The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53

The E6 protein encoded by the oncogenic human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 is one of two viral products expressed in HPV-associated cancers. E6 is an oncoprotein which cooperates with E7 to immortalize primary human keratinocytes. Insight into the mechanism by which E6 functions in oncogenesis is provided by the observation that the E6 protein encoded by HPV-16 and HPV-18 can complex the wild-type p53 protein in vitro. Wild-type p53 gene has tumor suppressor properties, and is a target for several of the oncoproteins encoded by DNA tumor viruses. In this study we demonstrate that the E6 proteins of the oncogenic HPVs that bind p53 stimulate the degradation of p53. The E6-promoted degradation of p53 is ATP dependent and involves the ubiquitin-dependent protease system. Selective degradation of cellular proteins such as p53 with negative regulatory functions provides a novel mechanism of action for dominant-acting oncoproteins.     

Complex formation of human papillomavirus E7 proteins with the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene product.

The E7 proteins encoded by the human papillomaviruses (HPVs) associated with anogenital lesions share significant amino acid sequence homology. The E7 proteins of these different HPVs were assessed for their ability to form complexes with the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor gene product (p105-RB). Similar to the E7 protein of HPV-16, the E7 proteins of HPV-18, HBV-6b and HPV-11 were found to associate with p105-RB in vitro. The E7 proteins of HPV types associated with a high risk of malignant progression (HPV-16 and HPV-18) formed complexes with p105-RB with equal affinities. The E7 proteins encoded by HPV types 6b and 11, which are associated with clinical lesions with a lower risk for progression, bound to p105-RB with lower affinities. The E7 protein of the bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1), which does not share structural similarity in the amino terminal region with the HPV E7 proteins, was unable to form a detectable complex with p105-RB. The amino acid sequences of the HPV-16 E7 protein involved in complex formation with p105-RB in vitro have been mapped. Only a portion of the sequences that are conserved between the HPV E7 proteins and AdE1A were necessary for association with p105-RB. Furthermore, the HPV-16 E7-p105-RB complex was detected in an HPV-16-transformed human keratinocyte cell line.     

A cellular protein mediates association of p53 with the E6 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus types 16 or 18.

The E6 protein of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 (HPV-16 and HPV-18) can stably associate with the p53 protein in vitro. In the presence of rabbit reticulocyte lysate, this association leads to the specific degradation of p53 through the ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis system. We have examined the E6-p53 complex in more detail and have found that association of E6 with p53 is mediated by an additional cellular factor. This factor is present in rabbit reticulocyte lysate, primary human keratinocytes and in each of five human cell lines examined. The factor is designated E6-AP, for E6-associated protein, based on the observation that the E6 proteins of HPV-16 and 18 can form a stable complex with the factor in the absence of p53, whereas p53 association with the factor can be detected only in the presence of E6. Gel filtration and coprecipitation experiments indicate that E6-AP is a monomeric protein of approximately 100 kDa.     

Multiple Functions of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E6 Contribute to the Immortalization of Mammary Epithelial Cells

The E6 proteins from cervical cancer-associated human papillomavirus (HPV) types such as HPV type 16 (HPV-16) induce proteolysis of the p53 tumor suppressor protein through interaction with E6-AP. We have previously shown that human mammary epithelial cells (MECs) immortalized by HPV-16 E6 display low levels of p53. HPV-16 E6 as well as other cancer-related papillomavirus E6 proteins also binds the cellular protein E6BP (ERC-55). To explore the potential functional significance of these interactions, we created and analyzed a series of E6 mutants for their ability to interact with E6-AP, p53, and E6BP in vitro. While there was a similar pattern of binding among these E6 targets, a subset of mutants differentiated E6-AP binding, p53 binding, and p53 degradation activities. These results demonstrated that E6 binding to E6-AP is not sufficient for binding to p53 and that E6 binding to p53 is not sufficient for inducing p53 degradation. The in vivo activity of these HPV-16 E6 mutants was tested in MECs. In agreement with the in vitro results, most of these p53 degradation-defective E6 mutants were unable to reduce the p53 level in early-passage MECs. Interestingly, several mutants that showed severely reduced ability for interacting with E6-AP, p53, and E6BP in vitro efficiently immortalized MECs. These immortalized cells exhibited low p53 levels at late passage. Furthermore, mutants defective for p53 degradation but able to immortalize MECs were also identified, and the immortal cells retained normal levels of p53 protein. These results imply that multiple functions of HPV-16 E6 contribute to MEC immortalization.     

Interaction of the human papillomavirus type 16 E6 oncoprotein with wild-type and mutant human p53 proteins.

The E6 oncoproteins encoded by the cancer-associated human papillomaviruses (HPVs) can associate with and promote the degradation of wild-type p53 in vitro. To gain further insight into this process, the ability of HPV-16 E6 to complex with and promote the degradation of mutant forms of p53 was studied. A correlation between binding and the targeted degradation of p53 was established. Mutant p53 proteins that bound HPV-16 E6 were targeted for degradation, whereas those that did not complex HPV-16 E6 were not degraded. Since the HPV-16 E6-promoted degradation involves the ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis pathway, specific mutations were made in the amino terminus of p53 to examine whether the E6 targeted degradation involved the N-end rule pathway. No requirement for destabilizing amino acids at the N terminus of p53 was found, nor was evidence found that HPV-16 E6 could provide this determinant in trans, indicating that the N-terminal rule pathway is not involved in the E6-promoted degradation of p53.     

The ability of human papillomavirus E6 proteins to target p53 for degradation in vivo correlates with their ability to abrogate actinomycin D-induced growth arrest.

Functional p53 protein is associated with the ability of cells to arrest in G1 after DNA damage. The E6 protein of cancer-associated human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) binds to p53 and targets its degradation through the ubiquitin pathway. To determine whether the ability of E6 to interact with p53 leads to a disruption of cell cycle control, mutated E6 proteins were tested for p53 binding and p53 degradation targeting in vitro, the ability to reduce intracellular p53 levels in vivo, and the ability to abrogate actinomycin D-induced growth arrest in human keratinocytes. Mutations scattered throughout the amino terminus, either zinc finger or the central region but not the carboxy terminus, severely reduced the ability of E6 to interact with p53. Expression of HPV-16 E6 or mutated E6 proteins that bound and targeted p53 for degradation in vitro sharply reduced the level of intracellular p53 induced by actinomycin D in human keratinocytes. A perfect correlation between the ability of E6 proteins to reduce the level of intracellular p53 and their ability to block actinomycin D-induced cellular growth arrest was observed. These results suggest that interaction with p53 is important for the ability of HPV E6 proteins to circumvent growth arrest.     

Natural variants of the human papillomavirus type 16 E6 protein differ in their abilities to alter keratinocyte differentiation and to induce p53 degradation.

Three naturally occurring variant human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) E6 proteins, which contained amino acid substitutions predominantly near the N terminus, exhibited significant differences in their abilities to abrogate keratinocyte differentiation in response to serum and calcium and to induce the degradation of p53 in vitro. One variant surpassed the reference E6 protein in its ability to abrogate keratinocyte differentiation responses, whereas another showed a reduction in this activity. Interestingly, the biological activities of the HPV-16 E6 proteins and their abilities to induce p53 degradation in vitro were directly correlated. These results demonstrate that naturally occurring variants of HPV-16 differ in biological and biochemical properties which might result in differences in pathogenicity.