Spatial Structure of the Transmembrane Domain Heterodimer of ErbB1 and ErbB2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases of the ErbB family play a significant role in vital cellular processes and various cancers. During signal transduction across plasma membrane, ErbB receptors are involved in lateral homodimerization and heterodimerization with proper assembly of their extracellular single-span transmembrane (TM) and cytoplasmic domains. The ErbB1/ErbB2 heterodimer appears to be the strongest and most potent inducer of cellular transformation and mitogenic signaling compared to other ErbB homodimers and heterodimers. Spatial structure of the heterodimeric complex formed by TM domains of ErbB1 and ErbB2 receptors embedded into lipid bicelles was obtained by solution NMR. The ErbB1 and ErbB2 TM domains associate in a right-handed α-helical bundle through their N-terminal double GG4-like motif T⁶⁴⁸G⁶⁴⁹X₂G⁶⁵²A⁶⁵³ and glycine zipper motif T⁶⁵²X₃S⁶⁵⁶X₃G⁶⁶⁰, respectively. The described heterodimer conformation is believed to support the juxtamembrane and kinase domain configuration corresponding to the receptor active state. The capability for multiple polar interactions, along with hydrogen bonding between TM segments, correlates with the observed highest affinity of the ErbB1/ErbB2 heterodimer, implying an important contribution of the TM helix-helix interaction to signal transduction.     

A Cytosolic Juxtamembrane Interface Modulates Plexin A3 Oligomerization and Signal Transduction

Plexins (plxns) are transmembrane (TM) receptors involved in the guidance of vascular, lymphatic vessel, and neuron growth as well as cancer metastasis. Plxn signaling results in cytosolic GTPase-activating protein activity, and previous research implicates dimerization as important for activation of plxn signaling. Purified, soluble plxn extracellular and cytosolic domains exhibit only weak homomeric interactions, suggesting a role for the plxn TM and juxtamembrane regions in homooligomerization. In this study, we consider a heptad repeat in the Danio rerio PlxnA3 cytosolic juxtamembrane domain (JM) for its ability to influence PlxnA3 homooligomerization in TM-domain containing constructs. Site-directed mutagenesis in conjunction with the AraTM assay and bioluminescent energy transfer (BRET²) suggest an interface involving a JM heptad repeat, in particular residue M1281, regulates PlxnA3 homomeric interactions when examined in constructs containing an ectodomain, TM and JM domain. In the presence of a neuropilin-2a co-receptor and semaphorin 3F ligand, disruption to PlxnA3 homodimerization caused by an M1281F mutation is eliminated, suggesting destabilization of the PlxnA3 homodimer in the JM is not sufficient to disrupt co-receptor complex formation. In contrast, enhanced homodimerization of PlxnA3 caused by mutation M1281L remains even in the presence of ligand semaphorin 3F and co-receptor neuropilin-2a. Consistent with this pattern of PlxnA3 dimerization in the presence of ligand and co-receptor, destabilizing mutations to PlxnA3 homodimerization (M1281F) are able to rescue motor patterning defects in sidetracked zebrafish embryos, whereas mutations that enhance PlxnA3 homodimerization (M1281L) are not. Collectively, our results indicate the JM heptad repeat, in particular residue M1281, forms a switchable interface that modulates both PlxnA3 homomeric interactions and signal transduction.     

Preparation of pro-oncogenic mutant forms V659E and V659Q of the transmembrane domain of receptor protein kinase ErbB2 for structural studies

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) play an important role in intercellular signal transduction through the plasma membrane. RTKs are integral membrane proteins activated upon lateral homo- or heterodimerization involving their transmembrane domain. The polymorphism and mutations in RTK transmembrane (TM) domains are directly associated with a number of human diseases. The family of epidermal growth factor receptors, ErbB, is an important class of RTKs participating in human cell growth, development, and differentiation. In order to investigate the influence of pathogenic mutations in ErbB TM domains on the structural and dynamic properties of these receptors and on specific interactions of their TM domains, we have developed highly effective systems of bacterial expression and purification of recombinant transmembrane fragments ErbB2_641–684 with pro-oncogenic substitution of Val⁶⁵⁹ by Glu or Gln. Transmembrane fragments were obtained in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS as a fusion protein with thioredoxin A. The purification protocol includes immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC) and cation-exchange chromatography. The application of the protease Thrombin for hybrid protein hydrolysis considerably reduces financial expenditure as compared to the analogous protocols. The described techniques allow obtaining the milligram quantities of ErbB2 transmembrane fragments and its ¹⁵N-/[¹⁵N, ¹³C]-isotope-labeled derivatives for the analysis of their spatial structure using high-resolution heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy in a membrane-mimicking milieu.     

