Antifungal Dosing in Critically Ill Patients

This article reviews appropriate dosing for antifungals and emphasizes factors specific to the critically ill patient, along with drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The rationale for doses of the echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin), triazoles (fluconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, posaconazole), amphotericin B (including lipid formulations), and flucytosine are discussed.     

289株VVC致病菌的菌种分布和对9种抗真菌药物敏感性

外阴阴道念珠菌病（vulvovaginal candidiasis,VVC）是女性的常见病。本研究收集了2018年1月-12月苏州地区VVC患者分离的289株念珠菌进行了病原学鉴定和包括棘白菌素类、新三唑类药物在内的9种抗真菌药物体外敏感性分析。本文采用核糖体RNA的D1/D2基因进行念珠菌菌种鉴定。参照M27-A3方法检测其对9种抗真菌药物（包括棘白菌素类及新三唑类药物）的体外敏感性。结果表明,289株VVC念珠菌菌株中,白念珠菌259株、光滑念珠菌14株、克柔念珠菌10株、热带念珠菌4株、近平滑念珠菌2株。259株VVC白念珠菌对棘白菌素类体外敏感性好,对米卡芬净敏感性高于另外两种棘白菌素类;对两性霉素B、5-氟胞嘧啶、氟康唑敏感性好;但对伊曲康唑、伏立康唑敏感性差;对泊沙康唑敏感性好。光滑念珠菌株和克柔念珠菌分离株对卡泊芬净敏感性差,但对米卡芬净、阿尼芬净敏感性好;光滑念珠菌株对两性霉素B、5-氟胞嘧啶体外敏感性好,对伊曲康唑敏感性差,对泊沙康唑敏感性好;伏立康唑对光滑念珠菌分离株MIC₅₀/₉₀为0.5/1μg/mL;克柔念珠菌对伊曲康唑、伏立康唑50%耐药;4株热带念珠菌对伊曲康唑50%耐药,对卡泊芬净、氟康唑、伏立康唑100%耐药,对其余5种抗真菌药物敏感。近平滑念珠菌对9种抗真菌药物均敏感。白念珠菌仍为苏州地区VVC的主要病原菌,其次是光滑念珠菌和克柔念珠菌,它们对临床常用药物伊曲康唑、伏立康唑、卡泊芬净敏感性差。研究结果提示对VVC病人常规进行分泌物培养、菌种鉴定,对苏州地区临床医生制定VVC治疗方案具有重要参考价值。尽管棘白菌素类、两性霉素B、5-氟胞嘧啶、新三唑类药物尚未应用到VVC的临床治疗中,但是这些药物对VVC病原体总体敏感性较好,未来有望成为氟康唑、咪唑类药物治疗失败患者的新选择。     

Comparative Pathogenicity of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Lomentospora prolificans</Emphasis> (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Scedosporium prolificans</Emphasis>) Isolates from Mexican Patients

We identified 11 Lomentospora prolificans isolates recovered from Mexican patients using phenotypic and molecular characteristics. The identification of isolates was assessed by internal transcribed spacer (ITS rDNA) sequencing. In vitro susceptibility to amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, caspofungin, anidulafungin and micafungin was determined according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) procedures. Three isolates (07-2239, 11-2242 and 04-2673) were used to induce systemic infection in immunocompetent ICR mice. Survival and tissue burden studies were used as markers of pathogenicity. All of the strains were resistant to every antifungal tested with MIC’s for AmB (8–>8 µg/ml), VRC (16–>16 µg/ml), PSC (16–>16 µg/ml), FLC (64–>64 µg/ml) and echinocandins with MICs ≥8 µg/ml. One hundred, ninety and sixty percent of the infected mice with the strains 07-2239, 11-2242 and 04-2673 died during the study, respectively. Regarding tissue burden, the highest fungal load of the infected mice was detected in brain followed by spleen and kidney, regardless of the strain.     

