Development of efficient one-pot three-component assembly of trityl olmesartan medoxomil

We have elaborated a one-pot three-component assembly of trityl olmesartan medoxomil starting from commercially available ethyl 4-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-2-propyl-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate, 5-(4′-(bromomethyl)-[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-yl)-1-trityl-1H-tetrazole and 4-(chloromethyl)-5-methyl-1,3-dioxol-2-one intermediates. The developed and optimized one-pot process provides 72–75% yield of trityl olmesartan medoxomil over three steps, which represents in average ca. 90% yield per synthetic step, on a 300?g scale. The process is conducted in simple fashion and provides highly pure trityl olmesartan medoxomil (up to 97.5% by HPLC), which can be easily converted to olmesartan medoxomil that fully complies with all ICH requirements. Furthermore, the described process significantly improves the primary process to trityl olmesartan medoxomil by drastic reduction of required unit operations and application of single reaction solvent through the reaction sequence. Moreover, the amount of used organic solvents was notably reduced. The developed process has provided solid bases for industrial production of trityl olmesartan medoxomil.     

奥美沙坦对慢性心力衰竭患者血清Galectin-3水平的影响

目的：探讨奥美沙坦对慢性心力衰竭患者血清半乳凝集素-3（Galectin-3）水平的影响。方法：入选慢性心力衰竭患者100例,随机分为2组,对照组和奥美沙坦治疗组,每组50例,持续治疗3月。其中对照组男32例,女18例,平均年龄（53.2±11.8）;奥美沙坦治疗组,男35例,女15例,平均年龄为（52.6±13.2）岁。超声心动图评估治疗前后心功能,采用双抗体酶联免疫吸附（ELISA）法测定血清Galectin-3和N末端B型钠尿肽（NT-proBNP）水平。结果：对照组治疗和奥美沙坦治疗均可以改善慢性心力衰竭患者的射血分数（EF）,降低NT-proBNP和Galectin-3的浓度。其中,对比对照组患者,奥美沙坦治疗的患者心功能改善的程度更明显,并伴有血清Galectin-3的明显下降,差异具有统计学意义,P〈0.05。Pearson相关分析结果显示,慢性心力衰竭患者血清Galectin-3水平与心功能指标EF和NT-proBNP均相关,相关系数分别为-0.563和0.605,统计学有意义（P〈0.05）。结论：奥美沙坦治疗能有效降低慢性心力衰竭患者血清Galectin-3水平和改善心功能。     

奥美沙坦对慢性心力衰竭患者血清Galectin-3 水平的影响

目的：探讨奥美沙坦对慢性心力衰竭患者血清半乳凝集素-3（Galectin-3）水平的影响。方法：入选慢性心力衰竭患者100 例, 随机分为2 组,对照组和奥美沙坦治疗组,每组50 例,持续治疗3 月。其中对照组男32 例,女18 例,平均年龄（53.2± 11.8）;奥美 沙坦治疗组,男35 例,女15 例,平均年龄为（52.6± 13.2）岁。超声心动图评估治疗前后心功能,采用双抗体酶联免疫吸附(ELISA) 法测定血清Galectin-3 和N 末端B 型钠尿肽（NT-proBNP）水平。结果：对照组治疗和奥美沙坦治疗均可以改善慢性心力衰竭患 者的射血分数（EF）,降低NT-proBNP和Galectin-3 的浓度。其中,对比对照组患者,奥美沙坦治疗的患者心功能改善的程度更明 显,并伴有血清Galectin-3 的明显下降,差异具有统计学意义,P<0.05。Pearson 相关分析结果显示,慢性心力衰竭患者血清 Galectin-3 水平与心功能指标EF和NT-proBNP均相关,相关系数分别为-0.563和0.605,统计学有意义（P<0.05）。结论：奥美沙坦 治疗能有效降低慢性心力衰竭患者血清Galectin-3 水平和改善心功能。     

