Melanin coloration in New World orioles I: carotenoid masking and pigment dichromatism in the orchard oriole complex

Carotenoids produce the brilliant red, orange, and yellow colors of many animals. However, melanin pigments can also confer some of these same hues. Because carotenoid and melanin colors are produced in different ways and may serve different signaling functions, either within or between species, it is important to establish whether one or both types of pigment are responsible for coloration. We have discovered what appears to be an evolutionary switch from carotenoid- to melanin-based color in two sexually dichromatic New World orioles. Using a combination of reflectance spectrometry and chromatographic analyses of plumage pigments, we found that the chestnut plumage of adult male orchard orioles Icterus spurius is produced predominantly by phaeomelanins. Orchard oriole feathers also contain carotenoids, which appear to be masked by the high concentration of phaeomelanins. In contrast, both carotenoids and phaeomelanins appear to contribute to color in adult male Fuertes's orioles I. fuertesi . Moreover, yellow yearling male and female plumage in both species is produced by carotenoids alone. The masking of carotenoids with phaeomelanins in orchard orioles is interesting in light of the signaling roles that carotenoids are thought to play. In addition, these plumage differences produce a unique case of age and sexual pigment dimorphism in orchard and Fuertes's orioles.     

Anterograde Spread of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Requires Glycoprotein E and Glycoprotein I but Not Us9