Effect of antifungals on itraconazole resistant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida glabrata</Emphasis>

In the last decade, infections caused by Candida glabrata have become more serious, particularly due to its decreased susceptibility to azole derivatives and its ability to form biofilm. Here we studied the resistance profile of 42 C. glabrata clinical isolates to different azoles, amphotericin B and echinocandins. This work was also focused on the ability to form biofilm which plays a role in the development of antifungal resistance. The minimal inhibitory concentration testing to antifungal agents was performed according to the CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) M27-A3 protocol. Quantification of biofilm was done by XTT reduction assay. All C. glabrata clinical isolates were resistant to itraconazole and sixteen also showed resistance to fluconazole. All isolates remained susceptible to voriconazole. Amphotericin B was efficient in a concentration range of 0.125–1 mg/L. The most effective antifungal agents were micafungin and caspofungin with the MIC₁₀₀ values of ≤0.0313–0.125 mg/L. Low concentrations of these agents reduced biofilm formation as well. Our results show that resistance of different C. glabrata strains is azole specific and therefore a single azole resistance cannot be assumed to indicate general azole resistance. Echinocandins proved to have very high efficacy against clinical C. glabrata strains including those with ability to form biofilm.     

In vitro antifungal activities of anidulafungin and micafungin, licensed agents and the investigational triazole posaconazole as determined by NCCLS methods for 12,052 fungal isolates: review of the literature

The echinocandins anidulafungin and micafungin and the triazole posaconazole are currently undergoing phase III clinical trials. Caspofungin and voriconazole have recently been licensed for the treatment of aspergillosis (both agents), other less common mould (voriconazole) and candidal (caspofungin) infections. This review summarizes the published in vitro data obtained by NCCLS or NCCLS modified methods on the in vitro fungistatic and fungicidal activities of these five agents for yeasts and moulds in comparison to the established agents, amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, and flucytosine. Among the yeasts, the echinocandins have less activity for Candida parapsilosis and Candida guilliermondii, no activity for Cryptococcus neoformans and Trichosporon spp., but good fungistatic and fungicidal activity in vivo and in vitro for most of the other Candida spp.; this fungicidal activity has been reported by minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) or time kill curve results. The new triazoles exhibit good fungistatic activity (but not fungicidal) for most Candida spp., C. neoformans, and Trichosporon spp. For the Aspergillus spp. evaluated, the echinocandins have similar or better fungistatic activity than those of amphotericin B and the triazoles, but fungicidal activity has been demonstrated only with amphotericin B and the triazoles, with the exception of fluconazole. Most studies showed posaconazole and voriconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 0.25 to 8 microg/ml for non-solani Fusarium spp., while MIC and minimum effective concentration (MEC) endpoints of the echinocandins were >8 microg/ml. The fungistatic activity of the triazoles is also superior to that of the echinocandins for most of the dimorphic fungi and the Zygomycetes. However, micafungin has activity for the mould phase of most dimorphic fungi, but not for the parasitic or yeast phase of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. The echinocandins appear to have variable and species dependent fungistatic activity for the dematiaceous fungi, but all agents have poor or no activity against most isolates of Scedosporium prolificans. Only amphotericin B exhibit good fungistatic activity against the Zygomycetes. The combination of caspofungin with some triazoles, amphotericin B or liposomal amphotericin B has been synergistic in vitro, in animal models and in patients. Breakpoints are not available for any mould and antifungal agent combination. In vitro/in vivo correlations should aid in the interpretation of these results, but standard testing conditions are needed for the echinocandins, especially for mould testing, to obtain reliable results.     

A Fatal Case of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida auris</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida tropicalis</Emphasis> Candidemia in Neutropenic Patient

We report a fatal case of Candida auris that was involved in mixed candidemia with Candida tropicalis, isolated from the blood of a neutropenic patient. Identification of both isolates was confirmed by amplification and sequencing of internal transcribed spacer and D1/D2 domain of large subunit in rRNA gene. Antifungal susceptibility test by E-test method revealed that C. auris was resistant to amphotericin B, anidulafungin, caspofungin, fluconazole, itraconazole and voriconazole. On the other hand, C. tropicalis was sensitive to all antifungal tested. The use of chromogenic agar as isolation media is vital in detecting mixed candidemia.     

Enfermedad fúngica invasora por hongos filamentosos en pacientes hematológicos

Invasive mould infections (IMI) are a persistent problem with high morbidity and mortality rates among patients receiving chemotherapy for hematological malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Management of IMI in this setting has become increasingly complex with the advent of new antifungal agents and diagnostic tests, which have resulted in different therapeutic strategies (prophylactic, empirical, pre-emptive, and directed). A proper assessment of the individual risk for IMI appears to be critical in order to use the best prophylactic and therapeutic approach and increase the survival rates. Among the available antifungal drugs, the most frequently used in the hematologic patient are fluconazole, mould-active azoles (itraconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole), candins (anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin), and lipid formulations of amphotericin B. Specific recommendations for their use, and criteria for selecting the antifungal agents are discussed in this paper.     

