Individual and age differences in the feeding ecology of Oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus wintering on the Exe Estuary, Devon

The habitats and foods used by a sample of marked individuals and by the whole population of Oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus wintering on the Exe estuary, South Devon, are described. In the spring and early summer, only a few hundred immatures were present. Two thousand adults and several hundred juveniles arrived in late summer from the breeding grounds and remained until the following spring. The majority of the birds were then adults. At low water, most adults fed on the mussel Mytilus edulis beds and ate mussels. Most individuals specialised on this prey and ate little else. Some adults fed on mud-flats and sandflats within the estuary and along the coast, and specialised on a mixture of Nereis diversicolor and Scrobicularia plana or on Cerastoderma edule or Littorina spp. Though some juveniles ate mussels from the time they arrived, most did not. In winter, they took Scrobicularia on mudflats, earthworms Lumbricidae and leatherjackets Tipulidae larvae in fields and Spisula and mussels along the coast. At other times of year they mainly ate Nereis. However, as they grew older, more birds began to specialise on mussels, especially in their second, third and fourth summers when the adults were away. At high water, most birds roosted at the mouth of the estuary or along the coast. However, several hundred fed in the fields in winter with more doing so late in the winter on warm days on Neap tides when less time was available for feeding on the estuary in daylight. Birds feeding on Nereis and Scrobicularia at low water were most often seen in the fields, irrespective of age. Birds feeding on Mytilus and Littorina occurred there rarely, but no bird eating Cerastoderma was seen there. The findings are discussed in relation to age differences in feeding skills and ability to compete successfully with other birds.     

Basipetal Gradient of Axillary Bud Inhibition Along a Rose (Rosa hybridaL.) Stem: Growth Potential of Primary Buds and their Two Most Basal Secondary Buds as Affected by Position and Age

InRosa hybridaL. cv. Ruidriko ‘Vivaldi’®, theeffect of position on growth and development potentials of axillarybuds was investigated by single internode cuttings excised alongthe floral stem and its bearing shoot. The experiments werecarried out in both glasshouses and in a phytotron. The studyfirstly concerned the development of the primary shoot fromthe onset of bud growth until anthesis. The primary shoot wasthen bent horizontally to promote the growth of the two mostproximal secondary buds, the collateral buds, already differentiatedinside the primary bud. They gave rise to basal shoots. In thebasipetal direction, the axillary buds along the floral stemexhibited both an increase in the lag time before bud growthand a decrease in bud growth percentage, demonstrating the existenceof a physiological basipetal gradient of inhibition intrinsicto the buds or due to short range correlations. The same basipetalgradient of inhibition was observed along the floral stem andits bearing shoot, demonstrating that the age of the bud wasnot a major factor in determining the rate of bud growth. Afterbending the primary shoot, the percentage of collateral budgrowth was also affected by the cutting position. The more proximalthe cutting, the lower the sprouting ability of collateral buds.The growth potential of these buds appeared to be already determinedinside the main bud before cutting excision.Copyright 1998 Annalsof Botany Company Axillary bud; basal shoot; cutting; development; endodormancy; growth; paradormancy; position; primary shoot;Rosa hybridaL.; rose; secondary bud; topophysis.