Two transmembrane Cys residues are involved in 5-HT4 receptor dimerization

The 5-HT₄ receptor (5-HT₄R) belongs to the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family and is of considerable interest for the development of new drugs to treat gastrointestinal diseases and memory disorders. The 5-HT₄R exists as a constitutive dimer but its molecular determinants are still unknown. Using co-immunoprecipitation and Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) techniques, we show here that 5-HT₄R homodimerization but not 5-HT₄R-β₂ adrenergic receptor (β₂AR) heterodimerization is largely decreased under reducing conditions suggesting the participation of disulfide bonds in 5-HT₄R dimerization. Molecular modeling and protein docking experiments identified four cysteine (Cys) residues potentially involved in the dimer interface through intramolecular or intermolecular disulfide bonds. We show that disulfide bridges between Cys112 and Cys145 located within TM3 and TM4, respectively, are of critical importance for 5-HT₄R dimer formation. Our data suggest that two disulfide bridges between two transmembrane Cys residues are involved in the dimerization interface of a GPCR.     

Specificity for Homooligomer versus Heterooligomer Formation in Integrin Transmembrane Helices

Transmembrane (TM) helices engage in homomeric and heteromeric interactions that play essential roles in the folding and assembly of TM proteins. However, features that explain their propensity to interact homomerically or heteromerically and determine the strength of these interactions are poorly understood. Integrins provide an ideal model system for addressing these questions because the TM helices of full-length integrins interact heteromerically when integrins are inactive, but isolated TM helices are also able to form homodimers or homooligomers in micelles and bacterial membranes. We sought to determine the features defining specificity for homointeractions versus heterointeractions by conducting a comprehensive comparison of the homomeric and heteromeric interactions of integrin αIIbβ3 TM helices in biological membranes. Using the TOXCAT assay, we found that residues V700, M701, A703, I704, L705, G708, L709, L712, and L713, which are located on the same face of the β3 helix, mediate homodimer formation. We then characterized the β3 heterodimer by measuring the ability of β3 helix mutations to cause ligand binding to αIIbβ3. We found that mutating V696, L697, V700, M701, A703. I704, L705, G708, L712, and L713, but not the small residue-X₃-small residue motif S699-X₃-A703, caused constitutive αIIbβ3 activation, as well as persistent focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation dependent on αIIbβ3 activation. Because αIIb and β3 use the same face of their respective TM helices for homomeric and heteromeric interactions, the interacting surface on each has an intrinsic “stickiness” predisposing towards helix-helix interactions in membranes. The residues responsible for heterodimer formation comprise a network of interdigitated side chains with considerable geometric complementarity; mutations along this interface invariably destabilize heterodimer formation. By contrast, residues responsible for homomeric interactions are dispersed over a wider surface. While most mutations of these residues are destabilizing, some stabilized homooligomer formation. We conclude that the αIIbβ3 TM heterodimer shows the hallmark of finely tuned heterodimeric interaction, while homomeric interaction is less specific.     

Evidence for New Homotypic and Heterotypic Interactions between Transmembrane Helices of Proteins Involved in Receptor Tyrosine Kinase and Neuropilin Signaling

Signaling in eukaryotic cells frequently relies on dynamic interactions of single-pass membrane receptors involving their transmembrane (TM) domains. To search for new such interactions, we have developed a bacterial two-hybrid system to screen for both homotypic and heterotypic interactions between TM helices. We have explored the dimerization of TM domains from 16 proteins involved in both receptor tyrosine kinase and neuropilin signaling. This study has revealed several new interactions. We found that the TM domain of Mucin-4, a putative intramembrane ligand for erbB2, dimerizes not only with erbB2 but also with all four members of the erbB family. In the Neuropilin/Plexin family of receptors, we showed that the TM domains of Neuropilins 1 and 2 dimerize with themselves and also with Plexin-A1, Plexin-B1, and L1CAM, but we were unable to observe interactions with several other TM domains notably those of members of the VEGF receptor family. The potentially important Neuropilin 1/Plexin-A1 interaction was confirmed using a surface plasmon resonance assay. This work shows that TM domain interactions can be highly specific. Exploring further the propensities of TM helix–helix association in cell membrane should have important practical implications related to our understanding of the structure–function of bitopic proteins' assembly and subsequent function, especially in the regulation of signal transduction.     

