Isolation of mouse mammary epithelial progenitor cells with basal characteristics from the Comma-Dbeta cell line

A mouse mammary epithelial cell line with morphogenetic properties in vivo, Comma-Dbeta, was used to isolate and to characterize mammary progenitor cells. We found that a homogeneous cell population expressing high surface levels of stem cell antigen 1 (Sca-1) was able to give rise in vivo to ductal and alveolar structures comprising luminal secretory and basal myoepithelial cells. Unlike the Sca-1(high), the Sca-1(neg/low) cell population displayed a reduced morphogenetic potential. The Sca-1(high) cells presented moderate CD24, high CD44 and alpha6 integrin surface levels, expressed basal cell markers p63, keratins 5 and 14, but no luminal and myoepithelial lineage markers. In culture, the Sca-1(high) cells generated identical daughter cells that retained their in vivo developmental potential, indicating that these cells were maintained by self-renewal. Plated at clonogenic density in Matrigel, Sca-1(high) cells formed spheroids that included luminal and myoepithelial cells. Thus, the isolated Sca-1(high) basal cells possess several features of stem/progenitor cells, including specific markers, self-renewal capacity, and the ability to generate the two major mammary lineages, luminal and myoepithelial. These data provide evidence for the existence of basal-type mouse mammary progenitors able to participate in the morphogenetic processes characteristic of mammary gland development.     

Differentiation dynamics of mammary epithelial stem cells from Korean holstein dairy cattle under ECM-free conditions

The “stem cells” are commonly defined as “cells capable of self-renewal through replication and differentiating into specific lineages”. The mammary gland contains functional stem/progenitor cells. The current study was planned with the objectives to study the differentiation dynamics of Korean Holstein mammary epithelial stem cells (KHMESCs) under the optimum culture conditions. Lineage negative KHMESCs isolated from mammary tissue of lactating cows have shown the typical differentiation dynamics with formation of lobulo–alveolar structures in in vitro culture. This suggests the existence of bipotential mammary epithelial stem cells in the mammary gland. The strong mRNA expression of pluripotency factors indicates stemness, whereas expression of milk protein genes and epithelial cell-specific gene indicate their differentiation capabilities. Further, immunostaining results have shown the differentiation capabilities of KHMESCs into both luminal and basal lineages under the extracellular matrix (ECM, matrigel) free environment. However, under matrigel, the differentiation process was comparatively higher than without matrigel. Immunostaining results also suggested that differentiated cells could secrete milk proteins such as β-casein. To our knowledge, these data represent the first report on the differentiation dynamics and establishment of mammary epithelial stem cells from Korean Holstein with typical stemness properties. It was observed that isolated KHMESCs had normal morphology, growth pattern, differentiation ability, cytogenetic and secretory activity even without ECM. Therefore, it is concluded that established KHMESCs could be used for further studies on Korean Holstein dairy cows related to lactation studies, as non-GMO animal bioreactors and stem cell-based management of bovine mastitis including post-mastitis damage.     

Recombinant PBD‐1 (porcine beta‐defensin 1) expressed in the milk by transplanting transgenic mES‐like‐derived cells into mouse mammary gland

ES (embryonic stem)‐derived cells have been investigated in many animal models of severe injury and degenerative disease. However, few studies have examined the ability of ES‐derived cells to improve functional outcome following partially damaged breast and also the modification of mammary tissue to produce costly proteins. This study investigates the feasibility of implanting mES‐dK (mouse ES‐derived keratinocytes‐like) cells stably transfected with a mammary gland special expression vector for the PBD‐1 (porcine beta‐defensin 1) in developing mammary glands. Our aim was to assess the ability of cell grafting to improve functional outcome following partial damage of the breast, also on the breast modification mammary tissue in mice for the production of PBD‐1 protein secreted in the milk. Our results showed that the ratios of the surviving cells labelled with the myoepithelial or luminal cell markers, EMA (epithelial membrane antigen) and CALLA, were 41.7±15.2% and 28.4±9.6%, respectively, which revealed that transplanted mES‐dK cells survived, integrated in vivo and differentiated into myoepithelial or luminal cells. In addition, Western blot analysis showed that 37.5% (3 out of 8) female transplanted mice had PBD‐1 expression in their milk and reached 0.4998, 0.5229 and 0.5195 μg/ml, respectively.     

