Aquatic bryophytes play a key role in sediment-stressed boreal headwater streams

Hydrobiologia - Forestry-related land use can cause increasing instream sedimentation, burying and eradicating stream bryophytes, with severe ecological consequences. However, there is limited...     

The impact of water-level regulation on littoral macroinvertebrate assemblages in boreal lakes

Regulation of lake water level for power production and flood control is among the major anthropogenic disturbances in boreal aquatic ecosystems. In Finland, over 300 lakes, representing one third of the total inland water area of the country, are artificially regulated. To study the effects of regulation on lake littoral macroinvertebrate communities, samples were taken from upper stony littoral and from lower soft bottom littoral habitats of 11 lakes with different regulation amplitudes (wintertime fall in water level 1.19–6.75 m). Twelve unregulated (wintertime fall in water level 0.11–0.55 m) lakes with otherwise similar characteristics were used as a reference. Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling ordinations showed that the composition of macroinvertebrate assemblages was strongly associated with the amplitude of water level regulation. Taxon richness also decreased with increasing intensity of regulation. Freezing and flushing of sediments in late winter are probably the most important factors leading to the impoverished littoral macroinvertebrate fauna. Invertebrates with long life cycle seem to be particularly vulnerable to unnatural water level fluctuation. Our results show that regulation of water level has a major impact on functionally significant lake littoral macroinvertebrates.     

Species–environment relationships of fish and map‐based variables in small boreal streams: Linkages with climate change and bioassessment

Species–environment relationships were studied between the occurrence of 13 fish and lamprey species and 9 mainly map‐based environmental variables of Finnish boreal small streams. A self‐organizing map (SOM) analysis showed strong relationships between the fish species and environmental variables in a single model (explained variance 55.9%). Besides basic environmental variables such as altitude, catchment size, and mean temperature, land cover variables were also explored. A logistic regression analysis indicated that the occurrence probability of brown trout, Salmo trutta L., decreased with an increasing percentage of peatland ditch drainage in the upper catchment. Ninespine stickleback, Pungitius pungitius (L.), and three‐spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus L., seemed to benefit from urban areas in the upper catchment. Discovered relationships between fish species occurrence and land‐use attributes are encouraging for the development of fish‐based bioassessment for small streams. The presented ordination of the fish species in the mean temperature gradient will help in predicting fish community responses to climate change.     

River bioassessment and the preservation of threatened species: Towards acceptable biological quality criteria

A central objective of environmental management is to maintain biodiversity, including populations of threatened species. Freshwater ecosystems are increasingly assessed by their biotic properties, but whether the resulting classifications of biotic condition are sufficient to protect species with conservation status has received very little consideration. We used data from 225 reference and impacted river sites from Finland to examine whether the occurrence and abundance of threatened macroinvertebrate species (TS) are associated with a commonly used estimate of biological condition (Observed-to-Expected number of predicted taxa of macroinvertebrates or O/E-ratio of taxonomic completeness, based on a predictive model). We suggest that a minimal acceptable condition below which restoration is needed, equivalent to, e.g. ‘good’ ecological status described by the European Union Water Framework Directive, should also ensure the occurrence of TS populations. We therefore followed conventional procedures for condition assessment, and examined two classifications by using the 10th or 25th percentiles of a reference O/E-distribution as alternative upper boundaries for the acceptable condition. The number and abundance of TS, and occurrence of individual TS showed positive relationships with the O/E. However, particularly if the 10th percentile threshold was used, there were only few occurrences and low abundance of TS in the suggested ‘good’ condition. The results imply that conventional criteria for satisfactory condition may not be sufficient for preservation of threatened river macroinvertebrates. However, our approach could bring an objective, meaningful, and societally acceptable means for setting site quality criteria in freshwater assessment.     

Habitat connectivity and dispersal ability drive the assembly mechanisms of macroinvertebrate communities in river networks

相似文献   

Same species,same habitat preferences? The distribution of aquatic plants is not explained by the same predictors in lakes and streams

1. Studying the geographical distribution of species can reveal conditions and processes that may drive species presence and abundance. Organism distribution has frequently been explained by climate, but the relative role of local environmental predictors is not fully understood. Moreover, in the freshwater realm, intrinsic differences existing between different categories of water bodies can lead to significant differences in species–environment relationships. Here, we tested the relative importance of broad-scale climate and local environmental predictors in explaining plant species distributions in freshwater lakes and streams.
2. We built species distribution models to investigate which predictors best explain aquatic plant distribution in two categories of water bodies. We used species inventories and records of three climate and eight local environmental predictors for 150 lakes and 150 streams in Finland.
3. We found that sets of predictors that explain the distribution of macrophyte species are unique depending on if species are in a lake or a stream. Overall, air temperature and ecosystem size were essential to predict aquatic plant species presence in both water body categories. Broad-scale climate predictors were always very important in explaining species distribution, while local environmental conditions such as water chemistry were of variable influence, depending on species and water body category.
4. These results are probably due to high spatial and temporal variability and range of water physico-chemical parameters, especially in streams. Nonetheless, despite a lower relative importance than climatic factors, local environmental predictors also strongly affected species distributions.
5. Our findings highlight that incorporating local environmental conditions to species distribution models in addition to climate predictors is necessary to improve predictions, particularly for distribution of stream flora. Considering the species-specific responses of aquatic plants to their environment, studying species individually with species distribution models represents a useful analysis.