The making of a chloroplast

Since its endosymbiotic beginning, the chloroplast has become fully integrated into the biology of the host eukaryotic cell. The exchange of genetic information from the chloroplast to the nucleus has resulted in considerable co‐ordination in the activities of these two organelles during all stages of plant development. Here, we give an overview of the mechanisms of light perception and the subsequent regulation of nuclear gene expression in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, and we cover the main events that take place when proplastids differentiate into chloroplasts. We also consider recent findings regarding signalling networks between the chloroplast and the nucleus during seedling development, and how these signals are modulated by light. In addition, we discuss the mechanisms through which chloroplasts develop in different cell types, namely cotyledons and the dimorphic chloroplasts of the C₄ plant maize. Finally, we discuss recent data that suggest the specific regulation of the light‐dependent phases of photosynthesis, providing a means to optimize photosynthesis to varying light regimes.     

The covalent binding of 3-methylindole metabolites to bovine tissue

Tritiated 3-methylindole (3MI) was administered intravenously to calves. Total and covalent bound radioactivity were measured in different tissues. Pulmonary tissue showed the highest concentration of covalent bound radioactivity. (G-³H) or (methyl-¹⁴C) 3MI became covalently bound to microsomal protein when incubated with bovine lung microsomes. This covalent binding was dependent on time, temperature, oxygen and NADPH and was inhibited by SKF-525A, cytochrome c, a carbon monoxide enriched atmosphere and cysteine. The microsomal enzyme system catalysing covalent binding of 3MI has the classical characteristics of a cytochrome P-450 dependent mixed function oxidase. Metabolic activation of 3MI to a highly electrophilic intermediate, may be fundamental in the pathogenesis of 3MI induced pulmonary damage.     

Microfilaments and tropomyosin of cultured mammalian cells: isolation and characterization

Microfilaments were isolated from cultured mammalian cells, utilizing procedures similar to those for isolation of "native" thin filaments from muscle. Isolated microfilaments from rat embryo, baby hamster kidney (BHK- 21), and Swiss mouse 3T3 cells appeared structurally similar to muscle thin filaments, exhibiting long, 6 nm Diam profiles with a beaded, helical substructure. An arrowhead pattern was observed after reaction of isolated microfilaments with rabbit skeletal muscle myosin subfragment 1. Under appropriate conditions, isolated microfilaments will aggregate into a form that resembles microfilament bundles seen in situ cultured cells. Isolated microfilaments represent a complex of proteins including actin. Some of these components have been tentatively identified, based on coelectrophoresis with purified proteins, as myosin, tropomyosin, and a high molecular weight actin-binding protein. The tropomyosin components of isolated microfilaments were unexpected; polypeptides comigrated on SDS-polyacrylamide gels with both muscle and nonmuscle types of tropomyosin. In order to identify more specifically these subunits, we isolated and partially characterized tropomyosin from three cell types. BHK-21 cell tropomyosin was similar to other nonmuscle tropomyosins, as judged by several criteria. However, tropomyosin isolated from rate embryo and 3T3 cells contained subunits that comigrated with both skeletal muscle and nonmuscle types of myosin, whereas the BHK cell protein consistently contained a minor muscle-like subunit. The array of tropomyosin subunits present in a cell culture was reflected in the polypeptide chain pattern seen on SDS-polyacrylamide gels of microfilaments isolated from that culture. These studies provide a starting point for correlating changes in the ultrastructural organization of microfilaments with alterations in their protein composition.     

The consequence of passive administration of an anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 neutralizing monoclonal antibody before challenge of chimpanzees with a primary virus isolate.

The anti-gp41 virus neutralizing monoclonal antibody 2F5 was infused into chimpanzees, which were then given an intravenous challenge with a primary human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) isolate. In two control animals, the infection was established immediately, as evidenced by positive cell-associated DNA PCR and serum RNA PCR tests within 1 week, seroconversion by 4 weeks, and development of lymphadenopathy in this acute phase. Serum RNA PCR tests were negative in one of the two antibody-infused animals until week 8 and in the other antibody-infused animal until week 12; both animals seroconverted at week 14. The peak of measurable virus-specific serum RNA was delayed until week 16 in one antibody-infused animal. Virus-specific RNA in the other animal did not reach levels comparable to those in the other animals through 1 year of follow-up studies. Virus was isolated from the week 16 blood sample from one infused animal. Virus was not isolated from peripheral blood of the second animal but was isolated from lymph node cells taken at week 36. The infection of untreated chimpanzees with this primary isolate appears robust. Use of this isolate should widen the scope of possible experiments in the chimpanzee model. This antibody infusion study indicates that neutralizing antibody, when present at the time of challenge, affects the timing and level of infection and remains influential after it can no longer be detected in the peripheral circulation. It is possible that preexisting, neutralizing antibodies (passively administered or actively elicited) affect the course of acute-phase virus replication in humans. It remains to be established whether these immunologically mediated early effects will influence the course of HIV-1 disease.     

Spatial regulation of photosynthetic development in C4 plants

Leaf development in C4 plants requires the morphological and functional differentiation of two photosynthetic cell types (bundle sheath and mesophyll). Photosynthetic reactions are split between bundle sheath and mesophyll cells, with each cell type accumulating a specific complement of photosynthetic enzymes. Current evidence suggests that in order to activate this cell-specific expression of photosynthetic genes, bundle sheath and mesophyll cells must interpret positional information distributed locally around each vein.