Cell differentiation lineage in the prostate

Prostatic epithelium consists mainly of luminal and basal cells, which are presumed to differentiate from common progenitor/stem cells. We hypothesize that progenitor/stem cells are highly concentrated in the embryonic urogenital sinus epithelium from which prostatic epithelial buds develop. We further hypothesize that these epithelial progenitor/stem cells are also present within the basal compartment of adult prostatic epithelium and that the spectrum of differentiation markers of embryonic and adult progenitor/stem cells will be similar. The present study demonstrates that the majority of cells in embryonic urogenital sinus epithelium and developing prostatic epithelium (rat, mouse, and human) co-expressed luminal cytokeratins 8 and 18 (CK8, CK18), the basal cell cytokeratins (CK14, CK5), p63, and the so-called transitional or intermediate cell markers, cytokeratin 19 (CK19) and glutathione-S-transferase-pi (GSTpi). The majority of luminal cells in adult rodent and human prostates only expressed luminal markers (CK8, CK18), while the basal epithelial cell compartment contained several distinct subpopulations. In the adult prostate, the predominant basal epithelial subpopulation expressed the classical basal cell markers (CK5, CK14, p63) as well as CK19 and GSTpi. However, a small fraction of adult prostatic basal epithelial cells co-expressed the full spectrum of basal and luminal epithelial cell markers (CK5, CK14, CK8, CK18, CK19, p63, GSTpi). This adult prostatic basal epithelial cell subpopulation, thus, exhibited a cell differentiation marker profile similar to that expressed in embryonic urogenital sinus epithelium. These rare adult prostatic basal epithelial cells are proposed to be the progenitor/stem cell population. Thus, we propose that at all stages (embryonic to adult) prostatic epithelial progenitor/stem cells maintain a differentiation marker profile similar to that of the original embryonic progenitor of the prostate, namely urogenital sinus epithelium. Adult progenitor/stem cells co-express both luminal cell, basal cell, and intermediate cell markers. These progenitor/stem cells differentiate into mature luminal cells by maintaining CK8 and CK18, and losing all other makers. Progenitor/stem cells also give rise to mature basal cells by maintaining CK5, CK14, p63, CK19, and GSTpi and losing K8 and K18. Thus, adult prostate basal and luminal cells are proposed to be derived from a common pleuripotent progenitor/stem cell in the basal compartment that maintains its embryonic profile of differentiation markers from embryonic to adult stages.     

Matrix compliance and RhoA direct the differentiation of mammary progenitor cells

The regenerative capacity of the mammary gland following post-lactational involution depends on the presence of multipotent stem or progenitor cells. Mammary progenitor cells exist as a quiescent and self-renewing population capable of differentiating into luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells and generating ductal and alveolar structures. The fate choices of these cells are regulated by several soluble signals as well as their surrounding extracellular matrix. Whereas matrix stiffness has been implicated in organ-specific differentiation of embryonic and mesenchymal stem cells, the effects of substratum compliance on the more limited fate switches typical of tissue-specific progenitor cells are unknown. Here, we examined how the mechanical properties of the microenvironment affect the differentiation of mammary progenitor cells. Immortalized human mammary progenitor cells were cultured on synthetic hydrogels of varying stiffness, and their self-renewal and fate decisions were quantified. We found that cells cultured on soft substrata differentiated preferentially into luminal epithelial cells, whereas those cultured on stiff substrata differentiated preferentially into myoepithelial cells. Furthermore, pharmacological manipulations of cytoskeletal tension in conjunction with analysis of gene expression revealed that mechanical properties of the microenvironment signal through the small GTPase RhoA and cytoskeletal contractility to modulate the differentiation of mammary progenitor cells. These data suggest that subtle variations in the mechanical compliance of a tissue can direct the fate decisions of its resident progenitor cells.     