Genetic Diversity and Antifungal Susceptibility of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida parapsilosis</Emphasis> Sensu Stricto Isolated from Bloodstream Infections in Turkish Patients

Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto is an emerging cause of hospital-acquired Candida infections, predominantly in southern Europe, South America, and Asia. We investigated the genetic diversity and antifungal susceptibility profile of 170 independent C. parapsilosis sensu stricto strains obtained from patients with candidemia who were treated at the Ege University Hospital in Izmir, Turkey, between 2006 and 2014. The identity of each strain was confirmed via PCR amplification and digestion of the secondary alcohol dehydrogenase-encoding gene. The 24-h geometric mean minimum inhibitory concentrations of the antifungal agents, in increasing order, were as follows: posaconazole, 0.10 µg/mL; voriconazole, 0.21 µg/mL; caspofungin, 0.38 µg/mL; amphotericin B, 0.61 µg/mL; anidulafungin, 0.68 µg/mL; and fluconazole, 2.95 µg/mL. Microsatellite genotyping of the isolates (using fluorescently labeled primers and a panel of four different short-nucleotide repeat fragments) identified 25, 17, 17, and 8 different allelic genotypes at the CP6, B5, CP4, and CP1 locus, respectively. Posaconazole, caspofungin, and amphotericin B showed the greatest in vitro activity of the tested systemic azole, echinocandin, and polyene agents, respectively, and the observed antifungal susceptibility of the isolates was shown to be independent of their isolation source. We obtained a combined discriminatory power of 0.99 with a total of 130 genotypes for 170 isolates tested. Finally, microsatellite profiling analysis confirmed the presence of identical genotype between separate isolates, supporting that effective surveillance and infection-prevention programs are essential to limit the impact of C. parapsilosis sensu stricto on hospitalized patients’ health.     

In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility of Oral <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida</Emphasis> Isolates from Patients Suffering from Caries and Chronic Periodontitis

Caries and chronic periodontitis are common oral diseases where a higher Candida colonization is reported. Antifungal agents could be adjuvant drugs for the therapy of both clinical conditions. The aim of the current study has been to evaluate the in vitro activities of conventional and new antifungal drugs against oral Candida isolates from patients suffering from caries and/or chronic periodontitis. In vitro activities of amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, miconazole, nystatin, posaconazole and voriconazole against 126 oral Candida isolates (75 Candida albicans, 18 Candida parapsilosis, 11 Candida dubliniensis, six Candida guilliermondii, five Candida lipolytica, five Candida glabrata, four Candida tropicalis and two Candida krusei) from 61 patients were tested by the CLSI M27-A3 method. Most antifungal drugs were highly active, and resistance was observed in less than 5% of tested isolates. Miconazole was the most active antifungal drug, being more than 98% of isolates susceptible. Fluconazole, itraconazole, and the new triazoles, posaconazole and voriconazole, were also very active. Miconazole, fluconazole and voriconazole have excellent in vitro activities against all Candida isolates and could represent suitable treatment for a hypothetically adjunctive therapy of caries and chronic periodontitis.     

Distribution and antifungal susceptibility of yeasts isolates from intensive care unit patients

Yeasts frequently colonize non-sterile sites in the body. The aim of the study was to determine distribution in clinical samples and antifungal susceptibility to five antifungals. From January 2013 through June 2015, 800 isolates were obtained from intensive care unit patients. Candida albicans (58.9%), Candida glabrata (20.4%), Candida krusei (8.6%), and Candida parapsilosis (3.6%) were the leading species. Majority of the C. albicans isolates were susceptible to the fluconazole. Elevated voriconazole minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were observed in isolates exhibiting high fluconazole MICs, most frequently in C. glabrata. Isolates with echinocandins MICs suggesting reduced susceptibility were only sporadic cases with the exception of Trichosporon spp. The amphotericin B MICs were slightly higher for some C. krusei.     

