不同时间和空间尺度上台湾水青冈群落谱系结构动态变化

群落谱系结构是了解群落聚群过程的一个基础研究内容。但是现有大部分研究内容集中在群落组成和结构的时空差异,对谱系结构的动态变化研究较少。以浙江省清凉峰国家级自然保护区的国家二级保护植物台湾水青冈(Fagus hayatae)林为研究对象,利用2006年、2011年、2016年3次群落动态调查数据,从10、20、50m的3个空间尺度上研究该群落在10a间的谱系结构动态变化,分析时空尺度对台湾水青冈群落谱系结构的影响,探究调控台湾水青冈群落动态变化的主要因子,为后期台湾水青冈林的保护提供理论基础。研究发现(1)在10a森林动态变化过程中,群落的MPD指数下降,MNTD指数增加。NRI和NTI指数在大尺度上随时间显著增加,但在小尺度上无显著变化。(2)随着空间尺度的增加,上述指数的动态变化趋势均不断增强。以上结果表明,2006—2016年间台湾水青冈群落总体谱系结构表现出不断聚集的趋势,而近缘种的谱系关系则不断疏远;群落谱系结构的聚集趋势随空间尺度的增加而增强。大尺度上的环境过滤和小尺度上的随机过程和种间竞争作用可能是导致该地区台湾水青冈群落谱系结构动态变化的主要生态学过程。     

基于历史生物多样性与湿地景观结构的三江平原湿地恢复优先性研究

三江平原是我国最大的淡水沼泽分布区,建国后大规模的农业开发活动导致湿地面积锐减,湿地生态系统服务功能退化,产生一系列的生态环境问题,有必要进行湿地恢复。生物多样性的历史分布和湿地景观结构特征对湿地恢复具有重要指导意义。在分析三江平原湿地景观格局变化的基础上,结合三江平原历史生物多样性保护价值(即湿地恢复价值)以及各县市内湿地景观结构(现有湿地分布比例)对湿地恢复进行了优先性分析,确定了不同县市内不同空间位置上湿地恢复优先等级。景观格局变化分析结果表明,三江平原在20年间,湿地面积大幅减少,且破碎化现象严重,70%以上的退化或消失湿地被耕地侵占;基于历史生物多样性保护价值的湿地恢复价值评估表明,目前已经退化或消失的湿地有57.56%具有相对较高的恢复价值,而且还有22.02%的区域处于中等恢复价值水平,恢复潜力较大;结合现有湿地分布比例的结果表明,在三江平原的19个受湿地影响的市县中,有2个一级恢复区,6个二级恢复区,9个三级恢复区和2个四级恢复区。研究为今后三江平原湿地恢复行动的时空顺序确定提供了参考,同时为缺少生物多样性历史监测数据的区域提供了快速的湿地恢复评估方法。     

刈割后黑麦草生理保护作用对其补偿性生长的影响

通过对黑麦草(Lolium perenne L)在轻度、中度、重度、全割刈割处理6 d和12 d后,残留叶片和叶片再生部分生长速率,超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)活力,丙二醛、可溶性糖、脯氨酸含量的分析以揭示在刈割胁迫后叶片抗氧护酶活力和渗透调节物含量与其补偿性生长的关系,以及牧草耐刈性的生理调控机理。结果表明,轻度和中度及全割后叶片生长速率均高于对照,重度刈割低于对照。全割后叶片补偿性生长最明显、轻度和中度次之,重度刈割无补偿性生长。对照黑麦草叶片各部位抗氧化酶和渗透调节物含量不同,叶片顶部MDA含量较高,伴随着较高的SOD、CAT活力和较高的脯氨酸含量;叶片基部MDA含量最低,SOD、CAT活力及脯氨酸含量也较低。与对照相比,不同强度刈割6 d黑麦草再生叶和叶片平均MDA含量、SOD和CAT活力、可溶性糖和脯氨酸含量均较低。而不同强度刈割12 d,黑麦草再生叶和叶片平均MDA含量仍较低,但SOD和CAT活力增高,脯氨酸含量增加,POD活力和可溶性糖含量低于对照。这表明刈割在减少了叶面积,降低光合能力的同时,刈割伤害胁迫启动了牧草补偿性生长使残留叶片快速生长,而且残留叶片面积与其补偿生长速率成正相关。另外,虽然不同强度刈割下叶片补偿性生长速率不同,但不同强度刈割(12 d)均激活残留叶片抗氧化保护酶系统和促进脯氨酸积累。在补偿生长过程中,CAT和SOD能及时清除残留叶片中积累的氧自由基,维持较低的膜脂过氧化和细胞膜完整性,积累的脯氨酸能维护细胞水分平衡。因此,抗氧化酶(SOD和CAT)和渗透调节物(脯氨酸)在黑麦草刈割后受伤部位快速自愈及残留叶片快速补偿生长中起重要生理保护作用。     