Evidence of progenitor cells of glandular and myoepithelial cell lineages in the human adult female breast epithelium: a new progenitor (adult stem) cell concept

Although experimental data clearly confirm the existence of self-renewing mammary stem cells, the characteristics of such progenitor cells have never been satisfactorily defined. Using a double immunofluorescence technique for simultaneous detection of the basal cytokeratin 5, the glandular cytokeratins 8/18 and the myoepithelial differentiation marker smooth muscle actin (SMA), we were able to demonstrate the presence of CK5+ cells in human adult breast epithelium. These cells have the potential to differentiate to either glandular (CK8/18+) or myoepithelial cells (SMA+) through intermediary cells (CK5+ and CK8/18+ or SMA+). We therefore proceeded on the assumption that the CK5+ cells are phenotypically and behaviourally progenitor (committed adult stem) cells of human breast epithelium. Furthermore, we furnish evidence that most of these progenitor cells are located in the luminal epithelium of the ductal lobular tree. Based on data obtained in extensive analyses of proliferative breast disease lesions, we have come to regard usual ductal hyperplasia as a progenitor cell-derived lesion, whereas most breast cancers seem to evolve from differentiated glandular cells. Double immunofluorescence experiments provide a new tool to characterize phenotypically progenitor (adult stem) cells and their progenies. This model has been shown to be of great value for a better understanding not only of normal tissue regeneration but also of proliferative breast disease. Furthermore, this model provides a new tool for unravelling further the regulatory mechanisms that govern normal and pathological cell growth.     

Growth and differentiation of progenitor/stem cells derived from the human mammary gland

Estrogen is necessary for the full development of the mammary gland and it is also involved in breast cancer development. We set out to identify and characterise progenitor/stem cells in the human mammary gland and to explore the role of estrogen in their proliferation and differentiation. Three candidate stem cell populations were isolated: double positive (DP) cells co-expressed the luminal and myoepithelial markers, EMA and CALLA, respectively, whereas double negative (DN) cells did not express these cell surface markers; side population (SP) cells were characterised by their differential ability to efflux the dye Hoechst 33342. The ABC transporter, breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) was more highly expressed in SP cells than in non-SP cells and a specific BCRP inhibitor, Ko143, reduced SP formation, suggesting that BCRP confers the SP phenotype in mammary epithelial cells, as has been demonstrated in other tissues. Interestingly, SP cells were double negative for the EMA and CALLA antigens and therefore represent a separate and distinct population to DP cells. Single cell multiplex RT-PCR indicated that the SP and DN cells do not express detectable levels of ERalpha or ERbeta, suggesting that estrogen is not involved in their proliferation. DP cells expressed ERalpha but at a lower level than differentiated luminal cells. These findings invoke a potential strategy for the breast stem/progenitor cells to ignore the mitogenic effects of estrogen. All three cell populations generated mixed colonies containing both luminal and myoepithelial cells from a single cell and therefore represent candidate multipotent stem cells. However, DN cells predominately generated luminal colonies and exhibited a much higher cloning efficiency than differentiated luminal cells. Further characterisation of these candidate progenitor/stem cells should contribute to a better understanding of normal mammary gland development and breast tumorigenesis.     