Synthesis and initial characterization of FGFR3 transmembrane domain: consequences of sequence modifications

Receptor Tyrosine Kinases (RTKs) conduct biochemical signals via lateral dimerization in the plasma membrane, and defects in their dimerization lead to unregulated signaling and disease. RTK transmembrane (TM) domains are proposed to play an important role in the process, underscored by the finding that single amino acids mutations in the TM domains can induce pathological phenotypes. Therefore, many important questions pertaining to the mode of signal transduction and the mechanism of pathology induction could be answered by studying the chemical-physical basis behind RTK TM domain dimerization and the interactions of RTK TM domains with lipids in model bilayer systems. As a first step towards this goal, here we report the synthesis of the TM domain of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3), an RTK that is crucial for skeletal development. We have used solid phase peptide synthesis to produce two peptides: one corresponding to the membrane embedded segment and the naturally occurring flanking residues at the N- and C-termini (TM_wt), and a second one in which the flanking residues have been substituted with diLysines at the termini (TM_KK). We have demonstrated that the hydrophobic FGFR3 TM domain can be synthesized for biophysical studies with high yield. The protocol presented in the paper can be applied to the synthesis of other RTK TM domains. As expected, the Lys flanks decrease the hydrophobicity of the TM domain, such that TM_KK elutes much earlier than TM_wt during reverse phase HPLC purification. The Lysines have no effect on peptide solubility in SDS and on peptide secondary structure, but they abolish peptide dimerization on SDS gels. These results suggest that caution should be exercised when modifying RTK TM domains to render them more manageable for biophysical studies.     

Ganglioside Structure Dictates Signal Transduction by Cholera Toxin and Association with Caveolae-like Membrane Domains in Polarized Epithelia

In polarized cells, signal transduction by cholera toxin (CT) requires apical endocytosis and retrograde transport into Golgi cisternae and perhaps ER (Lencer, W.I., C. Constable, S. Moe, M. Jobling, H.M. Webb, S. Ruston, J.L. Madara, T. Hirst, and R. Holmes. 1995. J. Cell Biol. 131:951–962). In this study, we tested whether CT's apical membrane receptor ganglioside GM1 acts specifically in toxin action. To do so, we used CT and the related Escherichia coli heat-labile type II enterotoxin LTIIb. CT and LTIIb distinguish between gangliosides GM1 and GD1a at the cell surface by virtue of their dissimilar receptor-binding B subunits. The enzymatically active A subunits, however, are homologous. While both toxins bound specifically to human intestinal T84 cells (K_d ≈ 5 nM), only CT elicited a cAMP-dependent Cl⁻ secretory response. LTIIb, however, was more potent than CT in eliciting a cAMP-dependent response from mouse Y1 adrenal cells (toxic dose 10 vs. 300 pg/well). In T84 cells, CT fractionated with caveolae-like detergent-insoluble membranes, but LTIIb did not. To investigate further the relationship between the specificity of ganglioside binding and partitioning into detergent-insoluble membranes and signal transduction, CT and LTIIb chimeric toxins were prepared. Analysis of these chimeric toxins confirmed that toxin-induced signal transduction depended critically on the specificity of ganglioside structure. The mechanism(s) by which ganglioside GM1 functions in signal transduction likely depends on coupling CT with caveolae or caveolae-related membrane domains.     

GALLEX,a measurement of heterologous association of transmembrane helices in a biological membrane

Whereas a variety of two-hybrid systems are available to measure the interaction of soluble proteins, related methods are significantly less developed for the measurement of membrane protein interactions. Here we present a two-hybrid system to follow the heterodimerization of membrane proteins in the Escherichia coli inner membrane. The method is based on the repression of a reporter gene activity by two LexA DNA binding domains with different DNA binding specificities. When coupled to transmembrane domains, heterodimeric association is reported by repression of beta-galactosidase synthesis. The LexA-transmembrane chimeric proteins were found to correctly insert into the membrane, and reproducible signals were obtained measuring the homodimerization as well as heterodimerization of wild-type and mutant glycophorin A transmembrane helices. The GALLEX data were compared with data recently gained by other methods and discussed in the general context of heteroassociation of single TM helices. Additionally, the formation of heterodimers between the TM domains of the alpha(4) and the beta(7) integrin subunits were tested. The results show that both homo- and heterodimerization of membrane proteins can be measured accurately using the GALLEX system.     

