Developments in multiple headspace extraction

This paper reviews new developments in multiple headspace extraction (MHE), especially its combination with two miniaturized extraction techniques, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and single-drop microextraction (SDME). The combination of the techniques broadens the applicability of SPME and SDME to quantitative determination of analytes in complex liquid and solid matrixes. These new methods offer several advantages over traditional liquid-solid, liquid-liquid and headspace extraction techniques. The potential applications include extraction of volatiles and semivolatiles from environmental and physiological samples and from different polymer products such as medical and biomedical materials, food packaging and building materials. The theoretical principals of the techniques are also briefly reviewed.     

Supercritical fluid extraction of steroids from biological samples and first experience with solid-phase microextraction-liquid chromatography

Modern extraction techniques, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) were used for isolation of four corticosteroids from biological matrices. SFE was applied for extraction from solid matrices--hydromatrix and pig muscle. The effects of various extraction conditions were studied. Good recoveries of corticosteroids from hydromatrix were obtained under moderate extraction conditions and without modification of carbon dioxide. On the contrary, the best recoveries from spiked pig muscle were obtained with modified carbon dioxide. SPME was used for extraction from liquid samples--water and urine. The eventuality of the use of this fast solvent-free technique in steroid analysis is demonstrated. Several extraction conditions were optimized. Extracted steroids were analyzed by HPLC-UV and a special SPME-HPLC interface was used for combination with SPME.     

Bioorganic Research of Galactites tomentosa Moench. Honey Extracts: Enantiomeric Purity of Chiral Marker 3‐Phenyllactic Acid

Thistle (Galactites tomentosa Moench.) honey organic extracts were obtained by headspace solid‐phase microextraction (HS‐SPME) and ultrasonic solvent extraction (USE) and analyzed by gas chromatography (GC‐FID and GC‐MS) for the first time. Most abundant headspace compounds were terpenes, particularly linalool derivatives (hotrienol was predominant with a range of 38.6–57.5%). 3‐Phenyllactic acid dominated in the solvent extracts (77.4–86.4%) followed by minor percentages of other shikimate pathway derivatives. After determination of an adequate enantioseparation protocol on Chirallica PST‐4 column, the honey solvent extracts were analyzed by high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The chiral analysis revealed high enantiomeric excess (>95%) of (–)‐3‐phenyllactic acid in all samples. Therefore, previous findings of chemical markers of thistle honey were extended, providing new potential for advanced chemical fingerprinting (optical pure chemical marker). Chirality 26:405–410, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Analysis of biological samples using solid-phase microextraction

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has gained widespread acceptance for analyte-matrix separation and preconcentration. SPME is a simple, effective adsorption/desorption technique that eliminates the need for solvents or complicated apparatus for concentrating volatile or non-volatile compounds in liquid samples or headspace. SPME is compatible with analyte separation/detection by gas chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography and provides linear results for a wide range of concentrations of analytes. By controlling the polarity and thickness of the coating on the fiber, maintaining consistent sampling time, and adjusting several other extraction parameters, an analyst can ensure highly reliable results for low concentrations of analytes. This review provides updated information on SPME with chromatographic separation for the extraction and measurement of different analytes in biological fluids and materials. Firstly the background to the technique is given in terms of apparatus, fibers used, extraction conditions and derivatisation procedures. Then the different matrices, urine, blood, breast milk, hair and saliva are considered separately. Finally, the future potential of SPME for the analysis of biological samples in terms of the development of new devices and fiber chemistries as well as applications for in vivo studies are discussed.     

挥发性有机化合物（VOCs）采样方法的研究进展

对近年来国内外挥发性有机化合物（VOCs）采集方法的研究进展进行了综合和概括。对VOCs几种主要的采样方法包括顶空收集法、液液萃取法、超临界流体萃取、吸附剂收集法、吹扫捕集法、画相微萃取等技术进行了阐述和比较,提出应根据实验材料的特性选择合适的采样方法,旨在为应用VOCs的采集方法及相关研究提供参考和借鉴。     

Determination of acrolein by headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography and mass spectrometry

We developed a headspace solid-phase microextraction (headspace SPME) method to measure acrolein in human urine. This new technique resolves some problems with the headspace gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC–MS) method which we developed previously. With the original method, a column and a filament were damaged by the injection of air. A 0.5-ml urine (or phosphate-buffered saline) sample in a glass vial containing propionaldehyde as an internal standard was heated for 5 min. The SPME fiber (65 μm carbonwax–divinylbenzene fiber) was exposed to the headspace and then inserted into a GC–MS instrument in which a DB-WAX capillary column (30 m×0.32 mm, film thickness 0.5 μm) was installed. The total analysis time was 15 min. The inter-assay and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 10.07 and 5.79%, respectively. The calibration curve demonstrated good linearity throughout concentrations ranging from 1 to 10 000 nM. The headspace SPME method exhibits high sensitivity and requires a short analysis time as well as the previous method. We conclude that this method is useful to measure urinary acrolein.     