Bovine mammary stem cells: cell biology meets production agriculture

Mammary stem cells (MaSC) provide for net growth, renewal and turnover of mammary epithelial cells, and are therefore potential targets for strategies to increase production efficiency. Appropriate regulation of MaSC can potentially benefit milk yield, persistency, dry period management and tissue repair. Accordingly, we and others have attempted to characterize and alter the function of bovine MaSC. In this review, we provide an overview of current knowledge of MaSC gained from studies using mouse and human model systems and present research on bovine MaSC within that context. Recent data indicate that MaSC retain labeled DNA for extended periods because of their selective segregation of template DNA strands during mitosis. Relying on this long-term retention of bromodeoxyuridine-labeled DNA, we identified putative bovine MaSC. These label-retaining epithelial cells (LREC) are in low abundance within mammary epithelium (<1%). They are predominantly estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and localized in a basal or suprabasal layer of the epithelium throughout the gland. Thus, the response of MaSC to estrogen, the major mitogen in mammary gland, is likely mediated by paracrine factors released by cells that are ER-positive. This is consistent with considerable evidence for cross-talk within and between epithelial cells and surrounding stromal cells. Excision of classes of cells by laser microdissection and subsequent microarray analysis will hopefully provide markers for MaSC and insights into their regulation. Preliminary analyses of gene expression in laser-microdissected LREC and non-LREC are consistent with the concept that LREC represent populations of stem cells and progenitor cells that differ with regard to their properties and location within the epithelial layer. We have attempted to modulate the MaSC number by infusing a solution of xanthosine through the teat canal and into the ductal network of the mammary glands of prepubertal heifers. This treatment increased the number of putative stem cells, as evidenced by an increase in the percentage of LREC and increased telomerase activity within the tissue. The exciting possibility that stem cell expansion can influence milk production is currently under investigation.     

The acute-phase protein serum amyloid A3 is expressed in the bovine mammary gland and plays a role in host defence

The serum amyloid A protein is one of the major reactants in the acute-phase response. Using representational difference analysis comparing RNA from normal and involuting quarters of a dairy cow mammary gland, we found an mRNA encoding the SAA3 protein (M-SAA3). The M-SAA3 mRNA was localized to restricted populations of bovine mammary epithelial cells (MECs). It was expressed at a moderate level in late pregnancy, at a low level through lactation, was induced early in milk stasis, and expressed at high levels in most MECs during mid to late involution and inflammation/mastitis. The mature M-SAA3 peptide was expressed in Escherichia coli, antibodies made, and shown to have antibacterial activity against E. coli, Streptococcus uberis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. These results suggest that the mammary SAA3 may have a role in protection of the mammary gland during remodelling and infection and possibly in the neonate gastrointestinal tract.     

Proteome analysis of functionally differentiated bovine (Bos indicus) mammary epithelial cells isolated from milk

Mammary gland is made up of a branching network of ducts that end in alveoli. Terminally differentiated mammary epithelial cells (MECs) constitute the innermost layer of aveoli. They are milk‐secreting cuboidal cells that secrete milk proteins during lactation. Little is known about the expression profile of proteins in the metabolically active MECs during lactation or their functional role in the lactation process. In the present investigation, we have reported the proteome map of MECs in lactating cows using 2DE MALDI‐TOF/TOF MS and 1D‐Gel‐LC‐MS/MS. MECs were isolated from milk using immunomagnetic beads and confirmed by RT‐PCR and Western blotting. The 1D‐Gel‐LC‐MS/MS and 2DE‐MS/MS based approaches led to identification of 431 and 134 proteins, respectively, with a total of 497 unique proteins. Proteins identified in this study were clustered into functional groups using bioinformatics tools. Pathway analysis of the identified proteins revealed 28 pathways (p < 0.05) providing evidence for involvement of various proteins in lactation function. This study further provides experimental evidence for the presence of many proteins that have been predicted in annotated bovine genome. The data generated further provide a set of bovine MEC‐specific proteins that will help the researchers to understand the molecular events taking place during lactation.     

Derivation of myoepithelial progenitor cells from bipotent mammary stem/progenitor cells

There is increasing evidence that breast and other cancers originate from and are maintained by a small fraction of stem/progenitor cells with self-renewal properties. Recent molecular profiling has identified six major subtypes of breast cancer: basal-like, ErbB2-overexpressing, normal breast epithelial-like, luminal A and B, and claudin-low subtypes. To help understand the relationship among mammary stem/progenitor cells and breast cancer subtypes, we have recently derived distinct hTERT-immortalized human mammary stem/progenitor cell lines: a K5(+)/K19(-) type, and a K5(+)/K19(+) type. Under specific culture conditions, bipotent K5(+)/K19(-) stem/progenitor cells differentiated into stable clonal populations that were K5(-)/K19(-) and exhibit self-renewal and unipotent myoepithelial differentiation potential in contrast to the parental K5(+)/K19(-) cells which are bipotent. These K5(-)/K19(-) cells function as myoepithelial progenitor cells and constitutively express markers of an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) and show high invasive and migratory abilities. In addition, these cells express a microarray signature of claudin-low breast cancers. The EMT characteristics of an un-transformed unipotent mammary myoepithelial progenitor cells together with claudin-low signature suggests that the claudin-low breast cancer subtype may arise from myoepithelial lineage committed progenitors. Availability of immortal MPCs should allow a more definitive analysis of their potential to give rise to claudin-low breast cancer subtype and facilitate biological and molecular/biochemical studies of this disease.     

