Subsocial behaviour in Oniticellus cinctus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae): effect of the brood on parental care and oviposition

ABSTRACT. In Oniticellus cinctus (F.) the nest chambers each contain about twenty brood balls. Females enlarge the brood balls during the egg and larval stages and remain in the chamber for the whole period of brood development (1 month); they then make a new nest after 1 week. The presence of the brood releases parental care and ensures that the mother remains in the nest: she repairs defects in the brood balls and the nest, and expels other O. cinctus females. A new ball is formed around a naked O. cinctus larva, but larvae of other species are killed. In addition, the brood inhibits oviposition: removal (or addition) of brood balls stimulates (or inhibits) egg laying. In inhibited ovarioles, existing follicles are resorbed and production of new ones ceases. Control of clutch size by the brood is an adaptation to the nest structure and life history of O. cinctus. It may have an important role in the reproductive strategy of other insects with parental care.     

A functional classification for analysis of the structure of dung beetle assemblages

Abstract. 1. Regional scarabaeid dung beetle assemblages in southern Africa may contain over 100 species, ranging in live weight from 10 mg to 10 g. These show a wide variety of dung-use and reproductive strategies.
2. To facilitate analysis of these diverse assemblages, a system of classification analogous to guilds is proposed. Scarabaeid dung beetle species are allocated to one of seven functional groups (FGs) according to the way they use and disrupt dung. Each group therefore contains a set of species which are functional analogues of each other. This classification provides a conceptual framework within which to analyse the structure of dung beetle assemblages and the interactions between dung beetles and other dung-breeding species such as coprophagous flies.
3. There is a clear hierarchy of functional groups in their ability to compete for dung. Competitively dominant groups such as the large ball rollers (FG I) and fast-burying tunnellers (FG III) are mostly large, aggressive beetles which rapidly remove dung from the pad. The smaller ball rollers (FG II) are also effective competitors for dung. Subordinate groups are those which bury dung slowly over many days (FG IV and V) and those which breed inside the pad (FG VII, endocoprids). Kleptocoprids (FG VI) breed in dung buried by other beetles and so are not part of the hierarchy.
4. The use of this classification is illustrated by reference to three contrasting assemblages of dung beetles in a summer rainfall region of southern Africa. The potential of these beetles for biological control of dung-breeding flies is discussed.     

Appendix

Abstract

The influence of pasture plant species oli the aggregation and oviposition behaviour of black beetle adults was examined. Adults tended to aggregate under grass species rather than white clover or bare ground. A preference for grasses, and in particular for Paspolum dilatatum, as oviposition sites was noted. The significance of this to larval development and population sampling is discussed.     

Global distribution patterns provide evidence of niche shift by the introduced African dung beetle Digitonthophagus gazella

The establishment of cattle ranches throughout the world has prompted the release of dung beetles as biological control agents that reduce pasture fouling and control dung-breeding flies. One of these beetles, Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), that is native to southeast Africa, has been introduced into the Americas, Australia, and New Zealand. Distribution records for this species have been used to develop climate models of potential future establishment. Recent studies, however, identify D. gazella as a complex of seven species. Taking into account this revision, and the clear identification of the records belonging to the actual D. gazella, we developed environmental models to identify factors that have contributed to the establishment of this species across regions and habitats. We compared the environmental conditions of D. gazella in its native range against those in the regions where the species has or has not established. Our results indicate that D. gazella is still absent in certain parts of Central and South America and parts of Africa where it could potentially establish. We speculate that its distribution in Africa is limited by competitive exclusion. The introduction of D. gazella in America is relatively recent, such that the full extent of its distribution has probably yet to be realized. In Australia and North America, D. gazella is present in regions not predicted according to its native environmental conditions. This discrepancy may reflect a lack of competitive exclusion, phenotypic plasticity, and/or genetic adaptation. Our analyses suggest that the species has the ability to adapt to a wide range of environmental conditions that are extremely different from those in their native region. The species represents a useful case study to indicate that an introduced species may expand its realized niche beyond what is expected based on apparent environmental limits in the species native range.