Lines in the mud; revisiting the boundaries of important shorebird areas

Many shorebird populations are declining throughout the world, concurrent with declines and degradation of wetland habitats. Such declines necessitate a more consistent approach towards conserving habitats used by shorebird populations. Individuals of many shorebird species congregate in specific areas during their non-breeding season. Worldwide, non-breeding areas are designated as ‘important’ for shorebird conservation based primarily on the abundance of birds found in an area. However, the boundaries of any area are often defined with incomplete information regarding how shorebirds use that habitat. This paper discusses examples in Australia where improved knowledge of shorebird habitat use led to the identification of very different boundaries of important shorebird areas than those identified originally. We highlight how simple questioning of those who count shorebirds in an area, led to an improved understanding of which areas were apparently used by the same local population of non-breeding shorebirds. Subsequent analysis of available count, recapture and/or home range data of particular shorebird species is needed to verify expert opinion regarding most of these boundaries. We review how enhanced boundaries improve the ability of shorebird monitoring to detect population changes; allow management of shorebird habitats at relevant spatial scales; and lead to appropriate designations of important areas. While the kinds of approaches to boundary setting described here are not new, they are not consistently applied worldwide. We suggest additional guidelines to those produced under the Ramsar Convention in regard to designating important areas. We also call for more studies on the movements of migratory shorebirds during the non-breeding season to direct more consistent boundary setting around important non-breeding habitats used by local populations of migratory shorebirds.     

Ecological engineering: First steps towards economic analysis

Ecosystems fulfill a large number of ecological and economic functions. Increasing economic activity and population pressure are threatening the quality of ecosystems, and strengthen the need for ecological engineering. In this article some of the economic aspects of ecological engineering are discussed. In particular, the various methods to establish the economic costs and benefits of ecological engineering. For benefit estimation various methods are developed, including the contingent valuation method, the hedonic pricing method, the travel cost method and the shadow project method. The economic background, and the applicability and appropriateness of these methods are discussed. Next, the results of several studies on wetland valuation are shortly presented. It is concluded that the full socio-economic assessment of ecological engineering is still to be developed, and that further cooperation between ecologists and economists is required to make progress in this field that is rapidly gaining importance in policy making, both at the European and the global level.     

Vegetation zonation along the desert-wetland ecosystem of Taif Highland,Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia has no permanent lakes or rivers but has wet meadows, which are desert wetlands temporarily formed due to the seasonal rainfall. This work investigates the environmental variables' impact on the vegetation pattern in the desert-wetland ecosystem in Taif highlands. Forty-one stands were randomly selected representing three main habitats (wet meadows, slopes, and terraces) to study their floristic features and vegetation analysis. A total of 142 species were recorded belonging to 111 genera and 45 families in the desert wetlands of Taif Province. About 64.1% were natural plants, while 25.4% were segetal weeds, 7.7% were aquatic plants, and 2.8% were plants that escaped from cultivation. Therophytes dominated over the other life forms, and mono-regional taxa were the dominant chorotype. Multivariate analysis of the recorded plants produced eight vegetation groups; four of them (A: Potamogeton nodosus-Nasturtium officinale, B: Lemna gibba-Leptochloa fusca, C: Typha domingensis- Xanthium strumarium and D: Conyza stricta- Cyperus longus) represented the wet meadows, while two (E: Acacia gerrardii- Commicarpus plumbagineus and H: Osteospermum vaillantii- Eragrostis Pilosa) for slopes and other two (F: Argemone ochroleuca-Cyperus rotundus and G: Pulicaria undulata- Solanum incanum) for the desert terraces. The vegetation zonation was clear, which started from real aquatic species in the wet meadows passing through mixed vegetation in the slopes and ended with proper xerophytic vegetation in the terraces. Conyza stricta- Cyperus longus community had the highest species diversity, while that of Potamogeton nodosus-Nasturtium officinale had the lowest. The principal component analysis indicated that HCO₃, NO₃, Mg, Cl, Ca, and pH values were the most effective soil variable. The presence of several segetal weeds suggests the alteration of the natural status of the desert-wetland ecosystem, and thus the conservation of these natural habitats becomes urgent.     

Germination ecology of three endangered river corridor plants in relation to their preferred occurrence

As a contribution to conservation, we investigated germination requirements of three perennial, endangered river corridor plants of Central European lowlands coexisting in subcontinental flood meadows, but preferring particular zones of decreasing flooding frequency and duration along the elevational gradient of the banks. It was hypothesized that the species have specific germination requirements to respond successfully to open patch creation depending on their occurrence along the gradient of spring flooding in the field. This study involved controlled experiments and phenological studies.     

Rare and infrequent southern African grasses: assessing their conservation status and understanding their biology

The taxonomic treatment for the grasses of southern Africa was one of the first to be based on computerised data and the DELTA system. These data, based on over 70,000 herbarium records, are amenable for analysis of species parameters including abundance, frequency and distribution. This information is suitable for the allocation of species into the seven categories of rarity proposed by Rabinowitz using a combination of habitat specificity (“Narrow” or “Broad”), population structure (“Sparse” or “Abundant”) and distribution (“Restricted” or “Widespread”). We compare the species lists obtained for each combination of these three aspects to published Red Data Lists (RDLs) for southern and South Africa. Ninety-three species are placed in the most sensitive or potentially threatened category (Narrow habitat, Sparse populations and Restricted distributions; RSN). This is substantially more than the number of species listed in current RDLs for the region. Chi-square tests indicate a statistically significant bias in taxa from the Fynbos Biome for three of the categories (RSN, RAN and WSN), from the Savanna Biome for the WAN category and from the arid Succulent Karoo and Desert Biomes for the RAB category. Analyses of habitat requirements indicate that many grasses listed (especially those associated with a “Narrow” habitat) are found in some form of wetlands (ephemeral or permanent), especially those at higher altitudes (montane). Despite concerns about the subjective nature in determining the boundaries between the categories, this method is shown to provide a meaningful and valuable list of taxa that require prioritisation for more detailed assessment according to the IUCN criteria.