区域农田景观格局对麦蚜种群数量的影响

明确农田景观格局对麦田蚜虫种群的影响,是开展区域性害虫生态调控的重要理论依据之一。以区域性小麦种植区为研究对象,基于遥感影像与土地覆盖分类数据以及田间调查的蚜虫种群数据,计算景观格局指数,使用负二项分布的广义线性模型从农田景观、非作物生境景观和区域景观3个方面分析了区域农田景观格局对麦田蚜虫种群的影响。结果表明,蚜虫种群的数量与草地的平均斑块面积和最大斑块指数显著正相关,与县域的平均几何最邻近距离和面积加权平均斑块面积显著负相关,与耕地的面积加权平均斑块面积显著负相关,与耕地的斑块密度显著正相关。草地斑块面积的增大、区域景观与耕地的破碎化、区域景观的聚集会促进蚜虫种群数量的增加。使用草地的斑块面积和最大斑块指数、区域景观的平均几何最邻近距离可以预测蚜虫种群的发生量。非作物生境草地的斑块面积、耕地的破碎化、区域景观的空间分布及破碎化是影响麦田蚜虫种群发生的重要景观因素。     

广州市公园耐湿草本植物及其造景应用

选择广州市具有较长的自然式缓坡驳岸,且植物养护管理良好的6个公园为研究对象,调查其耐湿草本植物种类及其景观应用情况,分析广州公园耐湿草本植物造景的特点与存在的问题。研究表明,在调查区域内共记录有耐湿草本植物77种（含变种、变型和品种）,隶属26科52属,其中一年生草本26种,多年生草本50种,蕨类1种;常用的耐湿草本植物以低矮型和中型草本为主。广州公园的耐湿草本植物应用于水边造景有以下四个特点：①色彩调和,展现水乡风光;②线条变化,增添湿地趣味;③适地适草,体现热带特色;④自然种植,创造观景效果。广州公园建设宜考虑适当增加地带性的多年生耐湿草本植物种类。     

1996—2016年松嫩平原传统大豆种植结构的时空演变

在转基因大豆冲击下,我国传统大豆种植面积大幅下降,研究大豆主产区传统大豆种植结构及其动态变化对我国大豆进出口贸易和保障国家粮食安全意义重大.本研究基于1996—2016年Landsat TM/OLI遥感影像,以遥感、地理信息系统技术为支撑,利用随机森林方法提取大豆空间分布信息,并结合景观格局指数分析松嫩平原大豆种植结构时空演变特征.结果表明: 1996—2016年,松嫩平原大豆种植面积呈波动变化;在与其他地物类型面积转换中,大豆与其他作物面积间的转换最明显;大豆斑块面积占作物总面积的比例呈先增后减特征,而斑块密度指数和分离度指数均呈先减后增趋势.松嫩平原传统大豆种植结构时空演变表现出种植面积波动变化、破碎度增加、空间分布趋于离散的特征;国内外市场及政策导向成为传统大豆种植结构变化的重要影响因素.     

基于地形梯度特征的福州市景观格局演变

地形是土地景观格局变化的重要因素.为揭示不同地形梯度下景观格局的时空特征和变化规律,以1995、2005和2015年3期福州市遥感影像和数字高程模型(DEM)数据为基础,运用地形位指数、土地利用分布指数、地学信息图谱分析和景观指数等方法,探讨景观格局的地形梯度效应以及形成原因.结果表明: 研究期间,研究区林地主要位于中低、中高和高等级地形位,农地、水体、建设用地和未利用土地主要集中位于低等级地形位.1995—2015年,福州市林地、农地和未利用土地面积减少,建设用地和水体面积增加.景观类型变化以稳定型为主,主要分布于中低、中高及高等级地形梯度区域;景观格局在地形梯度上变化差异明显,低地形位区域景观类型主要转向建设用地,而在中低及中高地形位区域,主要发生农地与林地的交替转变.研究区景观格局破碎化、景观异质性和景观多样性等属性逐年上升,随着地形梯度升高而降低.     