Anterograde neuronal spread (i.e., spread from the neuron cell body toward the axon terminus) is a critical component of the alphaherpesvirus life cycle. Three viral proteins, gE, gI, and Us9, have been implicated in alphaherpesvirus anterograde spread in several animal models and neuron culture systems. We sought to better define the roles of gE, gI, and Us9 in herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) anterograde spread using a compartmentalized primary neuron culture system. We found that no anterograde spread occurred in the absence of gE or gI, indicating that these proteins are essential for HSV-1 anterograde spread. However, we did detect anterograde spread in the absence of Us9 using two independent Us9-deleted viruses. We confirmed the Us9 finding in different murine models of neuronal spread. We examined viral transport into the optic nerve and spread to the brain after retinal infection; the production of zosteriform disease after flank inoculation; and viral spread to the spinal cord after flank inoculation. In all models, anterograde spread occurred in the absence of Us9, although in some cases at reduced levels. This finding contrasts with gE- and gI-deleted viruses, which displayed no anterograde spread in any animal model. Thus, gE and gI are essential for HSV-1 anterograde spread, while Us9 is dispensable.Alphaherpesviruses are parasites of the peripheral nervous system. In their natural hosts, alphaherpesviruses establish lifelong persistent infections in sensory ganglia and periodically return by axonal transport to the periphery, where they cause recurrent disease. This life cycle requires viral transport along axons in two directions. Axonal transport in the retrograde direction (toward the neuron cell body) occurs during neuroinvasion and is required for the establishment of latency, while transport in the anterograde direction (away from the neuron cell body) occurs after reactivation and is required for viral spread to the periphery to cause recurrent disease. In addition to anterograde and retrograde axonal transport within neurons, alphaherpesviruses spread between synaptically connected neurons and between neurons and epithelial cells at the periphery (19, 22).The alphaherpesvirus subfamily includes the human pathogens herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, and varicella-zoster virus (VZV), as well as numerous veterinary pathogens such as pseudorabies virus (PRV) and bovine herpesviruses 1 and 5 (BHV-1 and BHV-5). The molecular mechanisms that mediate alphaherpesvirus anterograde axonal transport, anterograde spread, and cell-to-cell spread remain unclear. However, many studies of several alphaherpesviruses have indicated that anterograde transport or anterograde spread involves the viral proteins glycoprotein E (gE), glycoprotein I (gI), and Us9 (2, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 16, 26, 30, 31, 41, 46, 51, 52).Glycoproteins E and I are type I membrane proteins that form a heterodimer in the virion membrane and on the surface of infected cells. Although dispensable for the entry of extracellular virus, gE and gI mediate the epithelial cell-to-cell spread of numerous alphaherpesviruses (1, 3, 15, 20, 34, 38, 49, 53, 54). Us9 is a type II nonglycosylated membrane protein with no described biological activity apart from its role in neuronal transport (4, 18, 32). Here, we used several model systems to better characterize the roles of gE, gI, and Us9 in HSV-1 neuronal spread.Animal models to assess alphaherpesvirus neuronal transport (viral movement within a neuron) and spread (viral movement between cells) include the mouse flank and mouse retina models of infection. In the mouse flank model (Fig. ​(Fig.1A),1A), virus is scratch inoculated onto the depilated flank, where it infects the skin and spreads to innervating sensory neurons. The virus travels to the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in the spinal cord (retrograde direction) and then returns to an entire dermatome of skin (anterograde spread). The virus also is transported in an anterograde direction from the DRG to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and subsequently spreads to synaptically connected neurons. The production of zosteriform lesions and the presence of viral antigens in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord both are indicators of anterograde spread in this system. PRV gE and Us9 are required for the production of zosteriform disease, while gI is dispensable (7). In the absence of gE, HSV-1 also fails to cause zosteriform disease. However, unlike PRV, HSV-1 gE is required for retrograde spread to the DRG, so the role of gE in HSV-1 anterograde spread could not be evaluated in the mouse flank model (8, 36, 42).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Model systems to study HSV-1 neuronal spread. (A) Mouse flank model. Virus was scratch inoculated onto the skin, where it replicates, spreads to innervating neurons, and travels in a retrograde direction to the neuron cell body in the DRG. After replicating in the DRG, the virus travels in an anterograde direction back to the skin and into the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. Motor neurons also innervate the skin, allowing virus to reach the ventral horn of the spinal cord by retrograde transport. (B) Mouse retina model. Virus is injected into the vitreous body, from which it infects the retina as well as other structures of the eye, including the ciliary body, iris, and skeletal muscles of the orbit. From the retina, the virus is transported into the optic nerve and optic tract (OT) (anterograde direction) and then to the brain along visual pathways. Anterograde spread is detected in the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and superior colliculus (SC). From the infected ciliary body, iris, and skeletal muscle, the virus spreads in a retrograde direction along motor and parasympathetic neurons and is detected in the oculomotor and Edinger-Westphal nuclei (OMN/EWN). Only first-order sites of spread to the brain are indicated. (Brain images were modified and reproduced from reference 47 with permission from of the publisher. Copyright Elsevier 1992.) (C) Campenot chamber system. Campenot chambers consist of a Teflon ring that divides the culture into three separate compartments. Neurons are seeded into the S chamber and extend their axons into the M and N chambers. Vero cells are seeded into the N chamber 1 day before infection. Virus is added to the S chamber and detected in the N chamber, a measure of anterograde spread.The mouse retina infection model (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) has the advantage of allowing anterograde and retrograde spread to be studied independently of one another. Virus is delivered to the vitreous body, from which it infects the retina and other structures of the eye. The cell bodies of retinal neurons form the innermost layer of the retina; therefore, the virus infects these neurons directly, and spread from the retina along visual pathways to the brain occurs in an exclusively anterograde direction. In addition, the virus infects the anterior uveal layer of the eye (ciliary body and iris) and skeletal muscles in the orbit. From these tissues, the virus infects innervating parasympathetic and motor neurons and spreads to the brain in a retrograde direction. The localization of viral antigens in specific brain sites indicates whether the virus traveled to the brain along an anterograde or retrograde pathway (21, 25, 26, 39, 44, 51). PRV gE, gI, and Us9 each are essential for anterograde spread to the brain yet are dispensable for retrograde spread (5, 11, 25, 52). Even a strain of PRV lacking all three of these proteins retains retrograde neuronal spread activity (12, 40, 44). In contrast, in the absence of gE, HSV-1 fails to spread to the brain by either the anterograde or retrograde pathway (51).The Campenot chamber system (Fig. ​(Fig.1C)1C) has the advantage of allowing quantitative measurement of anterograde spread. Sympathetic neurons are cultured in a tripartite ring in which neuron cell bodies are contained in a separate compartment from their neurites. Virus is added to neuron cell bodies in one chamber, and anterograde spread to a separate chamber is measured by viral titers (13, 29, 30, 39, 43). Using this system, gEnull, gInull, and Us9null PRV each were shown to have only a partial defect in anterograde spread, while a virus lacking all three proteins was totally defective (13).We sought to quantify the anterograde spread activity of gEnull, gInull, and Us9null HSV-1 using the Campenot chamber system. While gEnull and gInull viruses were completely defective at anterograde spread, we found that a Us9null virus retained wild-type (WT) anterograde spread activity in this system. This observation was unexpected, since others previously had reported that Us9 is required for efficient HSV-1 anterograde transport or spread (26, 41, 46). Therefore, we further characterized the neuronal spread properties of two independent Us9-deleted viruses in the mouse retina and mouse flank models of infection. Our results indicate that gE and gI are essential for HSV-1 anterograde spread, whereas Us9 is dispensable.     

