopaedic disorder most frequently caused by mutations in the EXT1 gene. The aim of the present study is to determine the underlying molecular defect of HME in two multigenerational Tunisian families with 21 affected members and to examine the degree of intrafamilial variability. Linkage analysis was performed using three microsatellite markers encompassing the EXT1 locus and mutation screening was carried out by direct sequencing. In family 1, evidence for linkage to EXT1 was obtained on the basis of a maximum LOD score of 4.26 at θ = 0.00 with D8S1694 marker. Sequencing of the EXT1 revealed a heterozygous G > T transversion (c.1019G>T) in exon 2, leading to a missense mutation at the codon 340 (p.Arg340Leu). In family 2 we identified a novel heterozygous 1 bp deletion in the exon 1 (c.529_531delA) leading to a premature codon stop and truncated EXT1 protein expression (p.Lys177LysfsX15). This mutation was associated with the evidence of an intrafamilial clinical variability and considered to be a novel disease-causing mutation in the EXT1 gene. These findings provide additional support for the involvement of EXT1 gene in the HME disease.     

Update of the spectrum of GJB2 gene mutations in Tunisian families with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss

Hearing loss is the most frequent sensory disorder. It affects 3 in 1000 newborns. It is genetically heterogeneous with 60 causally-related genes identified to date. Mutations in GJB2 gene account for half of all cases of non-syndromic deafness. The aim of this study was to determine the relative frequency of GJB2 allele variants in Tunisia. In this study, we screened 138 patients with congenital hearing loss belonging to 131 families originating from different parts of Tunisia for mutations in GJB2 gene. GJB2 mutations were found in 39% of families (51/131). The most common mutation was c.35delG accounting for 35% of all cases (46/131). The second most frequent mutation was p.E47X present in 3.8% of families. Four identified mutations in our cohort have not been reported in Tunisia; p.V37I, c.235delC, p.G130A and the splice site mutation IVS1+1G>A (0.76%). These previously described mutations were detected only in families originating from Northern and not from other geographical regions in Tunisia. In conclusion we have confirmed the high frequency of c.35delG in Tunisia which represents 85.4% of all GJB2 mutant alleles. We have also extended the mutational spectrum of GJB2 gene in Tunisia and revealed a more pronounced allelic heterogeneity in the North compared to the rest of the country.