Un cas de mosaïcisme avec grand chromosome surnuméraire

Sans résuméRecherches effectuées avec l'appui du Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique Médicale et du Fonds de la Recherche Fondamentale Collective (Belgique).     

Ecosystem-level effects of re-oligotrophication and N:P imbalances in rivers and estuaries on a global scale

Trends and ecological consequences of phosphorus (P) decline and increasing nitrogen (N) to phosphorus (N:P) ratios in rivers and estuaries are reviewed and discussed. Results suggest that re-oligotrophication is a dominant trend in rivers and estuaries of high-income countries in the last two–three decades, while in low-income countries widespread eutrophication occurs. The decline in P is well documented in hundreds of rivers of United States and the European Union, but the biotic response of rivers and estuaries besides phytoplankton decline such as trends in phytoplankton composition, changes in primary production, ecosystem shifts, cascading effects, changes in ecosystem metabolism, etc., have not been sufficiently monitored and investigated, neither the effects of N:P imbalance. N:P imbalance has significant ecological effects that need to be further investigated. There is a growing number of cases in which phytoplankton biomass have been shown to decrease due to re-oligotrophication, but the potential regime shift from phytoplankton to macrophyte dominance described in shallow lakes has been documented only in a few rivers and estuaries yet. The main reasons why regime shifts are rarely described in rivers and estuaries are, from one hand the scarcity of data on macrophyte cover trends, and from the other hand physical factors such as peak flows or high turbidity that could prevent a general spread of submerged macrophytes as observed in shallow lakes. Moreover, re-oligotrophication effects on rivers may be different compared to lakes (e.g., lower dominance of macrophytes) or estuaries (e.g., limitation of primary production by N instead of P) or may be dependent on river/estuary type. We conclude that river and estuary re-oligotrophication effects are complex, diverse and still little known, and in some cases are equivalent to those described in shallow lakes, but the regime shift is more likely to occur in mid to high-order rivers and shallow estuaries.     

Inputs from upper airway affect firing of respiratory-associated midbrain neurons

Chen, Zibin, and Frederic L. Eldridge. Inputs fromupper airway affect firing of respiratory-associated midbrain neurons. J. Appl. Physiol. 83(1): 196-203, 1997.In 16 decerebrated unanesthetized cats, we studied effects ofneural inputs from upper airway on firing of 62 mesencephalic neuronsthat also developed respiratory-associated (RA) rhythmic firing whenrespiratory drive was high [Z. Chen, F. L. Eldridge, and P.G.Wagner. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 437:305-325, 1991] and on firing of 16 neurons that did notdevelop the rhythmic firing (non-RA neurons). Activity in RA neuronsincreased after mechanical expansion of pharynx (45% of those tested)or larynx (68%) and after stimulation of glossopharyngeal (50%) orsuperior laryngeal nerves (77%). The increased neuronal firingoccurred despite decreases or abolition of respiratory activity(expressed in phrenic nerve). Neuronal firing also increased aftermechanical stimulation of nasal mucosa (66%) or by jetsof air directed into the nares (48%) and after lightbrushing of nasal skin (~40%). Most stimuli led to decreased firingin a smaller number of neurons, and some neurons showed no response.None of the non-RA neurons developed an increase of firing after any ofthe stimuli, although one had decreased firing after stimulation of thesuperior laryngeal nerve. We conclude that inputs from the upper airwayand nasal skin have independent modulatory effects on the samemesencephalic neurons that are stimulated by ascending rhythmic RAinput from the medulla. These findings may have relevance to generationof the sensation of dyspnea.

     

Foraging ecology of hoverflies: morphology of the mouthparts in relation to feeding on nectar and pollen in some common urban species

Abstract. 1. Previous accounts of the feeding behaviour of hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) are contradictory and in many cases do not correspond with field observations.
2. Patterns of feeding on nectar and pollen differ between species: these patterns are correlated with morphological differences.
3. The data indicate that there are two correlates of increasing tongue length: first, the proportion of pollen in the diet decreases; and second, the flies concentrate on visiting flowers with longer corollae, which contain more nectar sugar.
4. Reasons for these effects are discussed.     

Mechanism for the increase in plasma renin activity by pentobarbital anesthesia

The mechanism by which pentobarbital anesthesia causes increases in plasma renin activity (PRA) was examined in dogs infused with either propranolol or indomethacin, an inhibitor of prostaglandin synthetase. Infusion of propranolol at 1 mg/kg, (I.V.) followed by 0.6–0.7 mg/kg/hr decreased PRA from 6.98±2.49 ng/m1/hr during control periods to 1.58±0.79 ng/m1/hr 30 minutes after the injection of propranolol (P<0.025). Subsequent induction of anesthesia with sodium pentobarbital caused PRA to rise to 3.87±0.93 ng/m1/hr in 30 minutes. (P<0.01). Plasma potassium concentration decreased from 4.6±0.2 mEq/L to reach 4.0±0.1 mEq/L 30 minutes after induction of anesthesia (P<0.005). Infusion of indomethacin at 5 mg/kg, (I.V.) followed by 1.5 ? 3.1 mg/kg/hr into conscious dogs did not decrease PRA. In contrast to the report by Montgomery et al (Fed. Proc. 36: 989, 1977), we found that the increase in PRA after pentobarbital anesthesia could not be blocked by indomethacin. PRA was 5.3±1.2 ng/m1/hr(M ± SEM) during control periods and was 4.7±1.4 ng/m1/hr 30 minutes after the infusion of indomethacin (P<0.1). PRA increased to 10.9±2.3 ng/m1/hr, 9.2±2.2 ng/m1/hr, and 7.7±1.7 ng/m1/hr at 5, 15 and 30 minutes, respectively, after the administration of pentobarbital (P<0.005, P<0.025, P<0.05). PRA declined to 4.2±1.3 ng/m1/hr 60 minutes after pentobarbital anesthesia (P<0.1). It is concluded that the mechanism by which pentobarbital causes increases in PRA is independent of prostaglandins.