The interaction between mobile DNAs and their hosts in a fluctuating environment

The interaction between mobile DNA sequences and their hosts raises important questions in the context of hosts which reproduce clonally with only rare horizontal transmission between clones. The activity of some mobile DNAs as reversible mutators of genes raises the possibility that, in a fluctuating environment, cells may gain an advantage if they have mobile DNAs which mutate genes whose inactivation is favoured in one of the environments that the population encounters. Here we analyse a model of this process and ask what would be the optimal rate of transposition in a population whose elements are maintained by this mechanism. We also examine the impact of horizontal transfer on such a population. With movement of elements between cells, we can imagine elements with differing rates of transposition and host cells with differing rates of transposition. We find that evolution in the population of elements favours a rapid rate of transposition, and evolution of the host cells favours cells in which this rapid rate of element-dependent transposition results in an optimal rate of transposition per cell. However, when horizontal transfer rates are high, some unexpected features of the model are observed. In particular, a polymorphism between cell types (some with an optimal rate of transposition and some with no transposition at all from endogenous elements) can be stably maintained. We consider the possible biological predictions of this analysis.     

Pterin-based ornamental coloration predicts yolk antioxidant levels in female striped plateau lizards (Sceloporus virgatus)

1. Maternal investment in egg quality can have important consequences for offspring fitness. For example, yolk antioxidants can affect embryonic development as well as juvenile and adult phenotype. Thus, females may be selected to advertise their yolk antioxidant deposition to discriminatory males via ornamental signals, perhaps depending on the reproductive costs associated with signal production. 2. Female striped plateau lizards (Sceloporus virgatus) develop pterin-based orange colour patches during the reproductive season that influence male behaviour and that are positively associated with the phenotypic quality of the female and her offspring. Here, we assessed one potential developmental mechanism underlying the relationship between offspring quality and female ornamentation in S. virgatus, by examining the relationship between ornament expression and yolk antioxidant levels. 3. As expected, concentrations of the yolk antioxidants vitamin A, vitamin E and carotenoids (lutein and zeaxanthin) were strongly positively intercorrelated. Eggs from larger clutches had fewer antioxidants than eggs from smaller clutches, suggesting that females may be limited in antioxidant availability or use. Fertilized and unfertilized eggs did not differ in yolk antioxidant levels. 4. The size of a female's ornament was positively related to both the concentration and total amount of yolk antioxidants, and ornament colour was positively related to yolk antioxidant concentration. Thus, in S. virgatus, female ornaments may advertise egg quality. In addition, these data suggest that more ornamented females may produce higher-quality offspring, in part because their eggs contain more antioxidants. As the colour ornament of interest is derived from pterins, not carotenoids, direct resource trade-offs between ornaments and eggs may be eliminated, reducing reproductive costs associated with signalling. 5. This is the first example of a positive relationship between female ornamentation and yolk antioxidants in reptiles and may indicate the general importance of these patterns in oviparous vertebrates.     

Maternal dietary carotenoids mitigate detrimental effects of maternal GnRH on offspring immune function in Japanese quail Coturnix japonica

Maternal resources deposited in eggs can affect the development of several offspring phenotypic traits and result in trade‐offs among them. For example, maternal androgens in eggs may be beneficial to offspring growth and competitive ability, but detrimental to immunocompetence and oxidative stress. In contrast, maternal antioxidants in eggs may be beneficial if they mitigate oxidative stress and immunosuppressive effects of androgens. We investigated possible interactive effects of maternal steroids and carotenoids on aspects of offspring physiology and phenotype, by simultaneously manipulating levels of androgens (via gonadotropin‐releasing hormone, GnRH‐challenges) and carotenoids (via diet supplementation) in captive female Japanese quail Coturnix japonica during egg laying. Carotenoid supplementation of hens, which elevates yolk concentrations of carotenoid and vitamins A and E, enhanced egg hatching success, offspring survival to age 15 d, and size of the bursa of Fabricius in offspring. In contrast, repeated maternal GnRH challenges, which elevated yolk testosterone concentrations, enhanced offspring neonatal size, but negatively affected bursa size. However, interaction among the treatments suggests that the positive effect of maternal carotenoid supplementation on plasma bactericidal capacity was mediated by maternal GnRH challenges. Chicks originating from carotenoid‐supplemented hens were less immunosuppressed than those originating from carotenoid‐supplemented + GnRH‐challenged hens, which were less immunosuppressed than chicks from GnRH‐challenged females not supplemented with carotenoids. Females availability of carotenoid enriched diets allows them to enhance the development of offspring immune system via carotenoids and vitamins deposited in egg yolks and offset detrimental effects of androgens deposited by GnRH‐challenged females.     