Micafungina en el tratamiento de la infección fúngica en modelos animales

BackgroundMicafungin is an echinocandin antifungal drug recently approved for the treatment of candidiasis. The possibility of its clinical use against other invasive mycoses, has aroused the interest of numerous investigators in evaluating its efficacy in different animal models.ObjectivesTo critically review the current data on the use of micafungin in the treatment of invasive mycoses in animal models.MethodsWe searched the PubMed/Medline data base (National Library of Medicine) from 2005 to 2008, both inclusive, on the use of micafungin in the experimental treatment of the fungal infection.Results and conclusionsSeven, of a total of 18 articles reviewed, were done in animal models of candidiasis and six in animal models of pulmonary or SNC aspergillosis. Similarly to the other echinocandins, caspofungin and anidulafungin, micafungin seems to exert a fungicidal activity against Candida albicans and Candida glabrata and a fungistatic activity against Aspergillus fumigatus. The paradoxical effect observed in lung tissue the experimental caspofungin treatment of aspergillosis has not been seen in the case of micafungin. The available data demonstrate a higher efficacy of micafungin versus fluconazole in the experimental treatment of C. albicans infections caused by strains susceptible in vitro to both drugs. To improve the efficacy of micafungin in the treatment of C. glabrata and A. fumigatus infections, several authors have tested different combined therapies, the combination of micafungin with amphotericin B being that showed the best results.     

Comparison Between Etest and Broth Microdilution Methods for Testing Itraconazole-Resistant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Aspergillus fumigatus</Emphasis> Susceptibility to Antifungal Combinations

The checkerboard broth microdilution assay (BMD) is the most frequently used method for the in vitro evaluation of drug combinations. However, its use to evaluate the effect of antifungal drugs on filamentous fungi is sometimes associated with endpoint-reading difficulties, and different degrees of interaction are assigned to the same drug combination. We evaluated combinations of the azoles, itraconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole, with the echinocandins, anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin, against 15 itraconazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus clinical strains via the checkerboard BMD and Etest assay. Readings after 24 and 48 h, considering the two reading endpoints, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum effective concentration (MEC), were performed for both methods. Our results showed that the correlation coefficients between the BMD and Etest methods were quite diverse to the drug combinations tested. The highest correlation coefficients of the Etest with the BMD assays (MEC and MIC reading) were the Etest-MIC reading at 24 h and the Etest-MEC reading at 48 h. Improvements in experimental conditions may increase the correlation between the two methods and ensure that Etest assay can be safely used in the evaluation of antifungal combinations against Aspergillus species.     

Emerging Resistance to Azoles and Echinocandins: Clinical Relevance and Laboratory Detection

Failure to respond to antifungal therapy could be due to in vitro resistance (intrinsic or developed during therapy) or clinical resistance. In vitro resistance is mostly due to genetic mutations (resistance mechanisms), and it is associated with high minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), minimal effective concentrations (MECs), and/or clinical failure. Clinical breakpoints (CBPs) and/or epidemiologic cutoff values (ECVs) are useful to detect the in vitro antifungal resistance when isolates are tested by standardized methods. ECVs are available from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for Candida spp. versus echinocandins (anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin) and triazoles (fluconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole). Lately, the CLSI has adjusted to species-specific CBPs for Candida spp. versus fluconazole, similar to those of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), and versus echinocandins. However, the available voriconazole EUCAST and CLSI CBPs differ. In the absence of CBPs, EUCAST and CLSI assigned ECVs for various Aspergillus spp. and triazoles. This article reviews emerging resistance, laboratory detection, and clinical relevance as reported in the literature in the past 3 to 4 years.     

In Vitro Susceptibility of Candida Isolates from Organ Transplant Recipients to Newer Antifungals

