Tempo and mode of concerted evolution in the L1 repeat family of mice

A 300-bp DNA sequence has been determined for 30 (10 from each of three species of mice) random isolates of a subset of the long interspersed repeat family L1. From these data we conclude that members of the L1 family are evolving in concert at the DNA sequence level in Mus domesticus, Mus caroli, and Mus platythrix. The mechanism responsible for this phenomenon may be either duplicative transposition, gene conversion, or a combination of the two. The amount of intraspecies divergence averages 4.4%, although between species base substitutions accumulate at the rate of approximately 0.85%/Myr to a maximum divergence of 9.1% between M. platythrix and both M. domesticus and M. caroli. Parsimony analysis reveals that the M. platythrix L1 family has evolved into a distinct clade in the 10-12 Myr since M. platythrix last shared a common ancestor with M. domesticus and M. caroli. The parsimony tree also provides a means to derive the average half-life of L1 sequences in the genome. The rates of gain and loss of individual copies of L1 were estimated to be approximately equal, such that approximately one-half of them turn over every 3.3 Myr.      

Facilitated Oligomerization of Mycobacterial GroEL: Evidence for Phosphorylation-Mediated Oligomerization

The distinctive feature of the GroES-GroEL chaperonin system in mediating protein folding lies in its ability to exist in a tetradecameric state, form a central cavity, and encapsulate the substrate via the GroES lid. However, recombinant GroELs of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are unable to act as effective molecular chaperones when expressed in Escherichia coli. We demonstrate here that the inability of M. tuberculosis GroEL1 to act as a functional chaperone in E. coli can be alleviated by facilitated oligomerization. The results of directed evolution involving random DNA shuffling of the genes encoding M. tuberculosis GroEL homologues followed by selection for functional entities suggested that the loss of chaperoning ability of the recombinant mycobacterial GroEL1 and GroEL2 in E. coli might be due to their inability to form canonical tetradecamers. This was confirmed by the results of domain-swapping experiments that generated M. tuberculosis-E. coli chimeras bearing mutually exchanged equatorial domains, which revealed that E. coli GroEL loses its chaperonin activity due to alteration of its oligomerization capabilities and vice versa for M. tuberculosis GroEL1. Furthermore, studying the oligomerization status of native GroEL1 from cell lysates of M. tuberculosis revealed that it exists in multiple oligomeric forms, including single-ring and double-ring variants. Immunochemical and mass spectrometric studies of the native M. tuberculosis GroEL1 revealed that the tetradecameric form is phosphorylated on serine-393, while the heptameric form is not, indicating that the switch between the single- and double-ring variants is mediated by phosphorylation.GroEL, an essential chaperonin, is known to form a ring-shaped structure for sequestering substrate proteins from the crowded cellular milieu and is responsible for the occurrence of various cellular processes, such as de novo folding, transport, and macromolecular assembly, within a biologically relevant time scale (7, 26, 48, 53). In Escherichia coli, GroEL, along with its cofactor GroES, assists the folding of about 10 to 30% of cytosolic proteins, among which some are known to be essential for cell viability (15, 26, 27, 31). GroEL was originally identified as the host factor responsible for phage λ and T4 capsid protein assembly and was subsequently shown to be essential for cell viability (17, 20). E. coli groEL is found in an operonic arrangement with groES (groESL), and its expression is regulated by multiple promoter elements.GroEL function has been shown to be a complex interplay between its interaction with and encapsulation of substrate proteins, with concomitant conformational changes induced by ATP binding, hydrolysis, and GroES binding (24, 56, 62). E. coli GroEL exists as a homotetradecamer forming two isologous rings of seven identical subunits each. Crystallographic analyses have delineated the three-domain architecture of GroEL monomers and the GroES-GroEL interactions (4, 63). The central region of the GroEL polypeptide, spanning amino acid residues 191 to 376, constitutes the GroES and substrate polypeptide-binding apical domain. The equatorial ATPase domain spanning two extremities of the GroEL polypeptide, that is, residues 6 to 133 and 409 to 523, is responsible for the ATPase activity and the bulk of intersubunit interactions. The hinge-forming intermediate domain, spanning two regions on the polypeptide, namely, residues 134 to 190 and 377 to 408, connects the said two domains in the tertiary structure. The conformational changes resulting from ATP binding and hydrolysis at the equatorial domain are coupled to those occurring at the apical domain via this hinge region (4, 63).The usual size limit for the substrate proteins, as shown by both in vitro and in vivo studies, is around 57 kDa, although the cis cavity is reported to theoretically accommodate larger proteins, on the order of 104 kDa (10, 27, 35, 46). Productive in vivo folding of the proteins larger than the usual size limit, such as the 86-kDa maltose binding protein fusion and 82-kDa mitochondrial aconitase, has also been reported (9, 29). Since such large substrates are difficult to accommodate in the central cavity, it has been suggested that their productive folding might occur outside the cis cavity. These studies therefore indicate that the substrate recognition patterns of GroEL may be more diverse than initially thought.Recent genome annotation studies of various bacteria have revealed that a few bacterial genomes possess multiple copies of groEL genes (2, 18, 30). The Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome bears two copies of groEL genes (groELs). One of these, groEL1, is arranged in an operon, with the cognate cochaperonin groES being the first gene, while the second copy, groEL2, exists separately on the genome (13). Recombinant mycobacterial GroELs were shown to possess biochemical features that deviated significantly from the trademark properties of E. coli GroEL. The most striking feature of M. tuberculosis GroELs, however, was their oligomeric state, where contrary to expectations, in vitro they did not form the canonical tetradecameric assembly when purified from E. coli. The proteins instead existed as lower oligomers (dimers) irrespective of the presence or absence of cofactors, such as the cognate GroES or ATP (40, 41). Furthermore, they displayed weak ATPase activities and GroES independence in preventing aggregation of the denatured polypeptides.Evolutionary studies of M. tuberculosis groEL sequences have suggested rapid evolution of the groEL1 gene, yet without turning these into pseudogenes (21). The other hypothesis suggests that M. tuberculosis, being an organism that grows slowly, might require GroEL function that does not utilize ATP rapidly but, rather, with a slow turnover rate. Alternately, additional mechanisms might exist in M. tuberculosis which could mediate regulated oligomerization of M. tuberculosis chaperonins. Such regulation might help in the controlled utilization of ATP in nutrient-deprived M. tuberculosis, as observed for other chaperones, such as small heat shock proteins (23).In the present study, we have exploited the unusual oligomeric status of the recombinant M. tuberculosis GroELs to study the significance of oligomer formation for GroEL''s function as a molecular chaperone. Furthermore, we have explored the possibility of the existence of regulated oligomerization for native M. tuberculosis GroELs in their natural setting. We first show that M. tuberculosis groEL genes are not capable of complementing a conditional allele of E. coli groEL, namely, groEL44. The results of phenotypic and biochemical analyses of GroEL variants obtained by gene shuffling and domain swapping suggest that the impaired chaperoning ability of recombinant M. tuberculosis GroELs is a consequence of their inability to form higher-order oligomers in E. coli and that oligomerization is the prelude to the formation of an active GroEL chaperonin. Further, by immunochemical and mass spectrometric (MS) analysis of native mycobacterial GroELs, we show that M. tuberculosis GroEL1 exists in multiple oligomeric forms, viz., monomeric, dimeric, heptameric (single ring), and tetradecameric (double ring) forms, and that the switch between single-ring and double-ring variants is operated by phosphorylation on a serine residue. These observations suggest that the determinants of oligomerization for M. tuberculosis GroEL1 are distinct from those of its E. coli counterpart and that it does oligomerize in M. tuberculosis (its native environment), whereas it loses its oligomerization capability when expressed in E. coli. It could thus be possible that M. tuberculosis GroEL1 requires a certain native M. tuberculosis protein, probably a eukaryotic-like Ser-Thr protein kinase, to oligomerize properly, though the precise reason cannot be discerned by these observations.     

