The promoters of two carboxylases in a C4 plant (maize) direct cell-specific, light-regulated expression in a C3 plant (rice)

C₄ plants have two carboxylases which function in photosynthesis. One, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) is localized in mesophyll cells, and the other, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase (RuBPC) is found in bundle sheath cells. In contrast, C₃ plants have only one photosynthetic carboxylase, RuBPC, which is localized in mesophyll cells. The expression of PEPC in C₃ mesophyll cells is quite low relative to PEPC expression in C₄ mesophyll cells. Two chimeric genes have been constructed consisting of the structural gene encoding β-glucuronidase (GUS) controlled by two promoters from C₄ (maize) photosynthetic genes: (i) the PEPC gene (pepc) and (ii) the small subunit of RuBPC (rbcS). These constructs were introduced into a C₃ cereal, rice. Both chimeric genes were expressed almost exclusively in mesophyll cells in the leaf blades and leaf sheaths at high levels, and no or very little activity was observed in other cells. The expression of both genes was also regulated by light. These observations indicate that the regulation systems which direct cell-specific and light-inducible expression of pepc and rbcS in C₄ plants are also present in C₃ plants. Nevertheless, expression of endogenous pepc in C₃ plants is very low in C₃ mesophyll cells, and the cell specificity of rbcS expression in C₃ plants differs from that in C₄ plants. Rice nuclear extracts were assayed for DNA-binding protein(s) which interact with a cis-regulatory element in the pepc promoter. Gel-retardation assays indicate that a nuclear protein with similar DNA-binding specificity to a maize nuclear protein is present in rice. The possibility that differences in pepc expression in a C₃ plant (rice) and C₄ plant (maize) may be the result of changes in cis-acting elements between pepc in rice and maize is discussed. It also appears that differences in the cellular localization of rbcS expression are probably due to changes in a trans-acting factor(s) required for rbcS expression.     

Overview of a quality assurance/quality control compliance program consistent with FDA regulations and policies for somatic cell and gene therapies: a four year experience

Somatic cell and gene therapy involve the application of biological technologies to an individual patient through the use of living cells which provide a therapeutic benefit (Aliski, 1991). Various forms of cellular and gene therapies are being developed and evaluated in an increasing number of clinical trials for congential and acquired disorders. The potential and progress of these therapeutic applications have resulted in an increasing effort by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to develop the regulatory framework under which these therapeutic approaches would insure safety and efficacy, the primary mandate of the FDA.Over five years ago Cellcor began to define the parameters, specifications, and conditions relevant to a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) program that has evolved to insure safety and maximize the efficacy of applications of the company'sex vivo technology, autolymphocyte therapy. Autolymphocyte therapy is an outpatient form of somatic cell immunotherapy based upon the infusion of T cells that have been activatedex vivo using a combination of previously generated autologous cytokines and an anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody.We have been able to demonstrate the feasibility for the safe, controlled, and consistent preparation and delivery of a cellular therapy by application of relevant GMP regulations. This presentation reviews aspects of this program and chronicles our experience which at present amounts to over 4400 infusions for over 700 patients. This program provides a high degree of assurance that a cellular therapy program can be carried out in a multisite mode involving hundreds of patients through the strict adherence to cGMP as set forth in existing regulations. It would be prudent that developers of cellular andex vivo gene therapies establish a similar cell processing and QA/QC infrastructure at an early developmental stage to optimize safety and reproducibility and facilitate regulatory review.     