FlyXCDB—A Resource for Drosophila Cell Surface and Secreted Proteins and Their Extracellular Domains

Genomes of metazoan organisms possess a large number of genes encoding cell surface and secreted (CSS) proteins that carry out crucial functions in cell adhesion and communication, signal transduction, extracellular matrix establishment, nutrient digestion and uptake, immunity, and developmental processes. We developed the FlyXCDB database (http://prodata.swmed.edu/FlyXCDB) that provides a comprehensive resource to investigate extracellular (XC) domains in CSS proteins of Drosophila melanogaster, the most studied insect model organism in various aspects of animal biology. More than 300 Drosophila XC domains were discovered in Drosophila CSS proteins encoded by over 2500 genes through analyses of computational predictions of signal peptide, transmembrane (TM) segment, and GPI-anchor signal sequence, profile-based sequence similarity searches, gene ontology, and literature. These domains were classified into six classes mainly based on their molecular functions, including protein–protein interactions (class P), signaling molecules (class S), binding of non-protein molecules or groups (class B), enzyme homologs (class E), enzyme regulation and inhibition (class R), and unknown molecular function (class U). Main cellular functions such as cell adhesion, cell signaling, and extracellular matrix composition were described for the most abundant domains in each functional class. We assigned cell membrane topology categories (E, secreted; S, type I/III single-pass TM; T, type II single-pass TM; M, multi-pass TM; and G, GPI-anchored) to the products of genes with XC domains and investigated their regulation by mechanisms such as alternative splicing and stop codon readthrough.     

Two motifs within a transmembrane domain, one for homodimerization and the other for heterodimerization

Protein assembly is a critical process involved in a wide range of cellular events and occurs through extracellular and/or transmembrane domains (TMs). Previous studies demonstrated that a GXXXG motif is crucial for homodimer formation. Here we selected the TMs of ErbB1 and ErbB2 as a model since these receptors function both as homodimers and as heterodimers. Both TMs contain two GXXXG-like motifs located at the C and N termini. The C-terminal motifs were implicated previously in homodimer formation, but the role of the N-terminal motifs was not clear. We used the ToxR system and expressed the TMs of both ErbB1 and ErbB2 containing only the N-terminal GXXXG motifs. The data revealed that the ErbB2 but not the ErbB1 construct formed homodimers. Importantly, a synthetic ErbB1 TM peptide was able to form a heterodimer with ErbB2, by displacing the ErbB2 TM homodimer. The specificity of the interaction was demonstrated by using three controls: (i) Two single mutations within the GXXXG-like motif of the ErbB1 peptide reduced or preserved its activity, in agreement with similar mutations in glycophorin A. (ii) A TM peptide of the bacterial Tar receptor did not assemble with the ErbB2 construct. (iii) The ErbB1 peptide had no effect on the dimerization of a construct containing the TM-1 domain of the Tar receptor. Fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that all the peptides localized on the membrane. Furthermore, incubation with the peptides had no effect on bacterial growth and protein expression levels. Our results suggest that the N-terminal GXXXG-like motif of the ErbB1 TM plays a role in heterodimerization with the ErbB2 transmembrane domain. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a transmembrane domain with two distinct recognition motifs, one for homodimerization and the other for heterodimerization.     

Disruption of Rhodopsin Dimerization with Synthetic Peptides Targeting an Interaction Interface

Although homo- and heterodimerizations of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are well documented, GPCR monomers are able to assemble in different ways, thus causing variations in the interactive interface between receptor monomers among different GPCRs. Moreover, the functional consequences of this phenomenon, which remain to be clarified, could be specific for different GPCRs. Synthetic peptides derived from transmembrane (TM) domains can interact with a full-length GPCR, blocking dimer formation and affecting its function. Here we used peptides corresponding to TM helices of bovine rhodopsin (Rho) to investigate the Rho dimer interface and functional consequences of its disruption. Incubation of Rho with TM1, TM2, TM4, and TM5 peptides in rod outer segment (ROS) membranes shifted the resulting detergent-solubilized protein migration through a gel filtration column toward smaller molecular masses with a reduced propensity for dimer formation in a cross-linking reaction. Binding of these TM peptides to Rho was characterized by both mass spectrometry and a label-free assay from which dissociation constants were calculated. A BRET (bioluminescence resonance energy transfer) assay revealed that the physical interaction between Rho molecules expressed in membranes of living cells was blocked by the same four TM peptides identified in our in vitro experiments. Although disruption of the Rho dimer/oligomer had no effect on the rates of G protein activation, binding of G_t to the activated receptor stabilized the dimer. However, TM peptide-induced disruption of dimer/oligomer decreased receptor stability, suggesting that Rho supramolecular organization could be essential for ROS stabilization and receptor trafficking.     