Determination of methanol in biodiesel by headspace solid phase microextraction

A new direct gas chromatography procedure (headspace solid phase microextraction) was developed for the quantitative determination of methanol in biodiesel. The analysis was performed by exposing a carboxen–polydimethylsiloxane SPME fiber assembly to the headspace of the biodiesel sample. The gas chromatography used a HP-5 capillary column and flame ionization detection. A polynomial relationship was observed between the methanol concentration and its peak area. This method showed good reproducibility (average relative standard deviation 7.06%) and recovery (average recovery 100.2%).     

Study of ligand-receptor binding using SPME: investigation of receptor, free, and total ligand concentrations

The theoretical background and practical approaches for studying ligand-receptor (protein) binding by solid phase microextraction (SPME) are investigated, along with methods for simultaneous calculation of receptor, free, and total ligand concentrations. With the introduction of new extraction phases (restricted access materials, molecularly imprinted polymers, and immobilized antibodies), SPME allows better separation of small molecules of ligand from larger molecules of receptor, and improved accuracy. This sample preparation method based on nonexhaustive extraction is well suited as a general method to study and quantify systems involving multiple equilibriums, with significant advantages over currently used methods. SPME was used previously for the determination of protein binding constants, but only with conventional extraction phases and in simple cases, with a 1:1 combination ratio between the ligand and the receptor or when negligible depletion conditions were met. The new theoretical approach presented in this study allows the quantification of any binding equilibrium, regardless of the extent of depletion. Restricted-access particles are used as extraction phase, and if the amount of receptor is limited, selected regions of the binding curve may be obtained using a single sample, with a volume as low as 10 muL. The equations developed here are simple and independent of the analytical method used for the quantification of the amount of ligand. Three different practical approaches are presented: the method of multiple standard solutions, the method of successive extractions from the same sample and the method of successive additions to the same sample. The usefulness of this novel approach is demonstrated by using it to determine the binding parameters of some selected drugs to human serum albumin. These parameters are subsequently used to calculate albumin, free drug, and total drug concentrations from unknown mixtures. The results are in good agreement with previously published data. Quantification of the amount of ligand extracted by SPME is done by liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry.     

In vivo sampling with solid phase microextraction

This review discusses the most recent developments and future challenges in the application of solid phase microextraction (SPME) for sampling of live biological samples. The emphasis is placed on applications of fiber SPME for analysis of volatile emissions and drugs in biological fluids. The method development section highlights the main parameters that need to be considered in the case of in vivo experiments: extraction techniques, selection of extraction phases, calibration procedures, determination of free concentrations, and automation.     

Single step determination of PCB 126 and 153 in rat tissues by using solid phase microextraction/gas chromatography–mass spectrometry: Comparison with solid phase extraction and liquid/liquid extraction

A simple and reliable solid phase microextraction/gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (SPME/GC–MS) method was developed for the single-step determination of PCBs 126 and 153 in rat brain and serum, using liquid/liquid and solid phase extraction (SPE) as reference techniques. The multi-factor categorical experimental design used to study simultaneously the main parameters and their interactions affecting the efficiency of the method, showed that the use of an 85 μm PA exposed at 100 °C for 40 min was the optimum sampling condition for both PCBs. SPME was then validated by studying its linear dynamic (over two orders of magnitude), limits of detection (brain: 2 ng/g, serum: 0.2 ng/g) and analytical precision that was within 9% for SPME in both brain and serum. Finally, the method was used to determine the brain and blood target dose in mothers and pups after oral exposure of the mothers.     