Administration‐Time‐Dependent Effects of Olmesartan on the Ambulatory Blood Pressure of Essential Hypertension Patients

Previous studies established that a single daily dose of olmesartan remains effective for the entire 24 h without alteration of the day‐night blood pressure (BP) pattern. On the other hand, the administration of valsartan or telmisartan at bedtime, as opposed to upon wakening, improves the sleep‐time relative BP decline toward a greater dipper pattern without loss of 24 h efficacy. Yet to be determined is whether this administration‐time‐dependent efficacy is a class‐related feature, characteristic of all angiotensin‐receptor‐blocker (ARB) medications. We studied 123 grade 1 and 2 hypertensive patients, 46.6±12.3 yrs of age, randomly assigned to receive olmesartan (20 mg/day) as a monotherapy either upon awakening or at bedtime for three months. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring for 48 consecutive hours before and after treatment. The 24 h BP reduction was similar for both treatment times. Administration of olmesartan at bedtime, however, was significantly more efficient than morning administration in reducing the nocturnal BP mean. The sleep‐time relative BP decline was slightly reduced with olmesartan ingestion upon awakening but significantly increased with ingestion at bedtime, thus reducing the prevalence of non‐dipping from baseline by 48%. Olmesartan administration at bedtime, as opposed to in the morning, improved the awake/asleep BP ratio toward a greater dipper pattern without loss of 24 h efficacy. Nocturnal BP regulation was significantly better achieved with bedtime as compared to morning dosing of olmesartan. These effects are comparable to those previously reported for valsartan and telmisartan, thus suggesting that they may be class‐related features of ARB medications in spite of differences in their half‐life kinetics. These administration‐time‐dependent effects should be taken into account when prescribing ARB medications for treatment of essential hypertension     

奥美沙坦减轻高脂饮食诱导的非酒精性脂肪肝病的机制研究

目的探讨奥美沙坦对于高脂诱导的非酒精性脂肪肝病（NAFLD）的影响及可能机制。方法健康雄性8周龄C57BL／6小鼠24只随机分为高脂组（n=16）和正常饮食组（n=8）,高脂组小鼠高脂饮食（60％的脂肪）12w后再随机分为高脂饮食对照组（n=8）、高脂饮食治疗组（n=8）。高脂饮食治疗组小鼠给予0．75mg／kg／d的奥美沙坦灌胃8w,灌胃结束后处理小鼠,留取空腹血样本检测AST和ALT。肝组织冰冻切片行油红O染色观察脂肪变;石蜡切片行HE和F4／80免疫组化染色观察肝脏炎症变化;实时荧光定量PCR检测肝脏TNF-α和IL-6mRNA的表达水平;WesternBlot检测肝组织中IκB-α、p-IκBa、NF—κB信号通路的活化。结果奥美沙坦显著抑制了高脂诱导的NAFLD脂肪变性,并明显改善肝功能。实时荧光定量PCR结果表明奥美沙坦能显著降低肝脏组织中TNF-α和IL-6mRNA表达水平（P〈0．05）;Western Blot结果显示奥美沙坦显著抑制肝脏NF-κB信号通路活化。结论奥美沙坦显著抑制NAFLD小鼠肝脏炎性病变而保护肝功能,其机制与抑制NF-κB信号通路活化以及降低肝脏TNF-α和IL-6mRNA水平有关。     

Comparison of the Efficacy of Morning versus Evening Administration of Olmesartan in Uncomplicated Essential Hypertension

