经皮椎板间内镜与椎板小开窗术治疗腰椎间盘突出症临床疗效比较

目的：分析和比较椎板间内镜与椎板小开窗术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效和安全性指标。方法：使用回顾性分析的方法 对2012-2014 年共计126 例在我科行椎板间内镜手术或椎板小开窗手术的腰椎间盘突出患者进行分析和比较。通过纳入和排除 标准的筛选,经皮椎板间内镜组纳入48例,椎板小开窗组纳入78 例。结合详实的术后随访,对两组患者在花费,住院时间等一般 性指标,疼痛指标,功能指标,并发症等数据进行分析和比较。结果：两组患者在术后均取得明显的治疗疗效,在疼痛、功能等指标 中都有明显的改善。但两组之间并无明显统计学差异(P>0.05)。而椎板间内镜组在住院时间,出血量,切口长度及并发症等方面明 显的优于小开窗组,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论：经皮椎板间内镜手术作为一种脊柱微创手术,治疗效果确切,安全性好,能体 现微创的优势,可作为椎间孔镜技术在治疗椎间盘突出症的有益补充,在临床中进一步的开展和推广。     

有限元分析法在腰椎生物力学研究中的应用及新进展

有限元分析法是指对复杂形态物体的应力及应变进行分析,具有力学性能测试全面、客观、可重复性的特点。目前,有限元分析法已被广泛应用于脊柱畸形、腰椎损伤以及假体植入等人体复杂结构生物力学的研究中。本文主要介绍有限元分析法在腰椎的椎体、间盘、韧带及肌肉组织中的应用,结合其概念、原理、建模方法等,总结该方法在新型内固定物力学特性研究中的优势,探讨其对不同植骨内固定术式选择的临床意义。     

术前量化训练方法对腰椎间盘突出患者术后锻炼依从性及康复效果的影响

目的：探讨术前量化训练方法对腰椎间盘突出患者术后锻炼依从性及康复效果的影响。方法：将84 例腰椎间盘突出患者随 机分为观察组及对照组各42 例,对照组围手术期间实施常规性护理,观察组围手术期间实施术前量化训练,对比分析两组患者 负性情绪、术后锻炼依从性及康复情况。结果：观察组干预后汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）评分、汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD）评分 低于对照组（P<0.05）。观察组术后锻炼依从率、满意率高于对照组（P<0.05）,而并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后疼 痛评分低于对照组（P<0.05）,观察组术后下床活动时间及平均住院时间短于对照组（P<0.05）。结论：对腰椎间盘突出患者术前进 行适应手术训练可有效改善患者负性情绪,提高患者术后锻炼依从性,有利于患者术后康复,提高患者康复效果。     

中医药外治法在腰椎管狭窄症中的应用

腰椎管狭窄症是由于腰椎的骨与软组织因某种原因而发生形态与组织结构方面的变化,造成椎管容积变小,导致脊神经根受到机械性压迫而出现特有的临床症状的一种疾病。本文拟通过对近年来腰椎管狭窄症的研究文献的分析、总结,从针刺、推拿、注射、牵引等对腰椎管狭窄症的中医药外治现状进行总结,旨在指导临床治疗。     

腰椎后路手术肠道菌群变化的研究

目的探讨腰椎后路手术患者肠道菌群的变化以期更合理的指导临床治疗。方法选择58例腰椎后路手术患者,出现肠道菌群失调症者38例,未出现肠道菌群失调症的20例作为对照组。在腰椎后路手术后,分别取2组患者自然排出的新鲜粪便10 g,采用定性定量检测比较2组患者肠道主要菌群差异及B/E值。肠道菌群失调症患者且与手术前自然排出的新鲜粪便进行相同比较。结果试验组肠道的双歧杆菌、类杆菌数量及B/E值较对照组均减少,分别是:9.21±0.65 vs 10.12±0.85;10.02±0.45 vs 10.23±0.45;1.05±0.17 vs 6.99±1.24,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);而肠杆菌、肠球菌数量较对照组增加,分别是:9.11±1.09 vs 8.55±0.89;7.80±1.02vs 7.29±0.98,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。小梭菌、乳杆菌与对照组相比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。肠道菌群失调症患者与手术前进行比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腰椎后路手术出现肠道菌群失调患者专性厌氧菌减少,条件致病菌增加,肠道微生物定植抗力下降。正确及时地去除病因,尽可能地采取微创手术技术,减少医源性损伤,调整机体免疫功能,纠正营养不良,合理使用抗生素是解决腰椎后路手术患者肠道功能障碍的有效办法。     

腰椎间盘突出症260例临床分析

目的:总结腰椎间盘突出症的临床特点及诊治要点。方法:回顾性分析260例腰椎间盘突出症手术患者的临床资料。结果:直腿抬高与影像学检查结果符合率为100%,治疗优良率达88.08%,有效率100%。结论:腰、下肢和臀部疼痛、下肢麻木、体位改变、运动障碍、感觉障碍、肌萎缩都是腰椎间盘突出症的主要临床表现;直腿抬高试验高试验可作为早期诊断的重要参考指标,要要根据惠者体征、病程等具体情况选择适合的最佳治法。     