Social perspectives on the use of reference conditions in restoration of fire‐adapted forest landscapes

As approaches to ecological restoration become increasingly large scale and collaborative, there is a need to better understand social aspects of restoration and how they influence land management. In this article, we examine social perspectives that influence the determination of ecological reference conditions in restoration. Our analysis is based on in‐depth interviews with diverse stakeholders involved in collaborative restoration of fire‐adapted forest landscapes. We conducted interviews with 86 respondents from six forest collaboratives that are part of the U.S. Forest Service's Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program. Collaboratives use a variety of approaches to develop reference conditions, including historic, contemporary, and future scenarios. Historical conditions prior to European settlement (nineteenth century or “pre‐settlement” conditions), or prior to more recent grazing, logging, and exclusion of fire, were the predominant type of reference used in all sites. Stakeholders described benefits and limitations of reference conditions. Primary benefits include (1) providing a science‐based framework for bringing stakeholders together around a common vision; (2) gaining social understanding and acceptance of the underlying need for restoration; and (3) serving to neutralize otherwise value‐laden discussions about multiple, sometimes competing, resource objectives. Limitations stem from (1) concerns over social conflict when reference conditions are perceived to contradict other stakeholder values and interests, (2) differing interpretations of reference condition science, (3) inappropriate application or over‐generalization of reference information, and (4) limited relevance of historical references for current and future conditions in some ecosystems. At the same time, collaboratives are adopting innovative strategies to address conceptual and methodological limitations of reference conditions.     

Incorporating biophysical ecology into high‐resolution restoration targets: insect pollinator habitat suitability models

Species distribution models can be informative of the biodiversity impacts of changing environments at global, national, and regional scales, but are often constrained in their resolution to extents not relevant to individual, intensive ecological management programs. We constructed a high‐resolution topoclimatic model of spring and summer temperatures across a 152 km² restoration area on the Swan Coastal Plain, Western Australia, and used it to project energetic expenditure and habitat suitability estimates for four major hymenopteran pollinators. For all species, the most heavily modified landscapes were the least suitable, but only for one species, Zapsilothynnus nigripes, was there evidence that the upper thermal tolerance threshold was exceeded broadly. However, at the higher environmental temperatures that we modeled, some species would need to forage up to 10 times their own body mass every hour to meet their energetic requirements. It seems unlikely that the nutritional requirements of most insect pollinators operating at these higher metabolic rates could be met in an impoverished restoration ecosystem, although resource availability remains to be quantified in these habitats. Hence, to increase the likelihood of restoration success by restoring insect pollination networks, nutritional resources may need to be increased during restoration. Accounting for the way that thermoenergetic requirements shape ecological interactions better positions management trajectories aimed at restoring and maintaining key insect pollinators in “novel” ecosystems.     

Making the connection: expanding the role of restoration genetics in restoring and evaluating connectivity

The success of restoration activities is affected by connectivity with the surrounding landscape. From a genetic perspective, landscape connectivity can influence gene flow, effective size, and genetic diversity of populations, which in turn have impacts on the fitness and adaptive potential of species in restored areas. Researchers and practitioners are increasingly using genetic data to incorporate elements of connectivity into restoration planning and evaluation. We show that genetic studies of connectivity can improve restoration planning in three main ways. First, by comparing genetic estimates of contemporary and historical gene flow and population size, practitioners can establish historical baselines that may provide targets for restoration of connectivity. Second, empirical estimates of dispersal, landscape resistance to movement, and adaptive genetic variance can be derived from genetic data and used to parameterize existing restoration planning tools. Finally, restoration actions can also be targeted to remove barriers to gene flow or mitigate pinch‐points in corridors. We also discuss appropriate methods for evaluating the restoration of gene flow over timescales required by practitioners. Collaboration between restoration geneticists, ecologists, and practitioners is needed to develop practical and innovative ways to further incorporate connectivity into restoration practice.