首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   2337篇
  免费   193篇
  2023年   3篇
  2022年   5篇
  2021年   33篇
  2020年   11篇
  2019年   14篇
  2018年   25篇
  2017年   25篇
  2016年   39篇
  2015年   108篇
  2014年   94篇
  2013年   118篇
  2012年   180篇
  2011年   161篇
  2010年   112篇
  2009年   115篇
  2008年   145篇
  2007年   159篇
  2006年   147篇
  2005年   133篇
  2004年   150篇
  2003年   168篇
  2002年   124篇
  2001年   34篇
  2000年   12篇
  1999年   38篇
  1998年   40篇
  1997年   33篇
  1996年   24篇
  1995年   33篇
  1994年   27篇
  1993年   23篇
  1992年   18篇
  1991年   20篇
  1990年   9篇
  1989年   22篇
  1988年   16篇
  1987年   9篇
  1986年   12篇
  1985年   6篇
  1984年   10篇
  1983年   9篇
  1982年   14篇
  1981年   8篇
  1979年   4篇
  1978年   9篇
  1977年   10篇
  1976年   4篇
  1974年   4篇
  1973年   2篇
  1966年   2篇
排序方式: 共有2530条查询结果,搜索用时 156 毫秒
991.
Oil bodies (OBs) are seed-specific lipid storage organelles that allow the accumulation of neutral lipids that sustain plantlet development after the onset of germination. OBs are covered with specific proteins embedded in a single layer of phospholipids. Using fluorescent dyes and confocal microscopy, we monitored the dynamics of OBs in living Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) embryos at different stages of development. Analyses were carried out with different genotypes: the wild type and three mutants affected in the accumulation of various oleosins (OLE1, OLE2, and OLE4), three major OB proteins. Image acquisition was followed by a detailed statistical analysis of OB size and distribution during seed development in the four dimensions (x, y, z, and t). Our results indicate that OB size increases sharply during seed maturation, in part by OB fusion, and then decreases until the end of the maturation process. In single, double, and triple mutant backgrounds, the size and spatial distribution of OBs are modified, affecting in turn the total lipid content, which suggests that the oleosins studied have specific functions in the dynamics of lipid accumulation.The seed is a complex, specific structure that allows a quiescent plant embryo to cope with unfavorable germinating conditions and also permits dissemination of the species. To achieve these functions, seeds accumulate reserve compounds that will ensure the survival of the embryo and fuel the growth of the plantlet upon germination. Accumulation of lipids occurs in many eukaryotic cells and is a rather common means of storing carbon and energy. Lipid droplets (LDs) can be found in all eukaryotes, such as yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Leber et al., 1994), mammals (Murphy, 2001; Hodges and Wu, 2010), Caenorhabditis elegans (Zhang et al., 2010; Mak, 2012), Drosophila melanogaster (Beller et al., 2006, 2010), and plants (Hsieh and Huang, 2004), but also in prokaryotes (Wältermann et al., 2005). The basic structure of an LD is a core of neutral lipids covered by a phospholipid monolayer. LDs differ between species by the set of proteins covering their surface, the nature of the lipids stored, and their turnover. Nevertheless, they apparently always ensure the same function in the cell (i.e. energy storage; Murphy, 2012). In Brassicacea species such as Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), seed reserves are mainly composed of carbohydrates, proteins, and lipids (Baud et al., 2002). The lipids are primarily stored as triacylglycerols (TAGs) in LDs, more commonly called oil bodies (OBs; Hsieh and Huang, 2004; Chapman et al., 2012; Chapman and Ohlrogge, 2012) of diameter 0.5 to 2 µm (Tzen et al., 1993).The protein composition of seed OBs has been determined for several plant