Substitutions of hydrophobic amino acids reduce the amyloidogenicity of Alzheimer's disease beta A4 peptides.

The deposition of amyloid protein aggregates in brain is the main pathological feature of Alzheimer's disease. Their principal constituent is a peptide termed beta A4, which comprises up to 43 amino acid residues. It is highly insoluble under physiological conditions and aggregates into filaments that form very dense clusters in vivo and in vitro. Based on a beta A4 prototype sequence spanning residues 10 to 42 or 43, we have designed analogues in which hydrophobic amino acid residues in position 17 to 20 were substituted by more hydrophilic residues. Depending on the kind of newly introduced amino acids and their position within the sequence, the substitution of only two residues led to variants exhibiting a broad spectrum of different properties. Common to them was a reduced beta-sheet content after solubilization in water and in the solid state. Some of the variants showed significantly reduced amyloidogenicity: although still forming filaments, they did not aggregate into the highly condensed depositions that are typical for amyloid. In addition, they could be solubilized in 200 mM-NaCl and KCl. When mixed with beta A4 peptides bearing the natural sequence, two of the analogues could inhibit the formation of filaments in vitro. These results demonstrate that a well-preserved hydrophobic core around residues 17 to 20 of beta A4 is crucial for the formation of beta-sheet structure and the amyloid properties of beta A4. The introduction of structural alterations within this region may guide the development of reagents for the therapy of Alzheimer's disease.     

Pulling or drilling, does size or species matter? An experimental study of prey handling in Octopus dierythraeus ()

The influence of both predator and prey size on the shift from a pulling to a drilling predatory response was examined in the intertidal octopus Octopus dierythraeus, using an experimental program. Additionally, selective drilling, where particular regions of the prey are targeted, was examined for a variety of bivalve and gastropod prey. O. dierythraeus always initially attempted to pull bivalves apart. Shells that were eventually drilled were always subjected to significantly more pulling attempts than those that could be pulled apart, indicating that octopus are willing to expend more energy to access the flesh quickly. There was no defined threshold where bivalve size caused an octopus to switch from a pulling to a drilling response. Instead, there was a broad size range where the octopus could adopt either handling method and it varied for each individual. Octopus may only able to pull open bivalves before the molecular ratchet or ‘catch’ mechanism that many bivalves possess is engaged. This might explain the lack of a relationship between either octopus or bivalve size and the success of pulling, as it is likely that when the bivalves were presented to individual octopus they were either setting the ‘catch’ mechanism, or had already engaged it. O. dierythraeus demonstrated selective drilling on a variety of molluscan prey, with penetration sites differing between prey species. O. dierythraeus targeted the valve periphery, which was the thinnest part of the shell, therefore minimizing handling time. O. dierythraeus always drilled gastropods, but did not target the thinnest regions of the shells, with drill site varying according to the morphology of the prey. Elongate species with pronounced aperture lips were drilled in the apical region, close to the columella on the side of the opercula whereas nonelongate species were drilled immediately above the aperture. The location of drilling sites may represent a trade-off between targeting the most effective places to inject paralyzing secretions and the mechanically simplest places to drill.