Foraging behaviour of Nuthatches(Sitta europaea) in relation to the presence of mates and mixed flocks

Summary Nuthatches (Sitta europaea) usually forage in pairs outside the breeding season. I investigated whether foraging site selection in winter (tree species, height, substrate size) differed between sexes and whether this difference was related to the presence of mixed-species flocks. Foraging sites of pair members foraging together were highly correlated. In the rare cases when each used different tree species, males foraged significantly more often on the preferred oak trees than females. Males foraged significantly lower than females in some territories, but not in others. The reasons for this significant variation between pairs remains unexplained. Males also foraged lower than females in the company of mixed flocks. These differences are probably better explained as avoidance of the dominant male by the subordinate female, rather than specialization in resource use to avoid competition.

---

Nahrungssuche beim Kleiber (Sitta europaea) im Paarverbund und in gemischten Schwärmen

Zusammenfassung Außerhalb der Brutzeit fouragieren Kleiber gewöhnlich in Paaren. Ich untersuchte, ob sich die Geschlechter in der Wahl des winterlichen Nahrungsortes (Baumart, Höhe, Astdicke) unterscheiden und ob solche Unterschiede durch die Anwesenheit von gemischten Schwärmen beeinflußt ist. Die Ortswahl der gemeinschaftlich auf Nahrungssuche gehenden Paarpartner war hoch korreliert. In den seltenen Fällen, in denen sich die Partner an verschiedenen Bäumen aufhielten, fanden sich die Männchen signifikant mehr an den der Art bevorzugten Eichen als die Weibchen. In einigen Revieren fouragierten die Männchen an signifikant niedrigeren Standorten als die Weibchen, doch war dies nicht in allen Revieren der Fall. Die Ursachen für diese Unterschiede sind nicht bekannt. Auch in gemischten Schwärmen erfolgte die Nahrungssuche der Männchen niedriger als die der Weibchen. Möglicherweise vermeiden die Weibchen so die Konkurrenz durch die dominanten Männchen.

     

Dominance and feeding competition in captive rhesus monkeys

The feeding behavior of 16 adult female rhesus monkeys living in three captive social groups was observed. Estimates of relative food intake, feeding rate, and location of feeding in relation to food sources were compared between females of different dominance ranks. Higher-ranking females had greater access to feeding sites and were supplanted or threatened less frequently while feeding than subordinates. However, no consistent differences in estimates of total intake were found between females of high and females of low rank. The effects of dominance on feeding behavior were most pronounced in the group receiving the least food relative to estimates of overall group nutritional requirements. Higher-ranking females, both over the long term and during the study period, tended to produce more surviving offspring. The effects of dominance on reproductive performance appeared to be less related to food intake than to competitive and aggressive interactions, potentially resulting in higher levels of stress for subordinates.     

Food Competition Between Wild Orangutans in Large Fig Trees

Orangutans are usually solitary. However, occasionally aggregations are formed, especially in large fruiting fig trees. Individuals in these aggregations may experience scramble or contest competition for food. We investigated the type and strength of food competition in large figs among wild Sumatran orangutans. Adult males foraged more efficiently than adult females and subadult males did. The availability of ripe fruit is positively related to the number of orangutans visiting a fig tree and their foraging efficiency. The number of orangutans in a fig tree did not affect patch residence time and foraging behavior, though orangutans spent more time feeding when aggregation size increased in a fig tree. Dominance relationships could be measured in a number of dyads. Differences in dominance did not affect foraging behavior. The patch residence time of subordinate individuals was reduced on days that a dominant individual also visited the fig. In conclusion, orangutans seem to adjust aggregation size to the number of available ripe fruits in a fig tree in such a way that scramble competition was absent. Contest competition determined access to large fig trees.     

Ecological dominance and the final sprint in hominid evolution

In contrast to many other models of human evolution the “balance of power” theory of Alexander has a clear answer to the question why a runaway selection process for unique social and moral capacities occurred in our ancestry only and not in other species: “ecological dominance” is hypothesized to have diminished the effects of “extrinsic” forces of natural selection such that withinspecies, intergroup competition increased (Alexander, 1989). Alexander seems to be wrong, however, in his claim that already the common HUCHIBO (Humans, Chimps, Bonobo's)-ancestor has crossed the ecological dominance barrier. In this paper an adapted version of Alexander's model is presented and several different ways are proposed to make this adapted version testable. A preliminary survey of the available paleontological and paleoecological data suggests that there is some evidence of a less vulnerable position towards predators in earlyHomo and that there are clear signs related to a crossing of the ecological dominance barrier inHomo sapiens sapiens.     

Social competition or correlated strategy?

Summary Cooperation need not be expressed identically among individuals in a group to enhance the fitness of all. Complementary tasks can be allocated differentially, with task assignment differentially affecting individual absolute fitness. Such differential task assignment is often considered a consequence of social competition to avoid fitness-limiting tasks. I suggest an alternative, evoking an area of evolutionary game theory often overlooked in analyses of cooperation, where task assignment can be fundamentally arbitrary relative to competitive ability. Dominance, implied, ritual or actual, need not be a consequence of social competition for resources within groups.     