Organ transplant recipients (OTR) are at higher risk of developing life-threatening infections. In this study, we tested 527 Candida isolates obtained from the oral and genital mucosa from OTR and healthy controls in order to monitor antifungal susceptibility patterns in this particular risk group. Testing was carried out in parallel for already marketed azoles and anidulafungin. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the E-test^® for azoles and CLSI broth microdilution for anidulafungin. Overall, there was no difference in the distribution of Candida spp. for both groups, C. albicans being the most frequently isolated Candida sp. followed by C. glabrata. Also, there were only minor differences in the susceptibility patterns to all antifungal agents. All C. albicans isolates were fully susceptible to fluconazole and voriconazole. In C. glabrata, 2.2 % (n = 1) were resistant to fluconazole, and 82.6 % (n = 38) to itraconazole, and in C. krusei, 66.7 % (n = 2) were resistant in itraconazole. All strains were susceptible to voriconazole. Only fluconazole showed a higher rate of resistant C. glabrata isolates for OTR (3.7 %), whereas the control group showed only intermediate susceptible and no resistant isolates. As there are no breakpoints established for posaconazole by CLSI, breakpoints determined by EUCAST were used. A total of 87.9 % of C. albicans, 81.3 % of C. parapsilosis and 66.7 % of C. tropicalis were considered susceptible. C. glabrata and C. krusei showed higher MIC values and thus lesser susceptibility than the other Candida species. There were no differences observed between OTR and control groups. For anidulafungin, 99.8 % of C. albicans isolates were susceptible, 0.2 % were intermediate, whereas for C. glabrata, only 95.3 % were susceptible, 0.2 % were resistant and 4.5 % were interpreted as intermediate. Interestingly, the two resistant isolates were found in the control group. Also, the controls showed a marginally higher percentage of intermediate strains compared to the transplant patients. All in all, resistant isolates were only observed for C. glabrata of the control group.     

Mechanisms of resistance to antifungal agents: yeasts and filamentous fungi

Failure to respond to antifungal therapy could be due to in vitro resistance (intrinsic or developed during therapy) or clinical resistance; the latter is associated with numerous factors related to the host, the antifungal agent, or the infecting isolate. Recently, a susceptible MIC breakpoint ( < or =2 microg/ml) was designed for Candida spp. to all three available echinocandins, anidulafungin (Pfizer), caspofungin (Merck) and micafungin (Astellas) and treatment failures have been associated with MICs > 2 microg/ml. In some of these cases, clinical failure was associated with the genetic mutations described below. Azole and flucytosine breakpoints, and the echinocandin susceptible breakpoint, are useful when isolates are tested by CLSI standardized methods; breakpoints are also available by the EUCAST method. More recently, in vitro resistant MIC breakpoints have been assigned for filamentous fungi (moulds) vs. five antifungal agents, but these categories are not based on correlations of in vitro with in vivo response to therapy. However, itraconazole (Janssen), amphotericin B (Bristol-Myers) and voriconazole (Pfizer) clinical failures in aspergillosis have been correlated with MICs > 2 microg/ml. This article provides a review of reported resistance molecular mechanisms to antifungal agents since 2005; previous related reviews are also listed.     

Correlation between broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of caspofungin, voriconazole, amphotericin B, itraconazole and fluconazole against Candida glabrata

Candida glabrata is one of the most frequent organisms isolated from superficial and invasive fungal infections, after Candida albicans. This organism also exhibits intrinsically low susceptibility to azole antifungals and treatment often fails. The microdilution method is not very practical for use in routine susceptibility testing in the clinical laboratory, thus necessitating the use of other methods. In this study, we compared the in vitro activity of five antifungal agents in three different groups (echinocandin, polyene and azole) against 50 C. glabrata isolates by broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods recommended by Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI M27-A3 and CLSI M44-A, respectively. All the isolates were susceptible to amphotericin B (100%) and 98% of the isolates were susceptible to caspofungin by the broth microdilution method. Within the azole group drugs, voriconazole was the most active followed by fluconazole and itraconazole in vitro. The highest rate of resistance was obtained against itraconazole with a high number of isolates defined as susceptible-dose dependent or resistant. Although the disk diffusion method is easy to use in clinical laboratories, it shows very poor agreement with the reference method for fluconazole and itraconazole against C. glabrata (8% and 14%, respectively).     

First report of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida bracarensis</Emphasis> in Mexico: hydrolytic enzymes and antifungal susceptibility pattern

Candida bracarensis is an emerging cryptic species within the Candida glabrata clade. To date, little is known about its epidemiology, virulence, and antifungal susceptibility. This study documents the occurrence of C. bracarensis for the first time in Mexico and focuses on its in vitro production of hydrolytic enzymes, as well as antifungal susceptibility to echinocandins. This strain was isolated from a vaginal swab of a female with vulvovaginal candidosis; exhibited a very strong activity of aspartyl proteinase, phospholipase, and hemolysin; and was susceptible to caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin (MIC?=?0.031 μg/mL). Data obtained could contribute to the knowledge of the epidemiology and virulence attributes of this yeast as a fungal opportunistic human pathogen.     