Reciprocal Regulation of Endocytosis and Metabolism

The cellular uptake of many nutrients and micronutrients governs both their cellular availability and their systemic homeostasis. The cellular rate of nutrient or ion uptake (e.g., glucose, Fe³⁺, K⁺) or efflux (e.g., Na⁺) is governed by a complement of membrane transporters and receptors that show dynamic localization at both the plasma membrane and defined intracellular membrane compartments. Regulation of the rate and mechanism of endocytosis controls the amounts of these proteins on the cell surface, which in many cases determines nutrient uptake or secretion. Moreover, the metabolic action of diverse hormones is initiated upon binding to surface receptors that then undergo regulated endocytosis and show distinct signaling patterns once internalized. Here, we examine how the endocytosis of nutrient transporters and carriers as well as signaling receptors governs cellular metabolism and thereby systemic (whole-body) metabolite homeostasis.Interactions between the cell and its environment obligatorily involve events at the plasma membrane. Cell-surface proteins mediate nutrient uptake, product release, and the sensing of environmental changes, including signals from other cells. Appropriate sensing and response to extracellular cues is essential for the individual cell’s survival and for the coordinated cellular behavior in multicellular organisms. Accordingly, maintenance and dynamics of membrane proteins are fundamental mechanisms of cellular homeostasis and survival.Most plasma membrane proteins are in defined equilibria with intracellular endosomal compartments, such that the amount of a given protein at the plasma membrane is determined by the balance of its endocytosis and its recycling back to the cell surface from endosomes and other intracellular compartments (Fig. 1). Changes in the kinetics of membrane protein traffic acutely affect the levels of individual proteins at the cell surface and thereby impact how cells intake nutrients, sense the environment, and respond to external cues.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Dynamic regulation of the cell-surface content of membrane proteins. Integral membrane proteins found at the cell surface are dynamically localized to the plasma membrane. The amount of any of these proteins at the cell surface is the result of the balance of exocytosis or recycling of vesicles containing that protein from intracellular membrane compartments and the endocytosis of the protein from the cell surface. Regulation of either the rate of exocytosis or endocytosis results in alteration of the cell-surface content of a given protein.Selective molecular mechanisms trigger traffic of plasma membrane proteins through endomembranes. Among them, ubiquitination and phosphorylation stand out as they can directly target the cargo proteins. Ubiquitination is the covalent attachment of the 76-amino acid polypeptide ubiquitin to the ε-amino group of specific lysine residues (reviewed by Miranda and Sorkin 2007; and see also Piper et al. 2014). Ubiquitination of cell-surface proteins is the principal mechanism of control of endocytosis in yeast (MacGurn et al. 2012), whereas in mammals, additional molecular mechanisms regulate the endocytosis of cell-surface proteins, including alterations in conformation that impact interaction with other proteins, and as mentioned, phosphorylation. Each of these modifications can either enhance or reduce the rates internalization, recycling, or degradation of specific proteins, highlighting the complexity of the regulation of endomembrane traffic. The intricate mechanisms that underlie the reciprocal regulation of endocytosis and metabolism are beginning to be understood. Here we discuss the endocytosis mechanisms in the regulation of cellular intake or efflux of iron, cholesterol, Na⁺, and glucose, and in the regulation of receptor signaling relevant to metabolism.     

Diversifying selection and host adaptation in two endosymbiont genomes

Background  

The endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis infects a broad range of arthropod and filarial nematode hosts. These diverse associations form an attractive model for understanding host:symbiont coevolution. Wolbachia 's ubiquity and ability to dramatically alter host reproductive biology also form the foundation of research strategies aimed at controlling insect pests and vector-borne disease. The Wolbachia strains that infect nematodes are phylogenetically distinct, strictly vertically transmitted, and required by their hosts for growth and reproduction. Insects in contrast form more fluid associations with Wolbachia. In these taxa, host populations are most often polymorphic for infection, horizontal transmission occurs between distantly related hosts, and direct fitness effects on hosts are mild. Despite extensive interest in the Wolbachia system for many years, relatively little is known about the molecular mechanisms that mediate its varied interactions with different hosts. We have compared the genomes of the Wolbachia that infect Drosophila melanogaster, w Mel and the nematode Brugia malayi, w Bm to that of an outgroup Anaplasma marginale to identify genes that have experienced diversifying selection in the Wolbachia lineages. The goal of the study was to identify likely molecular mechanisms of the symbiosis and to understand the nature of the diverse association across different hosts.