Development of a solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography method to determine N-hydroxymethyl-N-methylformamide and N-methylformamide in urine

A headspace solid phase microextraction (SPME) method has been developed to determine metabolites of dimethylformamide, N-hydroxymethyl-N-methylformamide, and N-methylformamide (NMF) as NMF in urine by gas chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detector (GC-NPD). An SPME holder with a 65-microm PDMS/DVB fiber coating was used. Optimal desorption conditions were 250 degrees C for 1 min, adsorption at 80 degrees C for 15 min, and 3.00 mL of sample in the headspace vial. The method presented good resolution, repeatability, recovery, detection limit, ruggedness and response linearity.     

In vivo sampling with solid phase microextraction

This review discusses the most recent developments and future challenges in the application of solid phase microextraction (SPME) for sampling of live biological samples. The emphasis is placed on applications of fiber SPME for analysis of volatile emissions and drugs in biological fluids. The method development section highlights the main parameters that need to be considered in the case of in vivo experiments: extraction techniques, selection of extraction phases, calibration procedures, determination of free concentrations, and automation.     

Solid-phase microextraction gas chromatographic–mass spectrometric method for the determination of inhalation anesthetics in urine

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has been applied to the headspace sampling of inhalation anesthetics (i.e. nitrous oxide, isoflurane and halothane) in human urine. Analysis was carried out by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry using a capillary column with a divinylbenzene porous polymeric stationary phase. A SPME divinylbenzene–Carboxen–polydimethylsiloxane coated fiber, 2 cm long, was used, and its performances were compared with those of a Carboxen–PDMS in terms of sensitivity, extraction efficiency, extraction time, fiber coating–urine distribution coefficient. For both fibers, linearity was established over four orders of magnitude, limits of detection were below 100 ng/l for nitrous oxide and below 30 ng/l for halogenated. Precision calculated as %RSD was within 3–13% for all intra- and inter-day determinations. The method was applied to the quantitative analysis of anesthetics in the urine of occupationally exposed people (operating room personnel).     

Determination of amphetamines in human urine by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is under investigation for its usefulness in the determination of a widening variety of volatile and semivolatile analytes in biological fluids and materials. Semivolatiles are increasingly under study as analytical targets, and difficulties with small partition coefficients and long equilibration times have been identified. Amphetamines were selected as semivolatiles exhibiting these limitations and methods to optimize their determination were investigated. A 100- micro m polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-coated SPME fiber was used for the extraction of the amphetamines from human urine. Amphetamine determination was made using gas chromatography (GC) with flame-ionization detection (FID). Temperature, time and salt saturation were optimized to obtain consistent extraction. A simple procedure for the analysis of amphetamine (AMP) and methamphetamine (MA) in urine was developed and another for 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-ethylamphetamine (MDEA) using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and GC-FID. Higher recoveries were obtained for amphetamine (19.5-47%) and methamphetamine (20-38.1%) than MDA (5.1-6.6%), MDMA (7-9.6%) and MDEA (5.4-9.6%).     

Comparison of terpene composition in Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii) using hydrodistillation, SPME and PLE

Terpenes emitted by conifer trees are generally determined by analysing plant extracts or essential oils, prepared from foliage and cones using steam distillation. The application of these procedures limits experiments to cut plant materials. Recently headspace techniques have been adopted to examine terpene emission by living plants. This paper deals with the application of solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) for the analysis of terpenes emitted by conifers foliage of Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii), including its seedlings. The compositions of SPME extracts obtained for destroyed and non-destroyed old and juvenile spruce needles were compared with the compositions of essential oils and pressurised liquid extraction (PLE) extracts corresponding to the same plant materials. No substantial differences have been found in the qualitative terpene composition estimated by analysing essential oil and PLE and SPME extracts from non-destroyed old and juvenile foliage. The disintegration of spruce needles results in the formation of a significant amount of myrcene in the case of the old conifer foliage and non-terpenoic compounds in the case of juvenile conifer foliage. This phenomenon can be attributed to enzymatic reactions occurring in the destroyed plant cells.     