species, including Brassica napus (Katavic et al., 2006; Jolivet et al., 2009) and Arabidopsis (Jolivet et al., 2004; D’Andréa et al., 2007; Vermachova et al., 2011). In Arabidopsis, 10 proteins have been identified, and seed-specific oleosins represent up to 79% of the OB proteins (Jolivet et al., 2004; D’Andréa et al., 2007; Vermachova et al., 2011). Oleosins are rather small proteins of 18.5 to 21.2 kD with a specific and highly conserved central hydrophobic domain of 72 amino acid residues flanked by hydrophilic domains of variable size and amino acid composition (Qu and Huang, 1990; Tzen et al., 1990, 1992; Huang, 1996; Hsieh and Huang, 2004). It is generally agreed that oleosins cover the OB surface, with their central hydrophobic domain inserted in the TAG through the phospholipid layer (Tzen and Huang, 1992). Besides their structural function in OBs, oleosins may serve as docking stations for other proteins at its surface (Wilfling et al., 2013) and may participate in the biosynthesis and mobilization of plant oils (Parthibane et al., 2012a, 2012b). Oleosins are probably involved in OB stability (Leprince et al., 1998; Shimada et al., 2008) and in the regulation of OB repulsion (Heneen et al., 2008), preventing the coalescence of OBs into a single organelle (Schmidt and Herman, 2008). Nevertheless, the precise functions of oleosins in OB biogenesis and dynamics have not yet been established.Global analysis of seed lipids can be performed using gas chromatography (Li et al., 2006), which allows the precise determination of both lipid content and fatty acid composition. Recently, direct organelle mass spectrometry has been used to visualize the lipid composition of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) seed OBs (Horn et al., 2011). Nevertheless, in both cases, the methods are destructive. To observe lipid accumulation at the subcellular level, well-known nondestructive techniques for lipid visualization have been adapted to seeds. Third harmonic generation microscopy (Débarre et al., 2006) and label-free coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy (Paar et al., 2012) allow dyeless observation of LDs but require very specific equipment. Magnetic resonance imaging enables topographic analysis of lipid distribution in cereal grains (Neuberger et al., 2008) and in submillimeter-sized seeds like those of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum; Fuchs et al., 2013). Nevertheless, the use of fluorescent dyes such as Nile Red (Greenspan and Fowler, 1985), BODIPY (Pagano et al., 1991), or LipidTOX (Invitrogen) associated with confocal microscopy is also a powerful way to monitor LDs in living organisms.Despite knowledge accumulated on this topic (Brasaemle and Wolins, 2012; Chapman et al., 2012), little is known about OB dynamics during seed maturation. In this article, we investigate this question by monitoring the evolution of OBs in living Arabidopsis embryos over time. This analysis showed a marked change in OB size at 9 to 10 d after flowering (DAF). We then examined single, double, and triple mutants of the major oleosins found in developing seeds (OLE1 [At4g25140], OLE2 [At5g40420], and OLE4 [At3g01570]; Jolivet et al., 2004). We analyzed the OB dynamics in these mutant backgrounds as if they would contain only these three proteins. We show that the lack of specific oleosins influences the dynamics and distribution of OBs during seed maturation, which in turn affects lipid accumulation. These results pave the way for analyzing specific functions of oleosins in the synthesis, growth, and evolution of OBs.  相似文献   
992.
993.