Evaluation of Etest Performed in Mueller–Hinton Agar Supplemented with Glucose for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Isolates of Filamentous Fungi

Although reference broth microdilution protocol is currently available for filamentous fungi antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST), simpler alternatives as Etest^® tend to be favoured in clinical routine, making their validation of utmost importance. In this study, Etest^® method using 2 % glucose supplemented Muller–Hinton agar was compared to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M38-A2 protocol for filamentous fungi AFST. The echinocandins, caspofungin and anidulafungin, the azoles voriconazole and posaconazole, and the polyene amphotericin B were tested against 48 Aspergillus spp., seven Fusarium spp., one Beauveria bassiana and three Paecilomyces lilacinus isolates. The majority of the isolates were susceptible to the antifungals tested, and the overall level of agreement between the CLSI and Etest methods was 71.9 % for one dilution and 99.7 % when using two dilutions. Since interpretative breakpoints for filamentous fungi employing the CLSI or Etest methods are not available yet, the established epidemiological cut-off values for Aspergillus spp. were used to distinguish wild-type isolates from those with acquired resistance mechanisms. Forty-five Aspergillus strains did not evidence resistance mutations.     

Antifungal Activity of Antifungal Drugs,as Well as Drug Combinations Against <Emphasis Type="Italic">Exophiala dermatitidis</Emphasis>

To evaluate the in vitro efficacy of common antifungal drugs, as well as the interactions of caspofungin with voriconazole, amphotericin B, or itraconazole against the pathogenic black yeast Exophiala dermatitidis from China, the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of terbinafine, voriconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B, fluconazole, and caspofungin against 16 strains of E. dermatitidis were determined by using CLSI broth microdilution method (M38-A2). The minimal fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) were also determined. Additionally, the interactions of caspofungin with voriconazole, amphotericin B, itraconazole or fluconazole, that of terbinafine with itraconazole, or that of fluconazole with amphotericin B were assessed by using the checkerboard technique. The fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was used to categorize drug interactions as following, synergy, FICI ≤ 0.5; indifference, FICI > 0.5 and ≤4.0; or antagonism, FICI > 4.0. The MIC ranges of terbinafine, voriconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B, fluconazole, and caspofungin against E. dermatitidis were 0.06–0.125 mg/l, 0.25–1.0 mg/l, 1.0–2.0 mg/l, 1.0–2.0 mg/l, 16–64 mg/l, and 32–64 mg/l, respectively. The in vitro interactions of caspofungin with voriconazole, amphotericin B, and itraconazole showed synergic effect against 10/16(62.5%), 15/16(93.75%), and 16/16(100%) isolates, while that of caspofungin with fluconazole showed indifference. Besides, the interaction of terbinafine with itraconazole as well as that of fluconazole with amphotericin B showed indifference. Terbinafine, voriconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B have good activity against E. dermatitidis. The combinations of caspofungin with voriconazole, amphotericin B or itraconazole present synergic activity against E. dermatitidis. These results provide the basis for novel options in treating various E. dermatitidis infections.     

Veronaea botryosa: Molecular Identification with Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) and In vitro Antifungal Susceptibility

Inter- and intraspecific genomic variability of 18 isolates of Veronaea botryosa originating from clinical and environmental sources was studied using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). The species was originally described from the environment, but several severe cases of disseminated infection in apparently healthy individuals have been reported worldwide. All tested strains of V. botryosa, identified on the basis of sequencing and phenotypic and physiological criteria prior to our study, were confirmed by AFLP analysis, yielding a clear separation of V. botryosa as a rather homogeneous group from related species. In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing resulted in MIC₉₀s across all strains in increasing order posaconazole (0.25 μg/ml), itraconazole (1 μg/ml), voriconazole (4 μg/ml), terbinafine (4 μg/ml), caspofungin (8 μg/ml), anidulafungin (8 μg/ml), isavuconazole (16 μg/ml), amphotericin B (16 μg/ml), and fluconazole (32 μg/ml). Overall, the isolates showed a uniform pattern of low MICs of itraconazole and posaconazole, but high MICs for remaining agents. The echinocandins (caspofungin and anidulafungin) had no activity against V. botryosa. There was no statistically significant difference between susceptibilities of environmental (n = 11) and clinical (n = 7) isolates of V. botryosa (P > 0.05).