Evaluating the 'Labeled Magnitude Scale' for Measuring Sensations of Taste and Smell

The Labeled Magnitude Scale (LMS) is a semantic scale of perceptualintensity characterized by a quasi-logarithmic spacing of itsverbal labels. The LMS had previously been shown to yield psychophysicalfunctions equivalent to magnitude estimation (ME) when gustatory,thermal and nociceptive stimuli were presented and rated together,and the upper bound of the LMS was defined as the ‘strongestimaginable oral sensation’. The present study comparedthe LMS to ME within the more limited contexts of taste andsmell. In Experiment 1, subjects used both methods to rate eithertaste intensity produced by sucrose and NaCl or odor intensityproduced by acetic acid and phenyl ethyl alcohol, with the upperbound of the LMS defined as either the ‘strongest imaginabletaste’ or the ‘strongest imaginable odor’.The LMS produced psychophysical functions equivalent to thoseproduced by ME. In Experiment 2 a new group of subjects usedboth methods to rate the intensity of three different tastequalities, with the upper bound of the LMS defined as the ‘strongestimaginable [sweetness, saltiness, or bitterness]’. Inall three cases the LMS produced steeper functions than didME. Experiment 3 tested the hypothesis that the LMS yields datacomparable to ME only when the perceptual domain under studyincludes painful sensations. This hypothesis was supported whenthe LMS again produced steeper functions than ME after subjectshad been explicitly instructed to omit painful sensations (e.g.the ‘burn’ of hot peppers) from the concept of ‘strongestimaginable taste’. We conclude that the LMS can be usedto scale sensations of taste and smell when they are broadlydefined, but that it should be modified for use in scaling specifictaste (and probably odor) qualities. The implications of theseresults for theoretical issues related to ME, category-ratioscales and the size of the perceptual range in different sensorymodalities are discussed. Chem. Senses 21: 323–334, 1996.     

The ecological role of caudal lamellae loss in the larval damselfly,Ischnura posita (Hagen) (Odonata: Zygoptera)

Summary Damselfly larvae may autotomize and regenerate any of their 3 caudal lamellae. At least one missing or regenerating lamella was evident in 50.1% of field collected Ischnura posita larvae. Lamellae loss during molting is very infrequent (1 out of 117 recorded molts). Laboratory trials indicate that conspecifics remove lamellae and that this process is density dependent. The percentage of larvae losing lamellae during 24 h trials ranged from 73.5 at the highest density tested to 17.3 at the lowest density. I. posita larvae are cannibalistic. The presence of lamellae reduces an individual's chance of being cannibalized. More than twice as many final instar lamellae-less larvae were cannibalized during 24 h trials than analogous individuals having 3 lamellae at experimental initiation. Costs are also associated with lamellae autotomy. 1) Although individuals without lamellae can swim they are more reluctant to release from a wooden stalk and swim when threatened (9% release) than are larvae with lamellae (29% release). Since swimming is part of their repertoire of anti-predator behaviors this behavioral shift should be detrimental. 2) Caudal lamellae function in O₂ uptake. Trials were conducted with larvae having and not having lamellae in an experimental horizontal oxygen gradient system. Relative to larvae without lamellae, those with lamellae preferred deeper depths at PO₂ values greater than 70 torr. Many lamellae-less larvae distributed themselves at the water surface throughout the range of PO₂ values tested. Differential depth distribution between larvae with and without lamellae is highly significant (P < 0.01).