采用多次顶空固相微萃取分析拟南芥绿叶挥发性物质

顶空固相微萃取作为一种新的挥发性和半挥发性物质分析技术,被广泛应用于植物样品的定性分析。由于进行顶空分析时,挥发性组分间的基质效应以及较为复杂的扩散和吸附过程,定量分析一直是SPME分析应用的难题。目标分析物的量看作是达到吸附平衡后单一萃取的物质量的总和,则无需考虑分析样品在顶空、萃取涂层间的分配,同时可以消除基质效应。在利用标准物质进行校正后只需要一次顶空萃取,即可求出分析物质的总量。首先利用DVB/CAR/PDMS定性得到拟南芥挥发性物质的组成,然后采用CAR/PDMS涂层定量,分析了拟南芥的3种绿叶挥发性物质,优化后萃取条件为40℃萃取20min,相对标准偏差小于12%,在3株植物样品中这些挥发性物质的量为78.6~158.4ng.g-1。     

Analysis of methanol or formic acid in body fluids by headspace solid-phase microextraction and capillary gas chromatography

Methanol and its metabolite formic acid have been found extractable from human whole blood and urine by headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with a Carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane fiber. The headspace SPME for formic acid was carried out after derivatization to methyl formate under acidic conditions. The determinations of both compounds were made by using acetonitrile as internal standard (IS) and capillary gas chromatography (GC) with flame ionization detection. The headspace SPME–GC gave sharp peaks for methanol, methyl formate and I.S.; and low background noises for whole blood and urine samples. Extraction efficiencies were 0.25–1.05% of methanol and 0.38–0.84% formic acid for whole blood and urine. The calibration curves for methanol and formic acid showed excellent linearity in the range of 1.56 to 800 and 1.56 to 500 μg/0.5 ml of whole blood or urine, respectively. The detection limits were 0.1–0.5 μg/0.5 ml for methanol and 0.6 μg/0.5 ml for formic acid for both body fluids. The within-day relative standard deviations in terms of extraction efficiency for both compounds in whole blood and urine samples were not greater than 9.8%. By using the established SPME method, methanol and formic acid were successfully separated and determined in rat blood after oral administration of methanol.     

Single hair analysis of methamphetamine and amphetamine by solid phase microextraction coupled with in matrix derivatization

A sensitive method for detection of methamphetamine (MA) and amphetamine (AP) in human hair was developed using solid phase microextraction (SPME) and one-pot derivatization. MA and AP were directly derivatized to N-propoxycarbonyl derivatives in an aqueous solution by propylchloroformate in a one-pot reaction before extraction by SPME. The derivatives were extracted to a coating of SPME from a headspace of the vial. The adsorbed derivatives were thermally desorbed in the injection port of a gas chromatograph. Pentadeuterated MA was used as an internal standard. The absolute recoveries of MA and AP from the spiked hair were 2.80-17.5%, respectively. The calibration curves showed linearity in the range of 0.05-20 ng/0.08 mg/vial for MA and 0.1-20 ng/0.08 mg/vial for AP in hair. Detection limits (S/N = 3) of MA and AP were 0.02 and 0.05 ng/0.08 mg/vial. The coefficients of variation of intraday were 1.04-26.4%. Additionally, this proposed method was applied to segmental analysis in clinical and medico-legal cases of MA intoxication.     

Current trends in solid-phase-based extraction techniques for the determination of pesticides in food and environment

Solid-phase extraction (SPE) procedures for pesticide residues in food and environment are reviewed and discussed. The use of these procedures, which include several approaches such as: matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD), solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) and stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), represents an opportunity to reduce analysis time, solvent consumption, and overall cost. SPE techniques differ from solvent extraction depending on the interactions between a sorbent and the pesticide. This interaction may be specific for a particular pesticide, as in the interaction with an immunosorbent, or non-specific, as in the way a number of different pesticides are adsorbed on apolar or polar materials. A variety of applications were classified according to the method applied: conventional SPE, SPME, hollow-fiber micro-extraction (HFME), MSPD and SBSE. Emphasis is placed on the multiresidue analysis of liquid and solid samples.     

Current trends in solid-phase-based extraction techniques for the determination of pesticides in food and environment

Solid-phase extraction (SPE) procedures for pesticide residues in food and environment are reviewed and discussed. The use of these procedures, which include several approaches such as: matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD), solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) and stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), represents an opportunity to reduce analysis time, solvent consumption, and overall cost. SPE techniques differ from solvent extraction depending on the interactions between a sorbent and the pesticide. This interaction may be specific for a particular pesticide, as in the interaction with an immunosorbent, or non-specific, as in the way a number of different pesticides are adsorbed on apolar or polar materials. A variety of applications were classified according to the method applied: conventional SPE, SPME, hollow-fiber micro-extraction (HFME), MSPD and SBSE. Emphasis is placed on the multiresidue analysis of liquid and solid samples.