During the mitotic cell cycle, Geminin can act both as a promoter and inhibitor of initiation of DNA replication. As a promoter, Geminin stabilizes Cdt1 and facilitates its accumulation leading to the assembly of the pre-replication complex on DNA. As an inhibitor, Geminin prevents Cdt1 from loading the mini-chromosome maintenance complex onto pre-replication complexes in late S, G2, and M phases. Here we show that during meiosis Geminin functions as a stabilizer of Cdt1 promoting its accumulation for the early division cycles of the embryo. Depletion of Geminin in Xenopus immature oocytes leads to a decrease of Cdt1 protein levels during maturation and after activation of these oocytes. Injection of exogenous recombinant Geminin into the depleted oocytes rescues Cdt1 levels demonstrating that Geminin stabilizes Cdt1 during meiosis and after fertilization. Furthermore, Geminin-depleted oocytes did not replicate their DNA after meiosis I indicating that Geminin does not act as an inhibitor of initiation of DNA replication between meiosis I and meiosis II.In eukaryotes, initiation of DNA replication involves the formation and activation of the pre-replication complex (pre-RC)3 at the origins of replication. Pre-RCs are formed by the sequential binding of the origin recognition complex components, Cdc6, Cdt1, and mini-chromosome maintenance complex (MCM 2–7) proteins, to DNA. After loading the MCM complex, the pre-RCs are activated by S phase kinases (Dbf4-dependent kinase and Cdks) to initiate DNA replication (1). Replication of DNA, limited to only once per cell cycle, is critical to maintain genomic stability. Redundant mechanisms exist to ensure that DNA replication is tightly regulated during the cell cycle (1, 2). A small protein named Geminin has been shown to play a significant role in such regulatory mechanisms during mitosis (26). Geminin, a multifunctional 25-kDa protein, was first identified in a screen for proteins degraded during mitosis in Xenopus laevis egg extracts (7). Geminin is present in higher eukaryotes, but its presence in yeast has not yet been reported (710). Geminin plays a major role in regulating the function of Cdt1, one of the pre-RC components (8, 1113). Numerous studies suggest that in higher eukaryotes the interaction between Geminin and Cdt1 is pivotal to restrict DNA replication to only once per cell cycle (6, 1422). Furthermore, in Xenopus egg extracts, the Geminin/Cdt1 ratio seems to control the assembly of pre-RCs at replication origins and to determine whether the origins are licensed or not (23). The positive and negative roles of Geminin in origin licensing and DNA replication are made possible by their temporal separation during the cell cycle. Pre-RC formation occurs during late M and early G1 phase, whereas pre-RC inhibition occurs from late S to mid M phase.As a positive regulator of DNA replication, Geminin has been shown to stabilize Cdt1. In human osteosarcoma cells, silencing of GEMININ expression limits CDT1 accumulation during mitosis and therefore the formation of pre-RCs in the subsequent cell cycle. This stabilizing effect is the result of a direct interaction between CDT1 and GEMININ preventing CDT1 ubiquitination and degradation (13). Similar findings were also recently observed in normal human cells and various cancer cells (24). However, in both human normal and tumor cells, the low level of CDT1, generated by the absence of GEMININ, did not always prevent cellular proliferation or re-replication of the genome (5, 24, 25). Therefore, one might question the importance of the role of GEMININ in stabilizing CDT1 in human cells. Beyond its role as a stabilizer of Cdt1 levels, Geminin has also been shown to participate directly in the formation of pre-RCs in Xenopus egg extracts. A complex between Cdt1 and Geminin binds to chromatin and supports pre-RC assembly. However, the recruitment of additional Geminin molecules to this complex on the chromatin blocks further pre-RC formation. These results indicate that the stoichiometry of Cdt1 and Geminin in this complex regulates its activity as a promoter or inhibitor of pre-RC assembly and DNA replication (23, 26). Several mechanisms have been shown to modulate the Geminin/Cdt1 balance on the chromatin. In Xenopus the binding of Cdt1 to the MCM9 protein seems to block the recruitment of an excess of Geminin to the chromatin and