A total of 18 diurnally active subjects with uncomplicated, mild to moderate, essential hypertension were studied to compare the efficacy of the morning versus evening administration of an oral olmesartan medication. After a two‐week, wash‐out/placebo run‐in period, subjects with clinic diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mm Hg and <110 mm Hg began 12 weeks of 20 mg olmesartan medoxomil tablet therapy at 08:00 h daily. Four of the 18 subjects required dose escalation to 40 mg at eight weeks because of clinic DBP≥90 mm Hg. After the 12‐week period of once‐a‐day 08:00 h treatment, subjects were immediately switched to an evening (20:00 h) drug‐ingestion schedule for another 12‐week period without change in dose. Subjects underwent 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) before the initiation of morning treatment and at the end of both the 12‐week morning and evening treatment arms. Dosing time did not exert statistically significant differences on the efficacy of olmesartan: the reduction from baseline in the 24 h mean systolic (SBP) and DBP was, respectively, 18.8 and 14.6 mm Hg with morning dosing and 16.1 and 13.2 mm Hg with evening dosing (p>0.152 between groups). The amplitude of the BP 24 h pattern did not vary with dosing time, indicating full 24 h BP reduction no matter the clock hour of treatment. Although, the BP‐lowering effect was somewhat better with morning dosing, the results of this study suggest that the studied olmesartan medoxomil preparation efficiently reduces BP when ingested in the morning (08:00 h) or evening (20:00 h) in equivalent manner, based on statistical testing, throughout the 24 h.     

Estimating Antihypertensive Effects of Combination Therapy in an Observational Study Using Marginal Structural Models

The evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of multiple antihypertensive drugs using data from an observational study requires adjustment for time‐dependent confounders. Marginal structural models (MSMs) have been proposed to address this type of confounding through inverse probability weighting. Generally, the probabilities are estimated using logistic regression models that assume linearity between the logistic link and the predictors, but the linearity might be inaccurate. In this article, we proposed MSMs to assess the blood pressure‐lowering effects of combination therapy with olmesartan medoxomil (OLM) plus calcium channel blockers (CCB) (OLM+CCB) in an observational study of OLM, and extended estimation methods of the probabilities for the MSMs using generalized additive models (GAMs). The estimation using GAMs was suggested to improve the balance of the distributions of confounder values between the therapy groups in the pseudo‐population. We obtained estimated changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) for OLM+CCB combination therapy after 12 wk compared with OLM monotherapy of ?4.3 mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI): ?7.7 and ?0.9 mmHg) and ?2.9 mmHg (95% CI: ?5.1 and ?0.7 mmHg), respectively. The estimated target BP (SBP<140 mmHg and DBP<90 mmHg) achievement rates for OLM+CCB combination therapy and OLM monotherapy were 62.0 and 46.7%, respectively. The results of the MSMs were closer to those in the randomized controlled trial, such as the combination of OLM and amlodipine besylate in controlling high blood pressure study, than those of conventional methods. The proposed MSMs provided useful information to evaluate the effects of combination therapy of antihypertensive drugs in the context of an observational study.     

The application of solid-state NMR spectroscopy to study candesartan cilexetil (TCV-116) membrane interactions. Comparative study with the AT1R antagonist drug olmesartan

ΑΤ1 receptor (AT1R) antagonists exert their antihypertensive effects by preventing the vasoconstrictive hormone AngII to bind to the AT1 receptor. It has been proposed that these biological effects are mediated through a two-step mechanism reaction. In the first step, they are incorporated in the core of the lipid bilayers and in the second step they reach the active site of the receptor through lateral diffusion. In this model, drug/membrane interactions are key elements for the drugs achieving inhibition at the AT1 receptor. In this work, the interactions of the prodrug candesartan cilexetil (TCV-116) with lipid bilayers are studied at molecular detail. Solid-state ¹³C-CP/MAS, 2D ¹H-¹H NOESY NMR spectroscopy and in silico calculations are used. TCV-116 and olmesartan, another drug which acts as an AT1R antagonist are compared for their dynamic effects in lipid bilayers using solid-state ²H-NMR. We find a similar localization of TCV-116 compared to other AT1 antagonists in the intermediate polar region. In addition, we can identify specific local interactions. These interactions may be associated in part with the discrete pharmacological profiles observed for different antagonists.