Importance of Body Size in Determining Dominance Hierarchies among Diverse Tropical Frugivores1

Most studies examining dominance hierarchies have focused at the intraspecific level. While some examples of interspecific hierarchies have been noted, these have usually been limited to a few species in the same taxonomic group that utilize resources in similar ways. Here, we examine evidence for dominance interference competition among vertebrates comprising a diverse frugivore community, including 19 species of birds, squirrels, and primates in a mature Central African rainforest. A total of 38 fruiting trees from 18 species were observed for 2058 h to record dominance interactions between foraging vertebrates. We show that interference competition occurs within and between taxonomically diverse species of vertebrates at fruiting trees. The resulting cross‐taxonomic dominance hierarchy includes larger vertebrates, such as primates and hornbills, as well as smaller ones, such as squirrels and parrots. Within this hierarchy, the dominance rank of each species is highly correlated with body mass, and is shown to significantly affect the number of fruits removed from a given tree. Because a majority of tropical tree species depend on vertebrates to disperse their seeds, and particular vertebrates may preferentially disperse the seeds of specific tree species, results may have important conservation implications for the maintenance of tree diversity in regions where populations of larger frugivores have been depressed or extirpated.     

基于Voronoi图的群落优势树种种内种间竞争

在浙江天目山国家级自然保护区内,选择典型常绿阔叶林设置样地,样地大小100m×100m。用全站仪测定每株树木坐标(x,y,z)。首先,用优势度分析法确定群落优势树种。其次,提出基于Voronoi图的V_Hegyi竞争指数,并对Hegyi、APA和V_Hegyi三种竞争指数进行比较分析。最后,采用V_Hegyi竞争指数分析常绿阔叶林的种内、种间竞争关系。结果表明:常绿阔叶林群落共有11个优势树种即细叶青冈(Cyclobalanopsis myrsinaefolia)、青冈(Cyclobalanopsis glauca)、短尾柯(Lithocarpus brevicau-datus)、豹皮樟(Litsea coreana)、白栎(Quercus fabri)、天目木姜子(Litsea auriculata)、黄连木(Pistacia chinensis)、榉树(Zelkovaschneideriana)、杉木(Cunninghamia lanceolata)、枫香(Liquidambar formosana)和黄檀(Dalbergia hupeana)。比较分析认为,V_Hegyi竞争指数既克服了用固定半径圆确定竞争单元的尺度不统一缺陷,又可进行种内、种间竞争分析,并保持竞争排序的稳定性,因此是优于Hegyi和APA的更合适的竞争指数,所以选择V_Hegyi竞争指数进行优势树种竞争分析。常绿阔叶林优势树种的种内竞争比种间竞争激烈。种内竞争最激烈的优势树种细叶青冈、青冈和短尾柯与其它优势树种的种间竞争强度也是最高的。反之,种内、种间竞争都较弱的优势树种包括豹皮樟、白栎、天目木姜子、黄连木、榉树、杉木、枫香和黄檀。多数优势树种存在1个主要竞争树种,很少有超过3个以上的情形。细叶青冈是群落最占优势的树种,具有最强烈的种内竞争。同时,也是所有其它优势树种的最大竞争者。     

Grooming Between Male Chimpanzees at Ngogo,Kibale National Park. II. Influence of Male Rank and Possible Competition for Partners

Allogrooming contributes to the development and maintenance of social relationships, including those that involve alliances, in many primate species. Variation in relatedness, dominance rank, and other factors can produce variation in the value of others as grooming partners. Several models have been developed to account for variation in the distribution of grooming in relation to dominance ranks. These start from the premise that individuals are attracted to high-ranking partners, but time limits, direct competition, and prior grooming engagement between high-ranking individuals can constrain access to them. Sambrook et al. (1995) formalized some of these models and showed the importance of taking group size variation into account when assessing them. Chimpanzees form multimale communities in which males are the philopatric sex. Males commonly associate and groom with each other; they also form dominance hierarchies and form alliances that influence dominance ranks and mating success. Both male rank and the rank distance between partners are significantly correlated with the distribution of grooming between males in an extremely large chimpanzee community at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda, that has more males than any other known community. High-ranking males had more grooming partners than mid- or low-ranking males. Grooming predominantly went up the dominance hierarchy, but was also concentrated among males that were close in rank. Rank and rank distance apparently both affected grooming independently of reciprocity in grooming and independently of the frequency with which males associated in temporary parties. However, the data do not clearly indicate how constraints on access to partners might have operated. Published data from a smaller chimpanzee community at Mahale show no rank or rank distance effect on male grooming. These results and earlier, conflicting findings on the association between dominance rank and grooming in male chimpanzees indicate that variation in group size, i.e., the number of males per community, probably influences the strength of any such effects, as happens for grooming between females in several cercopithecine species. Data on coalitions at Ngogo support the argument that high-ranking males are valuable social partners, and similarity in strategies of alliance formation may influence the distribution of grooming.     

Limited effects of dominant ants on assemblage species richness in three Amazon forests

1. Ants are highly interactive organisms and dominant species are considered to be able to control the species richness of other ants via competitive exclusion. However, depending on the scale studied, inter‐specific competition may or may not structure biological assemblages. To date, ant dominance–richness relationships have only been studied in small sample units, where a few dominant colonies could plausibly control most of the sample unit. 2. We conducted a comprehensive survey of terrestrial ant assemblages using bait, pitfall, and litter‐sorting methods in three sites in Brazilian Amazonia. Using a spatially structured rarefaction approach, based on sampling units with linear dimensions ranging from 25 to 250 m, the mesoscale patterns of ant dominance–richness relationships (sampling units covering hundreds of meters separated by kilometers) were investigated. 3. Interference–competition models (parabolic or negative linear relationships between species richness and the abundance of dominant ants) tended to be more frequent in smaller sample units or in assemblages sampled with interactive methods, such as baits. Using more inclusive sampling methods, the relationship was generally asymptotic rather than parabolic, with no reduction in species diversity because of the presence of dominants. Random co‐occurrence patterns of species within sites support the interpretation of a limited role for present‐day competition in structuring these assemblages. 4. Competition from dominant species may reduce species richness in small areas, especially when artificial baits are used, but appears to be less important than environmental constraints in determining ant species richness across scales of hectares and greater in these Amazon forests.