Evidence of progenitor cells of glandular and myoepithelial cell lineages in the human adult female breast epithelium: a new progenitor (adult stem) cell concept

Abstract.  Although experimental data clearly confirm the existence of self-renewing mammary stem cells, the characteristics of such progenitor cells have never been satisfactorily defined. Using a double immunofluorescence technique for simultaneous detection of the basal cytokeratin 5, the glandular cytokeratins 8/18 and the myoepithelial differentiation marker smooth muscle actin (SMA), we were able to demonstrate the presence of CK5⁺ cells in human adult breast epithelium. These cells have the potential to differentiate to either glandular (CK8/18⁺) or myoepithelial cells (SMA⁺) through intermediary cells (CK5⁺ and CK8/18⁺ or SMA⁺). We therefore proceeded on the assumption that the CK5⁺ cells are phenotypically and behaviourally progenitor (committed adult stem) cells of human breast epithelium. Furthermore, we furnish evidence that most of these progenitor cells are located in the luminal epithelium of the ductal lobular tree. Based on data obtained in extensive analyses of proliferative breast disease lesions, we have come to regard usual ductal hyperplasia as a progenitor cell-derived lesion, whereas most breast cancers seem to evolve from differentiated glandular cells. Double immunofluorescence experiments provide a new tool to characterize phenotypically progenitor (adult stem) cells and their progenies. This model has been shown to be of great value for a better understanding not only of normal tissue regeneration but also of proliferative breast disease. Furthermore, this model provides a new tool for unravelling further the regulatory mechanisms that govern normal and pathological cell growth.     

The Role of the Microenvironment in Mammary Gland Development and Cancer

The mammary gland is composed of a diverse array of cell types that form intricate interaction networks essential for its normal development and physiologic function. Abnormalities in these interactions play an important role throughout different stages of tumorigenesis. Branching ducts and alveoli are lined by an inner layer of secretory luminal epithelial cells that produce milk during lactation and are surrounded by contractile myoepithelial cells and basement membrane. The surrounding stroma comprised of extracellular matrix and various cell types including fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and infiltrating leukocytes not only provides a scaffold for the organ, but also regulates mammary epithelial cell function via paracrine, physical, and hormonal interactions. With rare exceptions breast tumors initiate in the epithelial compartment and in their initial phases are confined to the ducts but this barrier brakes down with invasive progression because of a combination of signals emitted by tumor epithelial and various stromal cells. In this article, we overview the importance of cellular interactions and microenvironmental signals in mammary gland development and cancer.The mammary gland is composed of a combination of multiple cell types that together form complex interaction networks required for the proper development and functioning of the organ. The branching milk ducts are formed by an outer myoepithelial cell layer producing the basement membrane (BM) and an inner luminal epithelial cell layer producing milk during lactation. The ducts are surrounded by the microenvironment composed of extracellular matrix (ECM) and various stromal cell types (e.g., endothelial cells, fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and leukocytes). Large amount of data suggest that cell-cell and cell-microenvironment interactions modify the proliferation, survival, polarity, differentiation, and invasive capacity of mammary epithelial cells. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects are poorly understood. The purification and comprehensive characterization of each cell type comprising normal and neoplastic human breast tissue combined with hypothesis testing in cell culture and animal models are likely to improve our understanding of the role these cells play in the normal functioning of the mammary gland and in breast tumorigenesis. In this article, we overview cellular and microenvironmental interactions that play important roles in the normal functioning of the mammary gland and their abnormalities in breast cancer.     