therefore favors pre-RC assembly (27). Similarly, the inactivation of Geminin by either ubiquitination or degradation also has a positive effect on pre-RC assembly (8, 11, 2830). On the other hand, the replication-dependent degradation of Cdt1 has the opposite effect and prevents refiring of replication origins during S and G2 phases of the mitotic cell cycle (18, 20, 31).Although the role of Geminin during mitosis has been extensively studied, not much is known about its function during meiosis. The expression pattern of Geminin during oocyte maturation is unclear. The presence of Geminin in immature stage VI Xenopus oocytes is controversial, but the protein is fully expressed in mature oocytes arrested in metaphase of meiosis II (7, 32). To form haploid gametes, DNA replication has to be inhibited between meiosis I (MI) and meiosis II (MII). In Xenopus oocytes, cyclin B-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) also known as maturation-promoting factor (MPF) plays a role in preventing DNA replication between the two meiotic divisions (3336). Inhibition of Cdk1 activity between MI and MII leads to the formation of interphase nucleus and DNA replication. However, the role of Geminin in preventing DNA replication between meiotic divisions has not been tested so far. Finally, the possibility that Geminin stabilizes Cdt1 during meiosis and ensures its accumulation for the early embryonic divisions has not been formally examined.Here we show that the levels of Geminin and Cdt1 proteins increase significantly during meiosis in Xenopus oocytes and that the primary role of geminin is to promote the accumulation of Cdt1 and not to repress DNA replication between meiosis I and meiosis II. Depletion of Geminin in Xenopus immature oocytes does not lead to DNA replication after the first meiotic division but to a decrease in Cdt1 stability during the maturation and activation of these oocytes. Rescue of Cdt1 levels in these Geminin-depleted oocytes is achieved by injection of exogenous recombinant Geminin protein confirming the role of Geminin as a stabilizer of Cdt1 during meiosis and the early embryonic division cycles. These results provide further support for the idea that Geminin functions universally in stabilizing Cdt1. Although the stabilizing role of Geminin might not be its most important function in somatic cells, we show here that stabilizing Cdt1 is a dominant function for Geminin in Xenopus oocytes undergoing meiosis. This stabilizing role of Geminin is essential for the stockpiling of Cdt1 before fertilization that is required to sustain the rapid divisions of the early embryo.  相似文献   
994.
The eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system contributes to maintaining the fidelity of genetic information by correcting replication errors and preventing illegitimate recombination events. This study aimed to examine the function(s) of the Arabidopsis thaliana PMS1 gene (AtPMS1), one of three homologs of the bacterial MutL gene in plants. Two independent mutant alleles (Atpms1-1 and Atpms1-2) were obtained and one of these (Atpms1-1) was studied in detail. The mutant exhibited a reduction in seed set and a bias against the transmission of the mutant allele. Somatic recombination, both homologous and homeologous, was examined using a set of reporter constructs. Homologous recombination remained unchanged in the mutant while homeologous recombination was between 1.7- and 4.8-fold higher than in the wild type. This increase in homeologous recombination frequency was not correlated with the degree of sequence divergence. In RNAi lines, a range of increases in homeologous recombination were observed with two lines showing a 3.3-fold and a 3.6-fold increase. These results indicate that the AtPMS1 gene contributes to an antirecombination activity aimed at restricting recombination between diverged sequences. Liangliang Li, Eric Dion contributed equally to this work.  相似文献   
995.
Background: P-selectin is an adhesion receptor expressed on activated platelets and endothelial cells. Its natural ligand, P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1, is expressed on leucocytes and the P-selectin/PSGL-1 interaction is involved in leukocyte rolling. We have compared the interaction of P-selectin with several low molecular weight polysaccharides: fucoidan, heparin and dextran sulfate.  相似文献   
996.
997.
998.