A novel nucleoid-associated protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a sequence homolog of GroEL

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome sequence reveals remarkable absence of many nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs), such as HNS, Hfq or DPS. In order to characterize the nucleoids of M. tuberculosis, we have attempted to identify NAPs, and report an interesting finding that a chaperonin-homolog, GroEL1, is nucleoid associated. We report that M. tuberculosis GroEL1 binds DNA with low specificity but high affinity, suggesting that it might have naturally evolved to bind DNA. We are able to demonstrate that GroEL1 can effectively function as a DNA-protecting agent against DNase I or hydroxyl-radicals. Moreover, Atomic Force Microscopic studies reveal that GroEL1 can condense a large DNA into a compact structure. We also provide in vivo evidences that include presence of GroEL1 in purified nucleoids, in vivo crosslinking followed by Southern hybridizations and immunofluorescence imaging in M. tuberculosis confirming that GroEL1: DNA interactions occur in natural biological settings. These findings therefore reveal that M. tuberculosis GroEL1 has evolved to be associated with nucleoids.     

INDeGenIUS,a new method for high-throughput identification of specialized functional islands in completely sequenced organisms

Genomic islands (GIs) are regions in the genome which are believed to have been acquired via horizontal gene transfer events and are thus likely to be compositionally distinct from the rest of the genome. Majority of the genes located in a GI encode a particular function. Depending on the genes they encode, GIs can be classified into various categories, such as ‘metabolic islands’, ‘symbiotic islands’, ‘resistance islands’, ‘pathogenicity islands’, etc. The computational process for GI detection is known and many algorithms for the same are available. We present a new method termed as Improved N-mer based Detection of Genomic Islands Using Sequence-clustering (INDeGenIUS) for the identification of GIs. This method was applied to 400 completely sequenced species belonging to proteobacteria. Based on the genes encoded in the identified GIs, the GIs were grouped into 6 categories: metabolic islands, symbiotic islands, resistance islands, secretion islands, pathogenicity islands and motility islands. Several new islands of interest which had previously been missed out by earlier algorithms were picked up as GIs by INDeGenIUS. The present algorithm has potential application in the identification of functionally relevant GIs in the large number of genomes that are being sequenced. Investigation of the predicted GIs in pathogens may lead to identification of potential drug/vaccine candidates.