Hyporheic biofilms — a potential food source for interstitial animals

Glass-beads (diam. = 250 μm) were buried 10 cm deep in the sediment of a stream. After an exposure of eight weeks, bacterial densities on the beads varied between 2.7 × 10⁵ and 2.4 × 10⁷/cm², and the length of the fungal mycelium between 0.2 and 5.3 mm/cm². Bacterial densities did not show any correlation with the DOC content of the water, but were positively correlated with respiration on the beads. Fungal mycelium was negatively correlated with water temperature. Acid hydrolysis of stream-exposed beads released sugars and amino acids, whose combined carbon content exceeded that of the microbial cells by a factor of at least 4. Gut extracts of Gammarus tigrinus and Tipula caloptera released amino acids and sugars from stream-exposed beads.     

Epizoic and parasitic rotifers

Many rotifer species live in close association with plants or other animals. Most of these associations are of a commensal or synoecious nature, some rotifer species having lost the ability to live independently. Few rotifers are true parasites, actually harming their hosts.The Seisonidae, Monogononta and Bdelloidea include epizoic and parasitic species. The most widely known are probably the parasites of colonial and filamentous algae (e.g. Volvox, Vaucheria). However, rotifers are also found on a wide range of invertebrates: colonial, sessile Protozoa; Porifera; Rotifera; Annelida; Bryozoa; Echinodermata; Mollusca, especially on the shells and egg masses of aquatic gastropods; Crustacea, including the lower forms (e.g. Daphnia, Asellus, Gammarus) and in the gill chambers of Astacus and Chasmagnathus; the aquatic larvae of insects. There appear to be few records of epizoic or parasitic rotifers among vertebrates, apart from Encentrum kozminskii on carp, Limnias ceratophylli on the Amazonian crocodile, Melanosuchus niger, and an unidentified Bdelloid apparently living as a pathogenic rotifer in Man.     

Characteristic chromosome abnormalities,including rearrangements of 6p,del(7q), +12, and t(12;14), in 44 uterine leiomyomas

Summary The cytogenetic analysis of 224 leiomyomas from 138 patients is presented. An insufficient number of mitoses was found in 35 tumors, normal karyotypes in 145, and clonal chromosome aberrations were detected in 44. The three previously identified cytogenetic subgroups were all represented in this series: del(7) (q21.2q31.2) was found in 11, trisomy 12 in five, and t(12;14)(q14-15;q23-24) in one leiomyoma. Rearrangements of 6p, including deletions, inversions, and various translocations, were found in eight tumors, thus delineating a new cytogenetic subgroup of uterine leiomyoma. The remaining 21 karyotypically abnormal tumors had nonrecurrent changes. One leiomyoma had two cytogenetically unrelated clones characterized by del(7)(q21.2 q31.2) and +12. Karyotypic changes in two separate leiomyomas from the same uterus were identified in five patients; in three of them, different anomalies were found in the two tumors, whereas cytogenetically identical aberrations – del(7q) and dic(21;22) – were detected in two macroscopically discrete tumors. These findings suggest that whereas some multiple leiomyomas originate independently, others may be derived from the same neoplastic clone.