Coronaviruses are positive-strand RNA viruses with features attractive for oncolytic therapy. To investigate this potential, we redirected the coronavirus murine hepatitis virus (MHV), which is normally unable to infect human cells, to human tumor cells by using a soluble receptor (soR)-based expression construct fused to an epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor targeting moiety. Addition of this adapter protein to MHV allowed infection of otherwise nonsusceptible, EGF receptor (EGFR)-expressing cell cultures. We introduced the sequence encoding the adaptor protein soR-EGF into the MHV genome to generate a self-targeted virus capable of multiround infection. The resulting recombinant MHV was viable and had indeed acquired the ability to infect all glioblastoma cell lines tested in vitro. Infection of malignant human glioblastoma U87ΔEGFR cells gave rise to release of progeny virus and efficient cell killing in vitro. To investigate the oncolytic capacity of the virus in vivo, we used an orthotopic U87ΔEGFR xenograft mouse model. Treatment of mice bearing a lethal intracranial U87ΔEGFR tumor by injection with MHVsoR-EGF significantly prolonged survival compared to phosphate-buffered saline-treated (P = 0.001) and control virus-treated (P = 0.004) animals, and no recurrent tumor load was observed. However, some adverse effects were seen in normal mouse brain tissues that were likely caused by the natural murine tropism of MHV. This is the first demonstration of oncolytic activity of a coronavirus in vivo. It suggests that nonhuman coronaviruses may be attractive new therapeutic agents against human tumors.Already for quite some years oncolytic viruses are being investigated for use in human tumor therapy (for recent reviews, see references 3, 16, 22, 37, and 44). Their success in destroying human cancer cells depends on their ability to selectively infect and kill these cells. Although some oncolytic viruses appear to have a natural tropism for tumor cells, most viruses need to be modified in some way to achieve infection and/or lytic activity in these cells. One of the ways to accomplish specific infection of tumor cells is by redirecting the virus to epitopes expressed on such cells. Thus, different targeting approaches have been explored for a variety of viruses. These include pseudotyping, modification of viral surface proteins, and the use of bispecific adapters (14, 35, 45). All of these approaches require that the viability of the virus is not hampered and that the targeting moiety is properly exposed to allow directed infection. The ability to genetically modify a particular virus combined with the availability of an appropriate targeting epitope determines the success of the approaches.Coronaviruses are enveloped, positive-strand RNA viruses belonging to the order Nidovirales. The nonhuman coronavirus murine hepatitis virus (MHV) is the best-studied coronavirus and, more importantly, convenient reverse genetics systems are available to modify its genome (19, 50). MHV has several appealing characteristics that might make it suitable as an oncolytic virus. First, it has a narrow host range, determined by the interaction of its spike (S) glycoprotein with the cellular receptor mCEACAM1a. Since mCEACAM1a is not expressed on human cells, MHV cannot establish an infection in either normal or cancerous human cells. Second, infection by MHV induces the formation of large multinucleated syncytia, to which also surrounding uninfected cells are recruited (42). Hence, given also its relatively short replication cycle (6 to 9 h), MHV destroys populations of cells rapidly once they have become infected. Third, the tropism of MHV can be modified either by substitution of the viral spike ectodomain (19) or by the use of adapter proteins (43, 47, 48). These adapter proteins, composed of a virus-binding moiety coupled to a target cell-binding device, can redirect the virus to a specific receptor on the target cell (43, 47, 48). The studies revealed that, once the host cell tropism barrier is alleviated, MHV is capable of establishing infection in nonmurine cells.The use of adapter proteins to target therapeutic viruses to tumor cells (modeled in Fig. Fig.1A)1A) is limited by the necessity to externally provide and replenish the adapter protein. To overcome this obstacle, the genetic information for the targeting device can be introduced into the viral genome to allow the virus to produce the adaptor itself in infected cells, thereby creating a self-targeted virus. Indeed, we demonstrated the feasibility of this concept by expressing an adapter protein—composed of the relevant (soluble) domain of the mCEACAM1a receptor linked to a His tag—as an additional protein from the MHV genome (43). We extend these investigations here by coupling the epidermal growth factor (EGF) protein to the mCEACAM1a fragment. Introduction of this expression cassette encoding the adapter protein allowed multiround infection in EGF receptor (EGFR)-expressing human cells, resulting in extensive cell-cell fusion and efficient killing of target human glioblastoma cells. Using an orthotopic intracranial tumor model of aggressive U87ΔEGFR glioblastomas in nude mice, we show for the first time that redirected coronavirus has oncolytic potential.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Redirection of MHV to the EGFR. (A) Rationale for using adapter proteins to target viruses to a specific receptor present on target cells. Adapters, either added or expressed from the viral genome when incorporated, enable targeted infection of otherwise nonsusceptible cells. (B) Schematic diagram of the expression constructs pSTsoR-h-His and pSTsoR-EGF. The Igκ signal sequence directs adapter protein secretion, the N-terminal D1 domain of mCEACAM1a (soR) provides for binding to and induction of conformational changes in the MHV spike protein, and the six-amino-acid His tag (His) provides for binding to the artificial His receptor. The hinge (h) linker region present in soR-h-His allows formation of disulfide-linked dimers of the resulting adapter protein (43) (T7, T7 promoter; myc, myc tag; ala3, alanine tripeptide). (C) Targeting of MHV-EFLM to the His receptor and to the EGFR on CHO cells using soR-h-His and soR-EGF, respectively. CHO, CHO-His.scFv, and CHO-EGFR cells were inoculated with MHV-EFLM preincubated with soR-h-His or soR-EGF, and the luciferase activities (expressed as relative light units [RLU]) were measured. The values depicted are the means of an experiment performed in triplicate. Error indicators show the standard deviations.  相似文献   
999.