The Presequence of a Precursor to the {delta}-Subunit of Sweet Potato Mitochondrial F1ATPase is not Sufficient for the Transport of {beta}-Glucuronidase (GUS) into Mitochondria of Tobacco, Rice and Yeast Cells

A precursor to the     

Roles of multiple glucose transporters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, TRK1 and TRK2 are required for high- and low-affinity K+ transport. Among suppressors of the K+ transport defect in trk1 delta trk2 delta cells, we have identified members of the sugar transporter gene superfamily. One suppressor encodes the previously identified glucose transporter HXT1, and another encodes a new member of this family, HXT3. The inferred amino acid sequence of HXT3 is 87% identical to that of HXT1, 64% identical to that of HXT2, and 32% identical to that of SNF3. Like HXT1 and HXT2, overexpression of HXT3 in snf3 delta cells confers growth on low-glucose or raffinose media. The function of another new member of the HXT superfamily, HXT4 (previously identified by its ability to suppress the snf3 delta phenotype; L. Bisson, personal communication), was revealed in experiments that deleted all possible combinations of the five members of the glucose transporter gene family. Neither SNF3, HXT1, HXT2, HXT3, nor HXT4 is essential for viability. snf3 delta hxt1 delta hxt2 delta hxt3 delta hxt4 delta cells are unable to grow on media containing high concentrations of glucose (5%) but can grow on low-glucose (0.5%) media, revealing the presence of a sixth transporter that is itself glucose repressible. This transporter may be negatively regulated by SNF3 since expression of SNF3 abolishes growth of hxt1 delta hxt2 delta hxt3 delta hxt4 delta cells on low-glucose medium. HXT1, HXT2, HXT3, and HXT4 can function independently: expression of any one of these genes is sufficient to confer growth on medium containing at least 1% glucose. A synergistic relationship between SNF3 and each of the HXT genes is suggested by the observation that SNF2 hxt1 delta hxt2 delta hxt3 delta hxt4 delta cells and snf3 delta HXT1 HXT2 HXT3 HXT4 cells are unable to grow on raffinose (low fructose) yet SNF3 in combination with any single HXT gene is sufficient for growth on raffinose. HXT1 and HXT3 are differentially regulated. HXT1::lacZ is maximally expressed during exponential growth whereas HXT3::lacZ is maximally expressed after entry into stationary phase.     

中国海桑属小志

本文描述中国海桑属一新种:拟海桑(Sonneratia paracaseolaris Ko, E. Y. Chen et W. Y.Chen).重新发表海桑属7种检索表,并将原隶属海桑组的海南海桑S.hainanensis Ko, E. Y.Chenet W.Y.Chen改隶无瓣海桑组,因其过去被认为是花瓣的部分实为退化雄蕊.     

Purification of antibacterial attacins induced in Hyalophora cecropia pupae immunized with Enterobacter cloacae C7-501 using ion-exchange chromatography,hydrophobic interaction chromatography,and Rotofor® isoelectric focusing

Hyalophora cecropia pupae were infected by Enterobacter cloacae C7-501 to induce antibacterial attacins for purification. The induction of attacins in immunized pupae was confirmed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Ion-exchange chromatography (IEC), hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC), and Rotofor® isoelectric focusing (ISEF) were applied to isolate attacins from the hemolymph. IEC separated attacins from most hemolymph proteins, but the fractions containing attacins also had other proteins of 20 and 64 kDa in length. In IEC, attacin was eluted with ~0.2 M NaCl. The best conditions for IEC were pH 9, flow rate of 2 mL/min, with step elution (0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 1.0 M NaCl). In HIC, most other proteins were eluted with the ammonium persulfate treatment. HIC isolated attacin proteins under hydrophobic conditions, at ~50% EtOH. However, the fraction with attacins also contained other proteins. The Rotofor® ISEF produced fractions containing attacins at isoelectric points ranging between 5.7 and 8.3. However, non-specific proteins were detected in the fraction samples, and the recovery of attacins was low. The purification efficiency of ISEF was lower than IEC and HIC. In this study, the expression of attacins was induced in H. cecropia pupae infected with E. cloacae C7-501, and attacins could be purified by IEC and ISEF. Overall, IEC provided better separation of attacins from the hemolymph of H. cecropia pupae immunized with E. cloacae bacteria than HIC and Rotofor® ISEF.