Signaling by chimeric erythropoietin-TGF-beta receptors: homodimerization of the cytoplasmic domain of the type I TGF-beta receptor and heterodimerization with the type II receptor are both required for intracellular signal transduction.

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) affects multiple cellular functions through the type I and type II receptor Ser/Thr kinases (TbetaRI and TbetaRII). Analysis of TGF-beta signaling pathways has been hampered by the lack of cell lines in which both TbetaRI and TbetaRII are deleted, and by the inability to study signal transduction by TbetaRI independently of TbetaRII since TbetaRI does not bind TGF-beta directly. To overcome these problems, we constructed and expressed chimeric receptors with the extracellular domain of the erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) and the cytoplasmic domains of TbetaRI or TbetaRII. When expressed in Ba/F3 cells, which do not express EpoR, Epo induces the formation of a heteromeric complex between cell surface EpoR-TbetaRI and EpoR-TbetaRII chimeras. Neither the EpoR-TbetaRI nor the EpoR-TbetaRII chimera interacts with endogenous TGF-beta receptors. Ba/F3 cells expressing both EpoR-TbetaRI and EpoR-TbetaRII chimeras, but not EpoR-TbetaRI or EpoR-TbetaRII alone, undergo Epo-induced growth arrest. When expressed in Ba/F3 cells in the absence of the EpoR-TbetaRII chimera, EpoR-TbetaRI(T204D), a chimeric receptor with a point mutation in the GS domain of TbetaRI that is autophosphorylated constitutively, triggers growth inhibition in response to Epo. Thus, both homo- and heterodimerization of the cytoplasmic domain of the type I TGF-beta receptor are required for intracellular signal transduction leading to inhibition of cell proliferation. These chimeric receptors provide a unique system to study the function and signal transduction of individual TGF-beta receptor subunits independently of endogenous TGF-beta receptors.     

Proteinase-activated receptors (PARs) – focus on receptor-receptor-interactions and their physiological and pathophysiological impact

Proteinase-activated receptors (PARs) are a subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with four members, PAR₁, PAR₂, PAR₃ and PAR₄, playing critical functions in hemostasis, thrombosis, embryonic development, wound healing, inflammation and cancer progression. PARs are characterized by a unique activation mechanism involving receptor cleavage by different proteinases at specific sites within the extracellular amino-terminus and the exposure of amino-terminal “tethered ligand“ domains that bind to and activate the cleaved receptors. After activation, the PAR family members are able to stimulate complex intracellular signalling networks via classical G protein-mediated pathways and beta-arrestin signalling. In addition, different receptor crosstalk mechanisms critically contribute to a high diversity of PAR signal transduction and receptor-trafficking processes that result in multiple physiological effects.In this review, we summarize current information about PAR-initiated physical and functional receptor interactions and their physiological and pathological roles. We focus especially on PAR homo- and heterodimerization, transactivation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and receptor serine/threonine kinases (RSTKs), communication with other GPCRs, toll-like receptors and NOD-like receptors, ion channel receptors, and on PAR association with cargo receptors. In addition, we discuss the suitability of these receptor interaction mechanisms as targets for modulating PAR signalling in disease.     

The TβR-I pre-helix extension is structurally ordered in the unbound form and its flanking prolines are essential for binding

Transforming growth factor β isoforms (TGF-β) are among the most recently evolved members of a signaling superfamily with more than 30 members. TGF-β play vital roles in regulating cellular growth and differentiation, and they signal through a highly restricted subset of receptors known as TGF-β type I receptor (TβR-I) and TGF-β type II receptor (TβR-II). TGF-β's specificity for TβR-I has been proposed to arise from its pre-helix extension, a five-residue loop that binds in the cleft between TGF-β and TβR-II. The structure and backbone dynamics of the unbound form of the TβR-I extracellular domain were determined using NMR to investigate the extension's role in binding. This showed that the unbound form is highly similar to the bound form in terms of both the β-strand framework that defines the three-finger toxin fold and the extension and its characteristic cis-Ile54-Pro55 peptide bond. The NMR data further showed that the extension and two flanking 3₁₀ helices are rigid on the nanosecond-to-picosecond timescale. The functional significance of several residues within the extension was investigated by binding studies and reporter gene assays in cultured epithelial cells. These demonstrated that the pre-helix extension is essential for binding, with Pro55 and Pro59 each playing a major role. These findings suggest that the pre-helix extension and its flanking prolines evolved to endow the TGF-β signaling complex with its unique specificity, departing from the ancestral promiscuity of the bone morphogenetic protein subfamily, where the binding interface of the type I receptor is highly flexible.