Western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) are infected with a simian immunodeficiency virus (SIVgor) that is closely related to chimpanzee and human immunodeficiency viruses (SIVcpz and HIV-1, respectively) in west central Africa. Although existing data suggest a chimpanzee origin for SIVgor, a paucity of available sequences has precluded definitive conclusions. Here, we report the molecular characterization of one partial (BQ664) and three full-length (CP684, CP2135, and CP2139) SIVgor genomes amplified from fecal RNAs of wild-living gorillas at two field sites in Cameroon. Phylogenetic analyses showed that all SIVgor strains clustered together, forming a monophyletic lineage throughout their genomes. Interestingly, the closest relatives of SIVgor were not SIVcpzPtt strains from west central African chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) but human viruses belonging to HIV-1 group O. In trees derived from most genomic regions, SIVgor and HIV-1 group O formed a sister clade to the SIVcpzPtt lineage. However, in a tree derived from 5′ pol sequences (~900 bp), SIVgor and HIV-1 group O fell within the SIVcpzPtt radiation. The latter was due to two SIVcpzPtt strains that contained mosaic pol sequences, pointing to the existence of a divergent SIVcpzPtt lineage that gave rise to SIVgor and HIV-1 group O. Gorillas appear to have acquired this lineage at least 100 to 200 years ago. To examine the biological properties of SIVgor, we synthesized a full-length provirus from fecal consensus sequences. Transfection of the resulting clone (CP2139.287) into 293T cells yielded infectious virus that replicated efficiently in both human and chimpanzee CD4+ T cells and used CCR5 as the coreceptor for viral entry. Together, these results provide strong evidence that P. t. troglodytes apes were the source of SIVgor. These same apes may also have spawned the group O epidemic; however, the possibility that gorillas served as an intermediary host cannot be excluded.  相似文献   
1000.
Fish protein hydrolysates (FPH) have good and well documented functional properties. Peptides obtained from various fish protein hydrolysates have also shown bioactive and antioxidative activities.The aim of this study was to evaluate how storage and preparation of cod (Gadus morhua) backbones influence the yield, functionality, bioactivity (CGRP and gastrin/CCK related molecules) and antioxidative properties of fish protein hydrolysates. A series of hydrolysis trials have been carried out using backbones from cod that were initially fresh or frozen and further hydrolysed for different times (10, 25, 45 and 60 min). Use of fresh raw material significantly increased yield of dry FPH, gave lighter and less yellow powders with better emulsification properties. Longer time of hydrolysis gave higher FPH yield, increased degree of hydrolysis and decreased water holding capacity of the powders. Among the hydrolysis times tested, 25 and 45 min hydrolysis demonstrated the best emulsification properties.FPH have potential to enhance product stability by preventing oxidative deterioration. The DPPH scavenging activity showed that antioxidative activity of hydrolysates could be due to the ability to scavenge lipid radicals. The ability of hydrolysates to inhibit iron induced lipid oxidation was not influenced by time of hydrolysis.This work also shows that it is possible to obtain bioactive molecules from cod backbones by protein hydrolysis. The content of bioactive peptides (gastrin/CCK- and CGRP-like peptides) could make the cod hydrolysates useful for incorporation in functional foods.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号