Reconstitution of Mammary Epithelial Morphogenesis by Murine Embryonic Stem Cells Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Differentiation

Background

Mammary stem cells are maintained within specific microenvironments and recruited throughout lifetime to reconstitute de novo the mammary gland. Mammary stem cells have been isolated through the identification of specific cell surface markers and in vivo transplantation into cleared mammary fat pads. Accumulating evidence showed that during the reformation of mammary stem cell niches by dispersed epithelial cells in the context of the intact epithelium-free mammary stroma, non-mammary epithelial cells may be sequestered and reprogrammed to perform mammary epithelial cell functions and to adopt mammary epithelial characteristics during reconstruction of mammary epithelium in regenerating mammary tissue in vivo.

Methodology/Principal Findings

To examine whether other types of progenitor cells are able to contribute to mammary branching morphogenesis, we examined the potential of murine embryonic stem (mES) cells, undergoing hematopoietic differentiation, to support mammary reconstitution in vivo. We observed that cells from day 14 embryoid bodies (EBs) under hematopoietic differentiation condition, but not supernatants derived from these cells, when transplanted into denuded mammary fat pads, were able to contribute to both the luminal and myoepithelial lineages in branching ductal structures resembling the ductal-alveolar architecture of the mammary tree. No teratomas were observed when these cells were transplanted in vivo.

Conclusions/Significance

Our data provide evidence for the dominance of the tissue-specific mammary stem cell niche and its role in directing mES cells, undergoing hematopoietic differentiation, to reprogram into mammary epithelial cells and to promote mammary epithelial morphogenesis. These studies should also provide insights into regeneration of damaged mammary gland and the role of the mammary microenvironment in reprogramming cell fate.     

Luminal Progenitors Restrict Their Lineage Potential during Mammary Gland Development

The hierarchical relationships between stem cells and progenitors that guide mammary gland morphogenesis are still poorly defined. While multipotent basal stem cells have been found within the myoepithelial compartment, the in vivo lineage potential of luminal progenitors is unclear. Here we used the expression of the Notch1 receptor, previously implicated in mammary gland development and tumorigenesis, to elucidate the hierarchical organization of mammary stem/progenitor cells by lineage tracing. We found that Notch1 expression identifies multipotent stem cells in the embryonic mammary bud, which progressively restrict their lineage potential during mammary ductal morphogenesis to exclusively generate an ERα^neg luminal lineage postnatally. Importantly, our results show that Notch1-labelled cells represent the alveolar progenitors that expand during pregnancy and survive multiple successive involutions. This study reveals that postnatal luminal epithelial cells derive from distinct self-sustained lineages that may represent the cells of origin of different breast cancer subtypes.     

Slit2 and netrin 1 act synergistically as adhesive cues to generate tubular bi-layers during ductal morphogenesis

Development of many organs, including the mammary gland, involves ductal morphogenesis. Mammary ducts are bi-layered tubular structures comprising an outer layer of cap/myoepithelial cells (MECs) and an inner layer of luminal epithelial cells (LECs). Slit2 is expressed by cells in both layers, with secreted SLIT2 broadly distributed throughout the epithelial compartment. By contrast, Robo1 is expressed specifically by cap/MECs. Loss-of-function mutations in Slit2 and Robo1 yield similar phenotypes, characterized by disorganized end buds (EBs) reminiscent of those present in Ntn1(-/-) glands, suggesting that SLIT2 and NTN1 function in concert during mammary development. Analysis of Slit2(-/-);Ntn1(-/-) glands demonstrates an enhanced phenotype that extends through the ducts and is characterized by separated cell layers and occluded lumens. Aggregation assays show that Slit2(-/-);Ntn1(-/-) cells, in contrast to wild-type cells, do not form bi-layered organoids, a defect rescued by addition of SLIT2. NTN1 has no effect alone, but synergistically enhances this rescue. Thus, our data establish a novel role for SLIT2 as an adhesive cue, acting in parallel with NTN1 to generate cell boundaries along ducts during bi-layered tube formation.