EEG analysis by means of the Parcor coefficients

The present study demonstrates the statistical qualities of electrical brain activity by using Parcor coefficients. As a result, the statistical interference of the EEG samples under consideration turns out to be relatively small, implying constraints on the interpretion of the spectra, as well as on the operational calculus of the Wiener criterion. An algorithm based on the linear prediction filter is provided which, moreover, makes use of the Toeplitz structure of the covariance matrix. Although not discussed here, the application of the Parcor coefficients to the general problem of model building is apparent.     

Comparison of four routinely used vitamin D automated immunoassays

BackgroundTo compare four automated immunoassays for the measurement of 25(OH)-vitamin D (25-OHD) and to assess the impact on the results obtained from a healthy population.MethodsWe analysed 100 serum samples on Unicel DxI 800 (Beckman Coulter), Architect i1000 (Abbott), Cobas e411 (Roche) and Liaison XL (DiaSorin). Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plots were used for method comparison. In order to categorise the obtained values, results were categorised into the following groups: 0-25 nmol/L, 25-50 nmol/L, 50-75 nmol/L and above 75 nmol/L and compared. The percentage of samples below 75 nmol/L, and below 50 nmol/L was then calculated for every method.ResultsAccording to paired comparisons, each method differs from others (p<0.0001) except Cobas vs Architect, which do not show a statistically significant difference (p=0.39). The strongest correlation was found between Liaison and Architect (ρ=0.94, p<0.0001). The percentage of samples below the recommended value of 75 nmol/L were: 70% (Architect), 92% (Liaison), 71% (Cobas) and 89% (Unicel). The percentage of samples below the value of 50 nmol/L were: 17% (Architect), 55% (Liaison), 28% (Cobas) and 47% (Unicel).ConclusionsThe observed differences stem from the use of different analytical systems for 25-OHD concentration analysis and can result in different outcomes. The recommended values should be established for each assay in accordance with the data provided by the manufacturer or in the laboratory, in accordance with proper standardisation.