Functional implications of variation in lumbar vertebral count among hominins

As early as the 1970s, Robinson defined lumbar vertebrae according to their zygapophyseal orientation. He identified six lumbar elements in fossil Sts 14 Australopithecus africanus, one more than is commonly present in modern humans. It is now generally inferred that the modal number of lumbar vertebrae for australopiths and early Homo was six, from which the mode of five in later Homo is derived. The two central questions this study investigates are (1) to what extent do differences in human lumbar vertebral count affect lordotic shape and lumbar function, and (2) what does lumbar number variation imply about lumbar spine function in early hominins? To address these questions, I first outline a biomechanical model of lumbar number effect on lordotic function. I then identify relevant morphological differences in the human modal and extra-modal variants, which I use to test the model. These tests permit evaluation of the human L6 variant as a model for reconstructing early hominin modal number and spine function. Application of the biomechanical model in reconstructing australopith/early Homo lumbar spines highlights shared principles of Euler column strength and sagittal spine flexibility among early and modern hominins. Within modern humans, the extra-modal L6 variant has an extended series of three cranially positioned kyphotic vertebrae and strongly oblique zygapophyseal facets at the last lumbar level. Although they share the same radius and length of lumbar curvature, the L6 variant differs functionally from the L5 mode in its expanded range of sagittal flexion/extension and enhanced resistance to shear. Given the modal number of six lumbar vertebrae in australopiths and early Homo, lumbar spine mobility and strength would have been key properties of vertebral function in early bipeds whose upper and lower body segments were coupled by close approximation of the thorax and iliac crests.     

不同手术方式对腰椎间盘突出症治疗的效果比较分析

目的:探讨应用微创技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效.方法:对我院脊柱骨科自2005年l1月～2010年10月收治的128例腰椎间盘突出症患者应用不同手术方式进行治疗,其中应用APLD( automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy)治疗单纯腰椎间盘突出症48例;应用MED(microendoscopic discectomy)治疗复杂型腰椎间盘突出症42例;应用传统后路椎板开窗技术治疗单纯腰椎间盘突出症38例;比较各组手术时间、术中出血、术后住院时间、疗效及并发症.术后均随访8个月～3年,观察复发情况.结果:三组不同手术方式手术时间及优良率比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),APLD及MED组术中出血量及术后住院时间与传统手术组比较,差异有显著性(P＜0.05);术后随访疼痛全部缓解,无复发.结论:在严格掌握适应症的基础上,采用微创技术和采用传统手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效相当,但微创技术创伤小、术中出血量少,术后住院日短,恢复快,优于传统手术.     

Differences in 3D vs. 2D analysis in lumbar spinal fusion simulations

Lumbar interbody fusion is currently the gold standard in treating patients with disc degeneration or segmental instability. Despite it having been used for several decades, the non-union rate remains high. A failed fusion is frequently attributed to an inadequate mechanical environment after instrumentation. Finite element (FE) models can provide insights into the mechanics of the fusion process. Previous fusion simulations using FE models showed that the geometries and material of the cage can greatly influence the fusion outcome. However, these studies used axisymmetric models which lacked realistic spinal geometries. Therefore, different modeling approaches were evaluated to understand the bone-formation process.Three FE models of the lumbar motion segment (L4–L5) were developed: 2D, Sym-3D and Nonsym-3D. The fusion process based on existing mechano-regulation algorithms using the FE simulations to evaluate the mechanical environment was then integrated into these models. In addition, the influence of different lordotic angles (5, 10 and 15°) was investigated. The volume of newly formed bone, the axial stiffness of the whole segment and bone distribution inside and surrounding the cage were evaluated.In contrast to the Nonsym-3D, the 2D and Sym-3D models predicted excessive bone formation prior to bridging (peak values with 36 and 9% higher than in equilibrium, respectively). The 3D models predicted a more uniform bone distribution compared to the 2D model.The current results demonstrate the crucial role of the realistic 3D geometry of the lumbar motion segment in predicting bone formation after lumbar spinal fusion.     

A combined passive and active musculoskeletal model study to estimate L4-L5 load sharing

A number of geometrically-detailed passive finite element (FE) models of the lumbar spine have been developed and validated under in vitro loading conditions. These models are devoid of muscles and thus cannot be directly used to simulate in vivo loading conditions acting on the lumbar joint structures or spinal implants. Gravity loads and muscle forces estimated by a trunk musculoskeletal (MS) model under twelve static activities were applied to a passive FE model of the L4-L5 segment to estimate load sharing among the joint structures (disc, ligaments, and facets) under simulated in vivo loading conditions. An equivalent follower (FL), that generates IDP equal to that generated by muscle forces, was computed in each task. Results indicated that under in vivo loading conditions, the passive FE model predicted intradiscal pressures (IDPs) that closely matched those measured under the simulated tasks (R² = 0.98 and root-mean-squared-error, RMSE = 0.18 MPa). The calculated equivalent FL compared well with the resultant force of all muscle forces and gravity loads acting on the L4-L5 segment (R² = 0.99 and RMSE = 58 N). Therefore, as an alternative approach to represent in vivo loading conditions in passive FE model studies, this FL can be estimated by available in-house or commercial MS models. In clinical applications and design of implants, commonly considered in vitro loading conditions on the passive FE models do not adequately represent the in vivo loading conditions under muscle exertions. Therefore, more realistic in vivo loading conditions should instead be used.